Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Burden of Survival and Pursuing Justice

The Burden of Survival and Pursuing Justice

A statue of Lady Justice.

Pixabay, WilliamCho

My neighbor was brutally attacked outside of his home one Friday night, when another resident, blasting loud music, yelled out his accusations, “You have been going through my things, you have been breaking into my home.” My neighbor gently told this man, “No, I have not gone through your things. Please lower your music.” His reply was a beating, fists that did great damage.

His wife was in the driveway, frozen. Horrified. Scared. She called the police and ran to her husband as the man fled.


My neighbor’s next memory begins at the County Hospital. His nose and several ribs were broken. He’s home now, bruised, bandaged—and still terrified. He asked why the police hadn’t acted. He had to call the police after the assault. He had to send them photos of his broken bones. The crime is a felony, but the police have no leads. I told my neighbor that this is too familiar in my field of work. When you are a victim, you become everything: The survivor, the patient, the detective, the crime scene investigator, the narrator.

The police asked him, why didn’t you have a camera? Why didn’t you let your dog out? Classic victim blaming.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Eventually, when he had to identify possible suspects, he was stressed: Could he recognize his attacker? Filing a civil restraining order was impossible because the police had not yet investigated the incident—or identified a suspect.

Welcome to my work, I said. Welcome to my world.

It is exhausting to be a victim.

Having to fight for your own survival is a tale as old as time. I hear it every day, and not just at work.

My neighbor’s story is far from unique. A teenager I know was the victim of a fight at school; her parents pushed the school for accommodations after the school did nothing. When I was in college, a friend was assaulted by her doctor. Years later, the burden to testify, to come forward, to try to stop him, was hers. Another friend suffered a beating outside of his place of employment. He had to track down security camera footage just to get the police to pay attention.

I know because I have practiced domestic violence law since 2004. Over the decades, the story is the same, always what the victim could or should have done differently.

Victim-blaming in the public sphere is brutal. Imagine when it happens at home. By your loved ones. Or by those who claim to love you. The blaming magnifies.

“Why didn’t you speak up?” They ask. “Why didn’t you tell anyone? Why did you marry that person?” Why why why.

A big part of our work is teaching survivors that the system is not fair. In the pursuit of justice, the system can hurt you more. Even in a crisis, you have to be your own advocate.

Plenty of information intended for people who experience domestic violence was applicable to my neighbor’s situation. I sharedall the information I hadon victim restitution, relocation assistance, security cameras, how to advocate with law enforcement, how to file a restraining order, and more. As helpful as the information might be, it forced him to take the time that he should have used for healing from the physical and emotional damage to become his own advocate. Even my offer rang hollow because all my well-intentioned advice shifted the burden from the authorities to my neighbor, the victim. I am proud to lead an organization that puts survivors first—but even I unintentionally burdened a victim, who should have been supported during a difficult time.

We can and must remove barriers to accessing justice.

During President Trump’s first administration, the failure to pursue white-collar crimes and cuts in the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) and related government funding had a massive impact on victims of crime, who now find it much more difficult to get access to legal aid. The Crime Victims Fund (CVF) did not pass the committee last session. We have another opportunity now to secure much-needed funding for victims of crime. Call or email your representatives now and urge them to pass this vital legislation. A similar law was enacted in California in 2024 to address the reduction in federal funding. It came into effect after a group of advocates urged their legislators to find funding to continue critical services—like keeping shelters and other related services for survivors running. Other states can use a similar model in the meantime. Congress must enact this law to continue to protect survivors.

On February 7, 2025, the Office on Violence Against Women, withdrew funding opportunities that had previously been available -- sustaining the toxic trend of blaming the victim.

Carmen McDonald is an attorney and the Executive Director of theSurvivor Justice Center; she is a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEdProject.

Read More

Campaign Legal Center Sues Elon Musk and DOGE

A scale of justice.

Getty Images, seng kui Lim / 500px

Campaign Legal Center Sues Elon Musk and DOGE

On March 5, 2025, the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) — on behalf of the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), OCA - Asian Pacific American Advocates, the Sierra Club and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) — sued Elon Musk and his so-called U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) for acting beyond their power to slash federal funding, dismantle federal agencies and fire federal employees.

Decisions regarding how the federal government spends its money lie with Congress. Elon Musk’s unchecked power throughout the federal government is a lawless threat to our democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Trump Administration’s Current Approach Discards the Rule of Law

A gavel and book.

Getty Images, May Lim / 500px

The Trump Administration’s Current Approach Discards the Rule of Law

President Donald Trump signed over 70 Executive Orders during the first thirty days of his second term, the most in a President’s first 100 days in 40 years. Many of the Executive Orders were sweeping in their scope and intentionally designed to fundamentally reshape the federal government and shatter the existing world order. Critics immediately claimed that many of the Executive Orders exceeded the President’s constitutional authority or contravened existing federal law.

At the same time, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—without Congressional authorization—has swept into multiple agencies, frozen Congressionally authorized appropriations, and terminated thousands of federal employees, many of whom are protected by civil service laws and collective bargaining agreements.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court Ruling Offers a Glimmer of Hope for the Rule of Law
Getty Images, David Talukdar

Supreme Court Ruling Offers a Glimmer of Hope for the Rule of Law

Tuesday, February 25, was a good day for Richard Glossip and the American people. On that day, the Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Glossip, who has been on Oklahoma’s death row since 1998. It also showed that even a MAGA-friendly court would still defend the rule of law when official misconduct was sufficiently egregious.

As CNN notes, “The Glossip case is arguably the highest-profile death penalty case to reach the court in years.” The decision was a surprise given the Court’s previous enthusiastic defense of death sentences and its willingness to turn the other cheek when confronted with cases in which public officials pushed to and beyond the limits of legality.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Time to Choose Sides

A gavel and a scale of justice.

Getty Images, Witoon Pongsit

A Time to Choose Sides

Donald Trump posted a picture of himself on social media next to a quote: “He who saves his Country violates no Law” [sic]. Attributed to Napoleon, the quote means that, with the right intentions, nothing should constrain executive power. It echoes statements by Vice President Vance and others that the administration need not abide by court orders blocking their illegal and unconstitutional actions.

These statements are nothing less than a complete rejection of the American system of government. As Americans see this rejection for what it is, they aren’t going to like it. A poll, released lastweek from Marquette University Law School, found that 83% of those surveyed—including 77% of Republicans—believe that the President must abide by court orders. It’s why it is critically important for all Americans to see these comments in this light, and act accordingly. Many people are doing it already. Here’s what everyone needs to understand.

Keep ReadingShow less