Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Red, White, and Blue-tiful: America's Sporting Hype

Opinion

Red, White, and Blue-tiful: America's Sporting Hype
Getty Images, vm

By now, you've seen the highlight reels: Christian Pulisic juking defenders like he's dodging TSA agents at JFK. Coco Gauff digging deep, her serve as fierce as her post-match interviews. The U.S. Women's National Team is still fighting for greater pay and respect, even after collecting more World Cup trophies than the men's team has, and still has excuses. It's another summer of global competition, and Team USA is, as always, performing for an audience of millions—many of whom only care about soccer every four years but will die on the hill that "we invented sportsmanship."

Welcome to the American sports paradox, where patriotism is a jersey worn as needed. We drape ourselves in flags when we win and drape our failures in "well, it's not our real sport anyway" when we lose. We're a nation obsessed with winning but allergic to the humility that comes with actually playing the world's games on the world's terms.


Take the Copa América. The U.S. men's team, fresh off a generational "rebuild," finds itself in a tournament with actual soccer countries—places where kids dribble on cracked pavement and worship at the altar of Diego Maradona, not Tom Brady. The U.S. team is scrappy, fast, and, if we're honest, still a little out of its league. The narrative, of course, is "growth," "promise," and "the beautiful game, American-style." Translation: we'll keep hosting tournaments and selling tickets, but don't hold your breath for a miracle on the pitch.

Our U.S. soccer experiment is the ultimate in cultural cosplay. We show up to international matches with chants, face paint, and an unwavering belief that our grit will overcome generations of technical skill. When it doesn't, we pivot, like only Americans can. "It's about the journey." "We're building something." Or my personal favorite: "Imagine if our best athletes played soccer!" (As if LeBron would trade his max contract for a life getting kicked in the shins in the Bundesliga.)

Then there's Wimbledon, where the lawns are immaculate, the strawberries overpriced, and American tennis is still searching for the Next Big Thing. Coco Gauff is a revelation—part prodigy, part prophet—carrying the torch through a landscape where the Williams sisters once reigned. Yet, the American tennis pipeline is more a drought than a deluge. We send over our best, they battle, and sometimes they win, but the days of American dominance are a sepia-toned memory trotted out by broadcasters like family vacation slides.

Wimbledon's polite, global crowd is a reminder: our sports heroes are ambassadors, willingly or not. Their victories are diplomatic notes; their losses are cautionary tales. We expect our athletes to play, protest, and perform patriotism with equal dexterity. And when they do—see the U.S. Women's National Team kneeling, speaking, and winning—we either lionize or demonize them, depending on how well their activism aligns with the storyline we prefer.

Sports is the last acceptable proxy war. Thus, this great American contradiction: we want our athletes to embody the best of us, but we're not always sure what that means. On the world stage, sports become the last acceptable proxy war—flags, anthems, and medal counts standing in for real diplomacy. Our national teams are avatars for pride but also lightning rods for every anxiety we have about our place in the world. Losing to Germany isn't just losing to Germany; it's an existential referendum on the American project.

And the spectacle is addictive. When Megan Rapinoe scores, it's a win for progressives. When she kneels, it's a Fox News segment. When LeBron James speaks about China, we suddenly remember that our athletes are also businessmen and that nationalism, in the end, is always for sale.

International sport could be a chance to recalibrate what national pride means—less about dominance and more about connection. But that would require a humility that doesn't fit well with our TV contracts. We want to win, we want to be loved, and we want to believe that our way of doing things is the way. When the rest of the world doesn't cooperate—when Spain's midfield out passes us, when a Jamaican sprinter leaves us in the dust—we're left with two choices: blame the system or learn something.

So, will the U.S. ever truly embrace the spirit of international sport? If we stop treating it like a showcase and start treating it like a conversation. Our athletes are more than billboards; they're bridges, whether we like it or not.

But for now, I'll keep watching. Not because I expect an American miracle, but because now and then, we get it right: a moment of grace, a flash of brilliance, a reminder that sport, at its best, is about more than flags and anthems. It's about showing up, playing hard, and—win or lose—having the guts to keep coming back.

That is a kind of American exceptionalism I believe in.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Bruce Springsteen In Concert, facing his audience.

Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band in concert at Nationals Park on May 27, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Paul Morigi / Getty Images

Springsteen’s October D.C. Festival Pushes Music Into Democracy Fight

Bruce Springsteen has always spoken his mind through politics and expressed it through his music. For decades, he has treated the stage as a platform for the causes he believes in — a place where songs become arguments, and performance becomes a form of public conscience. His work has long insisted that American culture and American democracy are intertwined, that the stories we tell ourselves shape the country we become. So when he steps onstage in October for the “Power to the People Festival” in Washington, D.C., it is likely that this will just be the next chapter in his lifelong effort to defend democratic values through art.

Bruce Springsteen has spent the past year making no secret of his views on the current administration, expressing them with increasing bluntness from the stage. His recent performances have shown that when he believes democracy is at risk, he does not whisper — he raises his voice. Given that history, no one should expect him to be quiet in October. So when he stepped onstage in Washington, D.C., and previewed the upcoming “Power to the People Festival,” it felt less like a surprise and more like the next verse in a long American tradition of artists using their platforms to defend democratic values.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Hollow Song for a Hollow Patriotism: Reclaiming the Real Patriotic Ballads
Imagine a democracy concert followed by a yearlong democracy call to action roadshow—designed to build a new civic movement
Getty Images, gilaxia

A Hollow Song for a Hollow Patriotism: Reclaiming the Real Patriotic Ballads

After musician after musician pulled out from Trump’s June 24 “Freedom 250” concert, we’re left with Lee Greenwood and an opera tenor. The anthem that made Greenwood a star, “God Bless the USA,” was written in 1985 during the height of the Cold War. It begins with the specter of loss—“If tomorrow—all the things were gone, I’d worked for all my life / And I had to start all over with my children and my wife.” Then the wounds disappear before they’re felt: “I’d thank my lucky stars to be living here today / Because the flag still stands for freedom and they can’t take that away.”

Ronald Reagan made the song his campaign theme while launching a new age of American inequality by systematically busting unions and cutting taxes for the wealthiest. Greenwood treats layoffs and the resulting toll on ordinary lives as a mere inconvenience. As the refrain shifts from violins and a church organ to a military march, he repeats, “I’m proud to be an American, where at least I know I’m free / And I won’t forget the men who died who gave that right to me.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Colbert’s Final Late Show Reveals What We’re Losing in Public Dialogue

Stephen Colbert attends the 51st Chaplin Award Gala honoring George Clooney at Alice Tully Hall, Lincoln Center on April 27, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images)

Colbert’s Final Late Show Reveals What We’re Losing in Public Dialogue

Stephen Colbert hosted The Late Show for the last time last week.

Tributes have been pouring in for Colbert’s nightly monologue and comedic genius. And rightly so. He has a unique and deeply humane way of making the unbearable bearable, giving us a little light and lift on our darkest days.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stapleton’s Colbert Performance Shows Power of Nonpolitical Messages

Chris Stapleton performs onstage during the 59th Annual CMA Awards at Bridgestone Arena on November 19, 2025 in Nashville, Tennessee..

(Photo by Astrida Valigorsky/WireImage)

Stapleton’s Colbert Performance Shows Power of Nonpolitical Messages

On May 6th, I watched Chris Stapleton perform “Living in the Promiseland” on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. The song, a Willie Nelson classic from 1985, hit me hard. Originally, Nelson released it at a time when debates about immigration and the American dream were in the headlines, and the song became an anthem of hope and inclusivity. These days, almost everything gets viewed through a political lens, but the song’s opening lines felt powerful without being political:

Give us your tired and weak, and we will make them strong
Bring us your foreign songs, and we will sing along
Leave us your broken dreams, we'll give them time to mend
There's still a lot of love living in the promised land

Keep ReadingShow less