Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Four states inch closer to redistricting reform

Anti-gerrymandering protest

A handful of states are in the final stretch to get anti-gerrymandering measures on the November ballot.

Sarah L. Voisin/Getty Images

Four states are on the cusp of approving anti-gerrymandering petitions for the November ballot, but challenges still remain.

Putting independent commissions, rather than politicians, in charge of drawing district maps is widely regarded as the most effective way to combat partisan gerrymandering. Next year, following the census, 14 states will use such commissions to draw state legislative districts, and eight will do so for congressional districts.

Getting on the November ballot and leaving it up to the voters is the last chance Arkansas, Nevada, North Dakota and Oregon have to make the switch to an independent redistricting commission before maps are redrawn for the new decade. But the Covid-19 pandemic has made gathering signatures to qualify for the ballot especially difficult.

Here are updates on redistricting reform campaigns in those states.


Arkansas Voters First

In early July, the group submitted almost 99,000 signatures for its redistricting reform ballot petition — 10,000 above the state requirement. But a week later Secretary of State John Thurston, a Republican, determined the group's submission was insufficient because there was an error with the state-mandated criminal background checks for petition canvassers.

Thurston said Arkansas Voters First's petition signatures cannot be counted because the group only certified that its canvassers had acquired a background check, not that they had passed one.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Last week, the redistricting reform group asked the state Supreme Court to step in and compel Thurston to count the signatures submitted. The group also asked for at least 30 more days to collect additional signatures.

People Not Politicians Oregon

The group leading the campaign in Oregon was granted a deadline extension and a lower signature threshold for its redistricting reform petition, after pushback from state officials and legal disputes.

Earlier this month, a federal district judge ruled the state must either accept the group's signatures as submitted or lower the threshold to 59,000 signatures and extend the deadline to Aug. 17. After initially opposing both options, Republican Secretary of State Bev Clarno ultimately went with the lower threshold and deadline extension.

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, a Democrat, also opposed the judge's decision and appealed to the 9th Circuit Court, which declined her request to allow People Not Politicians to continue gathering signatures for its petition.

North Dakota Voters First

The campaign submitted more than 36,000 signatures in early July for its ballot petition, which would establish an independent redistricting commission as well as other changes to the election process. State review of the signatures is ongoing.

Fair Maps Nevada

With a just over a week remaining before the deadline, the group needs to finish collecting at least 98,000 signatures for its redistricting reform petition. Last month, a federal judge granted a six-week extension until Aug. 5, but denied its request to gather signatures electronically.

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less