Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The world depends on a strong American democracy

American flag over a world map background
artisteer/Getty Images

Piccone is an advisor to the Club de Madrid, a forum of democratic former presidents and prime ministers from over 70 countries, and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Tannon, a partners at DLA piper, is the board chair of the Club of Madrid Foundation.

The United States, as the world’s oldest and wealthiest democracy, continues to inspire people around the world who strive for greater freedom and prosperity. For that to continue, however, the United States must overcome its increasing polarization and dangerous slide toward populist nationalism.


As the American people face this pivotal election, we can revitalize the fundamental values of America’s founding — that all humans are born free and equal in dignity with inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These are the same principles now reflected in constitutions and treaties across the planet. Unfortunately, some political candidates are behaving in ways that fall far from this ideal, stoking greater division and cynicism.

If voters fail the stress test up and down November’s ballot, democracy in the United States and around the world will suffer. Tyrants from Moscow to Tehran will rejoice.

Causes for concern

As they have for centuries, people fleeing repression and poverty flock to the United States in search of a better life. Indeed, the U.S. economy, powered by dynamic entrepreneurs, the rule of law, technological breakthroughs and an influx of ambitious immigrants continues to surprise experts with its resilience and strength.

Yet our high levels of inequality and discrimination, foundering educational systems, polarizing social media, and slow and expensive legal processes signal weakness and stagnation. Rather than forging consensus on tackling these issues, politicians and malicious foreign actors exploit these weaknesses.

The alarming levels of dysfunction within the U.S. political system are of even greater concern. The list of structural defects impairing the U.S. model is long, from partisan gerrymandering and election administration to thinly regulated torrents of campaign money to factional control of legislative processes, such as the filibuster. It is not surprising, therefore, to see the United States backsliding on multiple indicators of political rights and rule of law compared to other countries.

Beyond these longer-term challenges lies a more immediate problem — the rise of leaders determined to pursue campaigns of grievance and antagonism. The rhetoric often borders on encouraging violence, instead of offering creative solutions rooted in consensus building.

As the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection revealed, America’s critical guardrails to protect against repeated attempts to undermine and disrupt constitutional norms and the rule of law are fragile or absent. Continuing to deny the outcome of a free and fair election after multiple failed legal attempts to challenge it is particularly grievous.

One can easily imagine the situation becoming worse, depending upon the outcome of November’s election and its aftermath. Some even promise the false virtues of a “strong man” above the rule of law, a conceivable prospect in light of the recent Supreme Court decision granting breathtaking immunity for “official” presidential acts and adding a presumption that all actions of a president are official. This is fundamentally dangerous to preserving the democratic principle that no one is above the law.

Americans of all stripes, and their leaders across our society, must determine how to confront such challenges. An awakened and educated citizenry, informed by independent media and aware of these historic choices, will be essential for American democracy to stabilize and reform.

The free world relies on America

As voters weigh their decisions, they should also consider the wider global context. Authoritarianism is on the rise in every global region and at its greatest height since the end of World War II. This movement is led by two countries dug into their own narrow agendas for regional and global superiority.

Vladimir Putin has made no secret of his ambition to recover the glory of “mother Russia” by attacking Ukraine, its sovereign and democratic neighbor. If Putin succeeds, other democratic neighbors of Russia would be his next targets.

In parallel, Xi Jinping seeks to protect his and the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power at home, as well as reshape global institutions in the party’s image. Other autocrats cling to power by rigging elections, repressing the media or eliminating opponents, as in Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Iran and Venezuela. America’s calling should be to resist such authoritarian regimes and offer the world a viable democratic alternative.

In the face of hostility from neo-authoritarians, the contest for a rules-based international order demands a committed coalition of democratic states that includes a healthy and reliable United States. The world sought by the neo-authoritarians is one riddled with human rights abuses and impunity to repress and pilfer.

In contrast, the world built by democracies is more open, more cooperative, and more inclusive of diverse ideas and cultures. It is also founded on positive societal practices within borders, in which people are encouraged to create businesses, respect the law and pursue their dreams. In short, to live in dignity, peace and freedom, to solve problems rather than to perpetuate them

The continued progress of the American experiment in self-governance will be crucial to upholding the vision of a world in which rules matter and human rights are respected, where individuals are citizens and not manipulated subjects. Without America’s political, economic and military power — and the inspiration of its example — other democracies around the world will struggle to stave off authoritarian challenges.


Read More

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

circa 1770: The English-born American revolutionary philosopher Thomas Paine, (1737 - 1809), who wrote and published 'The Rights of Man', (1791 - 1792), in England. In it he expressed his support for the French Revolution and called for the overthrow of the British monarchy.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

The 50501 Movement can be viewed as a 21st-century manifestation of the anti-authoritarian, pro-egalitarian framework that Thomas Paine championed in Common Sense. Both movements share a core belief in challenging entrenched power and mobilizing the collective voice of everyday people to defend democracy. By utilizing decentralized, nationwide grassroots mobilization to challenge executive overreach and billionaire consolidation, the 50501 movement directly echoes Paine’s anti-authoritarianism, his belief in collective civic power, and his demand that power remains in the hands of the people.

The 50501 Movement mirrors the spirit of Paine’s Common Sense through three primary parallels:

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video I Voted Today paper sticker on mans finger on rustic wooden table

How class, identity, and political recognition shaped the Democratic Party's relationship with rural white working-class voters over two decades.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

The Thousand Injuries: The Not-Qwhite Voter and the Politics of Recognition

In the fall of 2003, Howard Dean said he wanted to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in the back windows of their pickup trucks. It was clumsy but not dishonest. He meant that his party had written off a whole category of American voter and wanted to change that. He was attacked at once, mostly by his own side, and walked it back within forty-eight hours. The lesson his party drew was not that the outreach had been badly phrased; It was that the outreach itself was impermissible, that to pursue the rural white working class voter was to be complicit with everything he was presumed to represent. Dean was the last major Democrat to try, and the consequences have accumulated in the shape of the electoral map.

Edgar Allan Poe understood something the party still does not. "The Cask of Amontillado" opens with a line that ought to hang in every campaign office: the thousand injuries of Fortunato the narrator had borne as best he could, but when Fortunato ventured upon insult, he vowed revenge. Injuries can be borne as long as the injured man believes his tormentors still regard his suffering as real. The insult is different. It reframes the injuries as deserved, telling the sufferer he is the kind of person who deserves to suffer. Poe's narrator does not recalculate his interests; he takes his revenge at great cost to himself. That is not irrational but human, and it is the most precise framework we have for what has happened to rural white working-class voters over the last twenty years.

Keep ReadingShow less