Advocates for ranked-choice voting have picked up a crucially important ally. The New York Times, which has one of the most influential editorial pages in the country, delivered a full-throated endorsement Thursday for the most popular alternative to the current voting system.
Under the simple headline "The Primaries Are Just Dumb," the Times laid out a compelling case for both political partied to embrace RCV in their presidential primaries four years from now.
Calling it a "straightforward and elegant solution," the editorial board argued that ranked-choice votingwould guarantee that presidential nominees enjoy support from a majority of the primary voters, would increase civility in elections and would encourage candidates to reach beyond their core supporters.
"It is effective in any multicandidate race, but it's ideal for making sense of a large and fractured pool of candidates," the paper said.
This is not the first time the Times has backed RCV, but on this occasion the editorial board is making the case for a national rollout to replace the current system for selecting presidential nominees. In October, the Times endorsed an ultimately successful ballot initiative to install RCV for future city elections in the Big Apple.




















Rep. Haley Stevens speaks at the Michigan Democratic Party Endorsement Convention in Detroit, Michigan on April 19, 2026. (Andrew Roth/SIPA/AP)
Cecelia Terraza, 36, and her children, Maya, 3, and Rio, 5, hold signs during a rally for Dr. Abdul El-Sayed in Lansing Center, Michigan on July 19, 2026. (Rosem Morton for The 19th)
Rep. Haley Stevens talks to women working on the line as she tours the Webasto Plymouth Plant on May 1, 2026 in Plymouth, Michigan. (Sarah Rice/Getty Images)
The crowd cheers as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed and Sen. Bernie Sanders raise their hands during the “People vs. the Powerful” rally at the Lansing Center in Lansing, Michigan, on July 19, 2026. (Rosem Morton for The 19th)