Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

'Friendship with this world, ever more perfect'

Friends sitting together
Maki Nakamura/Getty Images

Willis is the founder and director of Oregon's Kitchen Table at Portland State University and executive director of the Deliberative Democracy Consortium. She is the author of a textbook, a book of essays and two books of poems.

Sometimes I play a game with myself, particularly if I’m sitting alone in a coffee shop or standing in line at the post office. I look at each person who passes by and think: “Are you my friend? What about you? What about the woman with the raspberry-colored sweater tied around her shoulders? What about that man with the beanie pulled down over his eyebrows? What about that couple speaking Arabic?” (“Oh no,” I’ll think, “how will I know if we are friends? I wish I spoke Arabic.”)

It is a bit like Adam Zagajewski’s poem, “Impossible Friendships,” a melancholy meditation on those he will never know (and the source of this column's title), like “the old man sipping coffee/in St.-Lazare, who reminds you of someone.” Except my game is the opposite, the sunny-side-of-the-street version. Maybe we could be friends. Maybe we already are friends. Maybe we just don’t know it yet.


Now, let me admit this up front: I am prosperous in the friends department. Except for a few years involving teaching abroad and law school, I have seen my best friend nearly every week since we were 18 years old. I met my closest friend from childhood before we started kindergarten, and we kept each other laughing all the way to high school graduation. I have dear friends from grade school and middle school and high school and college and law school and work and writing and the neighborhood. In this, I know I am particularly blessed, and this Thanksgiving, it is one of my deepest gratitudes.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

I’ve been thinking about the gifts of friendship a lot lately, particularly since the release of the State of American Friendship Survey last summer. There is a great deal to be learned from that survey nearly two years into the isolation caused by a global pandemic, but the big takeaway is that Americans have fewer friends than they did in 1990, in some cases many fewer friends. In fact, 12 percent of Americans report that they have no close friends at all, up from 3 percent in 1990, and only 13 percent report that they have 10 or more close friends, down from 33 percent in 1990. The rest of us lie somewhere in the middle, with 41 percent reporting that they have three to five friends, and another 12 percent saying that they have six to nine close friends.

I’m trying to make sense of all that, because certainly the quality of one’s friendships can’t solely be determined by the number of friends one can count. But only half of Americans are satisfied with the number of friends they have, and nearly all measures of friendship — both quantity and quality — have declined sharply since 1990. There are plenty of ways to consider the implications of this study for Americans and their well-being. But of course, being me, I also wonder: What does this mean for American democracy? I don’t want to skitter into sugary stories of partisan combatants making friends across the aisle, members of Congress going on bipartisan buddy trips, or Mary Matalin/James-Carville love affairs. But I do have a deep sense that friendship — being friends, making friends — is intertwined with our ability to live together and make decisions together, with our ability to justly govern ourselves.

I love the expression “to make friends,” as in have you made any friends at your new school yet? It’s a homely and human-scaled thing to make something, as in make do or make a cake or make a valentine out of a doily. I love it when artists and chefs and craftspeople refer to themselves collectively as “makers.” “To make friends” is not only quaint and anachronistic, but it also invokes a kind of joint creation, a shared space in which two people — or three or four — gather together to build something or bake it or form it out of clay.

That sounds a bit like what we are called to do in a robust and humanistic democracy, doesn’t it? But what does it mean if we aren’t making friends? If friendship itself is on the wane? And what are the parallels to and implications for democratic life?

Certainly we have seen a lot of evidence of Americans behaving badly — and in many cases dangerously — in recent days. Twitter and TikTok and cable news are brimming with shouting matches over where and when and how to wear masks, fans harassing players in basketball arenas, airplane passengers getting into fisticuffs and, of course, outright racist and xenophobic attacks on Asian Americans and others. Schools have closed down because there are too many fights among classmates, and in one instance a principal was beaten unconscious by a student.

It’s as if we are all coiled into a hostile crouch, just ready to pounce on those who we even slightly disagree with or view as fundamentally different from ourselves. We’re giving each person we encounter the side-eye, preparing to uncork whatever bottled-up fury we have been saving for just such an occasion.

No wonder we’re having a hard time making friends. And no wonder our democracy seems to be teetering on the brink.

Opening ourselves to friendship is a hopeful and vulnerable stance toward the world. It requires us to take a step toward something — toward someone — not knowing what the outcome will be. It requires us to risk rejection or misunderstanding or heartbreak. It requires us to reveal ourselves — including our soft spots — to someone who is not kin. It requires us to say by word or deed: I like you. I care about you. Is it possible you could like me back? At the core, making friends is a precarious act, an irrational act, a radical act.

Opening ourselves to friendship is the opposite of the hostile crouch. It is the unfurling of ourselves in the direction of another. It is having faith in someone we don’t already know. It is reaching toward them with an open hand and beckoning them just a little closer.

And I suspect that a similar unfurling, an unclenching of the jaw and fist, may also be what our democracy needs from us in these antagonistic times. As with the delicate dance of friendship, hope for democracy and personal vulnerability in the face of a cantankerous national mood is not easy, and for some of us, it might just be a bit too dangerous. But for those of us who can, shall we look around the post office — shall we look around the country — and ask that unsuspecting stranger: Are you my friend?

Read More

Candace Asher

Singer/songwriter Candace Asher

Presenting 'This Country Tis of Thee'

As we approach another presidential election, less than 120 days away, uncivil, dysfunctional behaviors continue to divide the nation. Each side blaming the other is never going to unite us.

As the rancor and divide between Americans increases, we need to stop focusing on our differences. The Fulcrum underscores the imperative that we find the common bonds of our humanity — those can, do and must bind us together.

There are many examples in the American Songbook that brought folks together in previous times of great strife and discord, including “Imagine,” “Heal the World,” “Love Can Build a Bridge,” “The Great Divide” and, of course, “We Are the World.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Sutherland, Jane Fonda and others on stage

Donald Sutherland (left), Paul Mooney, and Jane Fonda performing in an anti-Vietnam War FTA (Free The Army) show in the Philippines in 1971.

Stuart Lutz/Gado/Getty Images

This young GI met Donald Sutherland in a bygone era. RIP to an original.

Page is an American journalist, syndicated columnist and senior member of the Chicago Tribune editorial board.

News of Donald Sutherland's death at age 88 took me back to a day in 1971 when he was protesting the Vietnam War onstage with Jane Fonda and I was one of about 1,000 off-duty soldiers in their audience.

I hoped, in the spirit of John Lennon's anthem, to give peace a chance.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taylor Swift singing on stage
John Shearer/TAS24/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management

Taylor Swift: 'It's basically saying don't lose hope'

Daley-Harris is the author of “Reclaiming Our Democracy: Every Citizen’sGuide to Transformational Advocacy” and the founder of RESULTS and Civic Courage. This is part of a series focused on better understanding transformational advocacy: citizens awakening to their power.

In my last writing, I discussed how Taylor Swift’s first involvement in politics (during the 2018 midterm election in Tennessee) was prompted, in part, by her harrowing experience in a sexual assault trial. That year Swift endorsed Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn’s opponent in Tennessee’s U.S. Senate race, Rep. Jim Cooper (D). It wasn’t an easy decision.

“I’ve been reluctant to publicly voice my political opinions,” she wrote in an Instagram post, “but due to several events in my life and in the world in the past two years, I feel very differently about that now. I always have and always will cast my vote based on which candidate will protect and fight for the human rights I believe we all deserve in this country. I believe in the fight for LGBTQ rights, and that any form of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender is WRONG. I believe that the systemic racism we still see in this country towards people of color is terrifying, sickening and prevalent.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Young woman doing stand-up comedy

Laughter is the embodiment of depolarization.

FG Trade/Getty Images

What role does comedy play in pulling us together?

It’s no secret that pop culture in America has amazing healing and connecting powers. Throughout history, we’ve seen how artists, entertainers, athletes and creators of every kind invite us into a space of transcendence that leads to connectivity. We see that when we join people together their energy can be harnessed for good, and then amplified and scaled.

Certainly comedy fits in perfectly. Laughter is the embodiment of depolarization. Just consider that in order for something to evoke laughter, it has to have the capacity to both hold tension and release tension at the same time. And so we invite you to join Bridge Entertainment Labs tomorrow at 4 pm Eastern for “What’s Making Us Laugh? What Role Does Comedy Play in Pulling Us Together — or Driving Us Apart?”

Keep ReadingShow less