Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The world depends on a strong American democracy

American flag over a world map background
artisteer/Getty Images

Piccone is an advisor to the Club de Madrid, a forum of democratic former presidents and prime ministers from over 70 countries, and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Tannon, a partners at DLA piper, is the board chair of the Club of Madrid Foundation.

The United States, as the world’s oldest and wealthiest democracy, continues to inspire people around the world who strive for greater freedom and prosperity. For that to continue, however, the United States must overcome its increasing polarization and dangerous slide toward populist nationalism.


As the American people face this pivotal election, we can revitalize the fundamental values of America’s founding — that all humans are born free and equal in dignity with inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These are the same principles now reflected in constitutions and treaties across the planet. Unfortunately, some political candidates are behaving in ways that fall far from this ideal, stoking greater division and cynicism.

If voters fail the stress test up and down November’s ballot, democracy in the United States and around the world will suffer. Tyrants from Moscow to Tehran will rejoice.

Causes for concern

As they have for centuries, people fleeing repression and poverty flock to the United States in search of a better life. Indeed, the U.S. economy, powered by dynamic entrepreneurs, the rule of law, technological breakthroughs and an influx of ambitious immigrants continues to surprise experts with its resilience and strength.

Yet our high levels of inequality and discrimination, foundering educational systems, polarizing social media, and slow and expensive legal processes signal weakness and stagnation. Rather than forging consensus on tackling these issues, politicians and malicious foreign actors exploit these weaknesses.

The alarming levels of dysfunction within the U.S. political system are of even greater concern. The list of structural defects impairing the U.S. model is long, from partisan gerrymandering and election administration to thinly regulated torrents of campaign money to factional control of legislative processes, such as the filibuster. It is not surprising, therefore, to see the United States backsliding on multiple indicators of political rights and rule of law compared to other countries.

Beyond these longer-term challenges lies a more immediate problem — the rise of leaders determined to pursue campaigns of grievance and antagonism. The rhetoric often borders on encouraging violence, instead of offering creative solutions rooted in consensus building.

As the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection revealed, America’s critical guardrails to protect against repeated attempts to undermine and disrupt constitutional norms and the rule of law are fragile or absent. Continuing to deny the outcome of a free and fair election after multiple failed legal attempts to challenge it is particularly grievous.

One can easily imagine the situation becoming worse, depending upon the outcome of November’s election and its aftermath. Some even promise the false virtues of a “strong man” above the rule of law, a conceivable prospect in light of the recent Supreme Court decision granting breathtaking immunity for “official” presidential acts and adding a presumption that all actions of a president are official. This is fundamentally dangerous to preserving the democratic principle that no one is above the law.

Americans of all stripes, and their leaders across our society, must determine how to confront such challenges. An awakened and educated citizenry, informed by independent media and aware of these historic choices, will be essential for American democracy to stabilize and reform.

The free world relies on America

As voters weigh their decisions, they should also consider the wider global context. Authoritarianism is on the rise in every global region and at its greatest height since the end of World War II. This movement is led by two countries dug into their own narrow agendas for regional and global superiority.

Vladimir Putin has made no secret of his ambition to recover the glory of “mother Russia” by attacking Ukraine, its sovereign and democratic neighbor. If Putin succeeds, other democratic neighbors of Russia would be his next targets.

In parallel, Xi Jinping seeks to protect his and the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power at home, as well as reshape global institutions in the party’s image. Other autocrats cling to power by rigging elections, repressing the media or eliminating opponents, as in Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Iran and Venezuela. America’s calling should be to resist such authoritarian regimes and offer the world a viable democratic alternative.

In the face of hostility from neo-authoritarians, the contest for a rules-based international order demands a committed coalition of democratic states that includes a healthy and reliable United States. The world sought by the neo-authoritarians is one riddled with human rights abuses and impunity to repress and pilfer.

In contrast, the world built by democracies is more open, more cooperative, and more inclusive of diverse ideas and cultures. It is also founded on positive societal practices within borders, in which people are encouraged to create businesses, respect the law and pursue their dreams. In short, to live in dignity, peace and freedom, to solve problems rather than to perpetuate them

The continued progress of the American experiment in self-governance will be crucial to upholding the vision of a world in which rules matter and human rights are respected, where individuals are citizens and not manipulated subjects. Without America’s political, economic and military power — and the inspiration of its example — other democracies around the world will struggle to stave off authoritarian challenges.

Read More

Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi
- YouTube

Defining The Democracy Movement: Rahmin Sarabi

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's interview series engages diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This initiative is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

The latest interview in this series features Rahmin Sarabi, founder and Director of the American Public Trust, an organization dedicated to promoting and implementing deliberative democracy practices, such as citizen assemblies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Why Recognizing the State of Palestine Does Not “Reward Hamas”

President Donald Trump finally acknowledged there is “real starvation” in Gaza—a reality that has generated momentum among holdout countries to recognize a State of Palestine, as 147 of 193 U.N. members have already done. Trump claims that this impermissibly “rewards Hamas.” Concerns about the optics of “rewarding” a militant group that is not the country’s government should not drive the decision to recognize Palestine as a state or the decision to maintain diplomatic relations with its government.

Countries that have already recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and the fact that the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) forms a defined geographic area with a government and a population—the traditional criteria for statehood. Countries that have not recognized the State of Palestine point to the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) lack of effective control over parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and to the idea that recognition can be used as future diplomatic leverage. But waiting to recognize a state of Palestine until after there is a negotiated agreement between Israel and the PA is an outdated position that amounts to “kicking the can” down an interminable road.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Expand Democracy 5

The Expand Democracy 5

RCV Critics, the “Re-Gerrymander”, Citizen Initiatives, Deliberative Democracy

Welcome to the latest edition of The Expand Democracy 5. In August, the Expand Democracy team will be taking a break from creating new content, but we look forward to sharing grouped content from this year’s editions that they believe still remains relevant. Today's stories include:

🗳️ Deep dive: Ranked choice voting and its critics

Keep ReadingShow less
Girls drawing an American flag with chalk
United States continues to be a ‘flawed democracy’ in annual study
LWA/Dann Tardif/Getty Images

Innovating America’s Democracy Is Our Tradition and Our Responsibility

The American story is one of constant innovation and renewal, where democracy rises to meet the challenges of each new age. Our history documents a journey of transformation, inviting us to reflect on centuries of innovation in American democracy. Citizens have routinely amended outdated practices, reinforced core tenets, and forged new institutions. Our story highlights that reform is not only possible—it is tradition.

As we celebrate America’s 250th year, which began on July 4, 2025, we must also reflect on the nature of innovations in our democracy as a platform for encouraging Americans to embrace the next phase of reform. If we are successful in adding a new set of reforms to the historical arc, ones that remove the overly partisan influences on our electoral system, we might be able to reverse the hyperpartisan spiral George Washington warned us about; and we may re-align our electoral incentives to promote the kind of cooperation among elected leaders that might allow us to have on-time responsible budgets and the kinds of practical policies the country needs. It feels like a daunting task, but our forebears often tackled what were monumental revisions to our democracy in their times. And it would be a shame to let the 250th anniversary of our country come and go without taking up the charge given to us by those who came before us, the responsibility to leave our generation’s mark on our improving democracy. We have all the tools and ideas we need. We must decide if we have the will.

Keep ReadingShow less