Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The world depends on a strong American democracy

American flag over a world map background
artisteer/Getty Images

Piccone is an advisor to the Club de Madrid, a forum of democratic former presidents and prime ministers from over 70 countries, and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Tannon, a partners at DLA piper, is the board chair of the Club of Madrid Foundation.

The United States, as the world’s oldest and wealthiest democracy, continues to inspire people around the world who strive for greater freedom and prosperity. For that to continue, however, the United States must overcome its increasing polarization and dangerous slide toward populist nationalism.


As the American people face this pivotal election, we can revitalize the fundamental values of America’s founding — that all humans are born free and equal in dignity with inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These are the same principles now reflected in constitutions and treaties across the planet. Unfortunately, some political candidates are behaving in ways that fall far from this ideal, stoking greater division and cynicism.

If voters fail the stress test up and down November’s ballot, democracy in the United States and around the world will suffer. Tyrants from Moscow to Tehran will rejoice.

Causes for concern

As they have for centuries, people fleeing repression and poverty flock to the United States in search of a better life. Indeed, the U.S. economy, powered by dynamic entrepreneurs, the rule of law, technological breakthroughs and an influx of ambitious immigrants continues to surprise experts with its resilience and strength.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Yet our high levels of inequality and discrimination, foundering educational systems, polarizing social media, and slow and expensive legal processes signal weakness and stagnation. Rather than forging consensus on tackling these issues, politicians and malicious foreign actors exploit these weaknesses.

The alarming levels of dysfunction within the U.S. political system are of even greater concern. The list of structural defects impairing the U.S. model is long, from partisan gerrymandering and election administration to thinly regulated torrents of campaign money to factional control of legislative processes, such as the filibuster. It is not surprising, therefore, to see the United States backsliding on multiple indicators of political rights and rule of law compared to other countries.

Beyond these longer-term challenges lies a more immediate problem — the rise of leaders determined to pursue campaigns of grievance and antagonism. The rhetoric often borders on encouraging violence, instead of offering creative solutions rooted in consensus building.

As the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection revealed, America’s critical guardrails to protect against repeated attempts to undermine and disrupt constitutional norms and the rule of law are fragile or absent. Continuing to deny the outcome of a free and fair election after multiple failed legal attempts to challenge it is particularly grievous.

One can easily imagine the situation becoming worse, depending upon the outcome of November’s election and its aftermath. Some even promise the false virtues of a “strong man” above the rule of law, a conceivable prospect in light of the recent Supreme Court decision granting breathtaking immunity for “official” presidential acts and adding a presumption that all actions of a president are official. This is fundamentally dangerous to preserving the democratic principle that no one is above the law.

Americans of all stripes, and their leaders across our society, must determine how to confront such challenges. An awakened and educated citizenry, informed by independent media and aware of these historic choices, will be essential for American democracy to stabilize and reform.

The free world relies on America

As voters weigh their decisions, they should also consider the wider global context. Authoritarianism is on the rise in every global region and at its greatest height since the end of World War II. This movement is led by two countries dug into their own narrow agendas for regional and global superiority.

Vladimir Putin has made no secret of his ambition to recover the glory of “mother Russia” by attacking Ukraine, its sovereign and democratic neighbor. If Putin succeeds, other democratic neighbors of Russia would be his next targets.

In parallel, Xi Jinping seeks to protect his and the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power at home, as well as reshape global institutions in the party’s image. Other autocrats cling to power by rigging elections, repressing the media or eliminating opponents, as in Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Iran and Venezuela. America’s calling should be to resist such authoritarian regimes and offer the world a viable democratic alternative.

In the face of hostility from neo-authoritarians, the contest for a rules-based international order demands a committed coalition of democratic states that includes a healthy and reliable United States. The world sought by the neo-authoritarians is one riddled with human rights abuses and impunity to repress and pilfer.

In contrast, the world built by democracies is more open, more cooperative, and more inclusive of diverse ideas and cultures. It is also founded on positive societal practices within borders, in which people are encouraged to create businesses, respect the law and pursue their dreams. In short, to live in dignity, peace and freedom, to solve problems rather than to perpetuate them

The continued progress of the American experiment in self-governance will be crucial to upholding the vision of a world in which rules matter and human rights are respected, where individuals are citizens and not manipulated subjects. Without America’s political, economic and military power — and the inspiration of its example — other democracies around the world will struggle to stave off authoritarian challenges.

Read More

Public Perspectives: Trump Presidency

U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to watch the Ultimate Fighting Championship at the Kaseya Center on April 12, 2025 in Miami, Florida.

(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Public Perspectives: Trump Presidency

Ahead of Election Day 2024, the Fulcrum launched We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials.

Now, we continue the series to learn if the Donald Trump administration is meeting the voters' motivations for voting in the 2024 presidential election.

Keep ReadingShow less
CO lawmakers work to protect voter rights after Trump elections order

More than 95% of all voters in the United States use paper ballots in elections.

Adobe Stock

CO lawmakers work to protect voter rights after Trump elections order

Some Colorado lawmakers are scrambling to protect voter rights after President Donald Trump issued an executive order to require proof of citizenship to register to vote. They say the requirement would disproportionately affect low-income voters and people of color.

David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, said the language in the U.S. Constitution is very clear that the authority to run elections is delegated to individual states.

"Everyone - Republican, Democrat, liberal, conservative - wants to keep ineligible voters off the list. And there's always some value in discussing how to do it better," he explained. "Unfortunately that's not what this executive order does. It's really a remarkable seizure of power from the states."

Trump has cast doubt on the integrity of American elections for years, despite evidence that fraud is extremely rare. The new order claims the nation has failed "to enforce basic and necessary election protections," and would allow the Department of Homeland Security and 'DOGE' to access state voter rolls. Colorado Senate Bill 1 - which would bar voter discrimination based on race, sexual orientation or gender identity - has cleared the state Senate and now moves to the House.

Becker noted that Congress does have constitutional authority to change election rules, and did so most notably after passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. And in 2021, he says House Democrats passed a sweeping set of election reforms that ended up dying in the Senate.

"But at least that was done through congressional action. What we have here is an executive power grab - an attempt by the President of the United States to dictate to states how they run elections, how they should exercise the power that is granted to them by the Constitution," he continued.

Becker noted the new order suggests serious misunderstandings, intentional or not, about the nation's election system, which he says is secure. It's already illegal for non-U.S. citizens to vote, and voter lists are as accurate as they've ever been. More than 95% of all U.S. voters use paper ballots, which are available in all states, and ballots are audited to confirm results.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pressing Issue of Distinction Overload

Multicolored megaphones.

Getty Images, MicroStockHub

The Pressing Issue of Distinction Overload

We live in a time of distinction overload, namely a proliferation of distinctions that are employed in all aspects of contemporary political, economic, and social life. Distinction Overload—let's name it—is overwhelming citizens who pay attention to workplace dynamics, politics, and family life. Distinction Overload is a relative of information overload, associated with the Information Age itself, which is a descendant of the information explosion that occurred during the Renaissance after Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press.

You can’t really talk or write, let alone think, without making distinctions, and the process of human development itself is very much about learning useful distinctions—me and you, left and right, good and evil, night and day, yes and no, mother and father, humans, fish and animals, and so on. Some distinctions reflect opposition; others divide reality or ethics into three or four or more categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just The Facts: Financial Facts on NATO and the U.S.

Different currencies.

Getty Images, bernardbodo

Just The Facts: Financial Facts on NATO and the U.S.

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

In early March, President Donald Trump once again called into question a fundamental principle of the NATO security alliance: that an attack on one member of NATO is an attack on all nations.

Keep ReadingShow less