Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Our two political parties: A resemblance to WrestleMania

Our two political parties: A resemblance to WrestleMania
Getty Images

Leland R. Beaumont is an independent wisdom researcher who is seeking real good. He is currently developing the Applied Wisdom curriculum on Wikiversity.

In the realm of politics, the rivalry between our two dominant political parties often resembles the spectacle and drama of a WrestleMania event. Like professional wrestlers vying for championship glory, these parties engage in heated verbal sparring and theatrical maneuvers while indulging passionate fanbases. However, as captivating as the political spectacle may be, it is essential to recognize that the current state of our political system is far from ideal. The intense competition and focus on winning elections have resulted in a polarized and dysfunctional political landscape that often fails to address the real issues faced by the nation.


One of the key parallels between WrestleMania and politics lies in the lack of genuine competition. The traditional two-party system has created a duopoly, where the focus is on maintaining power rather than delivering meaningful solutions to the people. This lack of competition stifles innovation and accountability, leaving voters with limited choices and entrenched party ideologies.

Furthermore, the quest for victory in politics often overshadows the pursuit of problem-solving. Political parties become more interested in defeating their opponents than collaborating on effective policies. As a result, we witness extreme stances, negative campaigning, and a growing sense of division among the electorate.

However, there is hope for reforming the politics industry and steering it toward a more constructive and accountable system. The book, The Politics Industry by Katherine M. Gehl and Michael E. Porter, presents transformative solutions that aim to address the core issues plaguing our political landscape.

The first proposal is to introduce open primaries, allowing all voters, regardless of party affiliation, to participate in candidate selection. This change would increase competition and force candidates to appeal to a broader range of voters, making them more responsive to the public’s needs and concerns.

Ranked-choice voting is another reform suggested in the book. By allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference, this system reduces the spoiler effect and creates space for third-party candidates to compete more effectively. As a result, the political landscape becomes more diverse and representative of the people’s varied interests.

Addressing the problem of gerrymandering, the book recommends implementing independent

redistricting commissions. These commissions would draw electoral district boundaries impartially, eliminating the manipulation of district lines to favor one party over another. This measure would foster a fairer and more competitive electoral process.

Non-partisan leadership is a crucial aspect of the proposed solutions. By encouraging the appointment of non-partisan leaders and legislative committees, the focus shifts from ideological battles to evidence-based policy solutions. Such an approach ensures that decisions are made in the best interest of the people rather than party-driven interests.

Lastly, the book emphasizes the importance of adopting a customer-centric approach to politics. By viewing citizens as customers, politicians can concentrate on addressing the needs and concerns of the public. Building trust and delivering tangible results become the primary objectives, fostering a more constructive and accountable political landscape.

In conclusion, the similarities between our two political parties and WrestleMania highlight the dramatic and the theatrical nature of contemporary politics. However, this captivating spectacle should not distract us from the urgent need for reform. Our current political system is polarized and dysfunctional, with a focus on winning at all costs, rather than solving the real issues faced by the nation.

The solutions proposed in The Politics Industry offer a transformative path forward. By introducing open primaries, ranked-choice voting, and independent redistricting commissions, we can foster a more competitive and representative political landscape. Non-partisan leadership and a customer-centric approach will ensure that politicians prioritize the needs of the people over party interests.

Ultimately, by embracing these reforms, we can break free from the WrestleMania-like spectacle and move toward a more constructive and accountable politics industry—one that prioritizes the well-being of the nation and its citizens above all else. Only through such meaningful reform can we revitalize democracy and ensure a brighter future for our society.

ChatGPT contributed substantially to writing this essay.

Read More

Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage
Why Fox News’ settlement with Dominion Voting Systems is good news for all media outlets
Getty Images

Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage

Last week, the ultraconservative news outlet, NewsMax, reached a $73 million settlement with the voting machine company, Dominion, in essence, admitting that they lied in their reporting about the use of their voting machines to “rig” or distort the 2020 presidential election. Not exactly shocking news, since five years later, there is no credible evidence to suggest any malfeasance regarding the 2020 election. To viewers of conservative media, such as Fox News, this might have shaken a fully embraced conspiracy theory. Except it didn’t, because those viewers haven’t seen it.

Many people have a hard time understanding why Trump enjoys so much support, given his outrageous statements and damaging public policy pursuits. Part of the answer is due to Fox News’ apparent censoring of stories that might be deemed negative to Trump. During the past five years, I’ve tracked dozens of examples of news stories that cast Donald Trump in a negative light, including statements by Trump himself, which would make a rational person cringe. Yet, Fox News has methodically censored these stories, only conveying rosy news that draws its top ratings.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Flag / artificial intelligence / technology / congress / ai

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Liberty and the General Welfare in the Age of AI

If the means justify the ends, we’d still be operating under the Articles of Confederation. The Founders understood that the means—the governmental structure itself—must always serve the ends of liberty and prosperity. When the means no longer served those ends, they experimented with yet another design for their government—they did expect it to be the last.

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity. Both of those goals were top of mind for early Americans. They demanded the Bill of Rights to protect the former, and they identified the latter—namely, the general welfare—as the animating purpose for the government. Both of those goals are being challenged by constitutional doctrines that do not align with AI development or even undermine it. A full review of those doctrines could fill a book (and perhaps one day it will). For now, however, I’m just going to raise two.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump-Era Budget Cuts Suspend UCLA Professor’s Mental Health Research Grant

Professor Carrie Bearden (on the left) at a Stand Up for Science rally in spring 2025.

Photo Provided

Trump-Era Budget Cuts Suspend UCLA Professor’s Mental Health Research Grant

UC Los Angeles Psychology professor Carrie Bearden is among many whose work has been stalled due to the Trump administration’s grant suspensions to universities across the country.

“I just feel this constant whiplash every single day,” Bearden said. “The bedrock, the foundation of everything that we're doing, is really being shaken on a daily basis … To see that at an institutional level is really shocking. Yes, we saw it coming with these other institutions, but I think everybody's still sort of in a state of shock.”

Keep ReadingShow less