Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Four states inch closer to redistricting reform

Anti-gerrymandering protest

A handful of states are in the final stretch to get anti-gerrymandering measures on the November ballot.

Sarah L. Voisin/Getty Images

Four states are on the cusp of approving anti-gerrymandering petitions for the November ballot, but challenges still remain.

Putting independent commissions, rather than politicians, in charge of drawing district maps is widely regarded as the most effective way to combat partisan gerrymandering. Next year, following the census, 14 states will use such commissions to draw state legislative districts, and eight will do so for congressional districts.

Getting on the November ballot and leaving it up to the voters is the last chance Arkansas, Nevada, North Dakota and Oregon have to make the switch to an independent redistricting commission before maps are redrawn for the new decade. But the Covid-19 pandemic has made gathering signatures to qualify for the ballot especially difficult.

Here are updates on redistricting reform campaigns in those states.


Arkansas Voters First

In early July, the group submitted almost 99,000 signatures for its redistricting reform ballot petition — 10,000 above the state requirement. But a week later Secretary of State John Thurston, a Republican, determined the group's submission was insufficient because there was an error with the state-mandated criminal background checks for petition canvassers.

Thurston said Arkansas Voters First's petition signatures cannot be counted because the group only certified that its canvassers had acquired a background check, not that they had passed one.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Last week, the redistricting reform group asked the state Supreme Court to step in and compel Thurston to count the signatures submitted. The group also asked for at least 30 more days to collect additional signatures.

People Not Politicians Oregon

The group leading the campaign in Oregon was granted a deadline extension and a lower signature threshold for its redistricting reform petition, after pushback from state officials and legal disputes.

Earlier this month, a federal district judge ruled the state must either accept the group's signatures as submitted or lower the threshold to 59,000 signatures and extend the deadline to Aug. 17. After initially opposing both options, Republican Secretary of State Bev Clarno ultimately went with the lower threshold and deadline extension.

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, a Democrat, also opposed the judge's decision and appealed to the 9th Circuit Court, which declined her request to allow People Not Politicians to continue gathering signatures for its petition.

North Dakota Voters First

The campaign submitted more than 36,000 signatures in early July for its ballot petition, which would establish an independent redistricting commission as well as other changes to the election process. State review of the signatures is ongoing.

Fair Maps Nevada

With a just over a week remaining before the deadline, the group needs to finish collecting at least 98,000 signatures for its redistricting reform petition. Last month, a federal judge granted a six-week extension until Aug. 5, but denied its request to gather signatures electronically.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less