Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Book review: 'Sustaining While Disrupting: The Challenge of Congregational Innovation'

book cover

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

This summer, I'm excited to explore a series of reviews highlighting the most impactful and thought-provoking books on my reading list. These works, ranging from spiritual guidance to social commentary, have the potential to enrich our minds, broaden our viewpoints, and inspire us to take action. First on the list is “ Sustaining While Disrupting: The Challenge of Congregational Innovation ” by F. Douglas Powe and Lovett H. Weems Jr.


This theologically grounded guide offers practical wisdom for faith practitioners striving to balance tradition and innovation, addressing the broader challenge of cultivating institutions that provide stability in chaotic times while propelling us toward a more just future. Whether you're a person of faith, a social entrepreneur, or a concerned citizen, the book's insights are not only inspiring but also deeply relevant to our current societal climate.

Powe and Weems, seasoned church leaders, contend that congregations must learn to sustain their core traditions and mission while also disrupting the status quo to remain vibrant and relevant. It requires a delicate balance between honoring one's heritage and embracing innovation, comforting the afflicted, and afflicting the comfortable.

The authors don't just theorize — they draw extensively from their own experiences, as well as those of other congregations, to illuminate the challenges and opportunities of sustaining while disrupting. They offer practical, actionable strategies for assessing a congregation's readiness for change, building consensus, and implementing innovations in areas like worship, leadership, and community engagement. These strategies are not just theoretical, but have been tested and proven effective in real-world situations.

What sets this book apart is its unique theological depth. Powe and Weems are not your typical management consultants with a faith veneer. They bring a distinct perspective, grounding their approach in a profound understanding of Christian scripture and tradition, particularly the prophetic call to justice and compassion. This theological depth is not just for faith communities, but for all who seek a deeper understanding of the world and their place in it.

This is what makes “Sustaining While Disrupting” not just a book for faith practitioners, but a crucial read for social entrepreneurs, citizen activists and all who care about the health of our democratic republic. In an era marked by deep divisions and rapid change, we urgently need institutions that can both ground us in a sense of history and purpose, and propel us toward a more just and equitable future. The time to act is now, and this book provides the guidance we need.

As we navigate the tensions between our "is-ness" and our "ought-ness," between the realities of our past and the promise of our potential, the church can be a unique source of wisdom and leadership. By sustaining our deepest values and traditions, we can find the courage and resilience to disrupt our society's injustices and inequalities. By embracing innovation and experimentation, we can help build a world more aligned with God's vision of love, justice and peace.

Of course, this journey is full of risks and challenges. Powe and Weems are candid about their obstacles, from resistance to change to the danger of burnout. They remind us that sustaining while disrupting is not a destination but a continuous process that requires discernment, creativity and perseverance.

Ultimately, "Sustaining While Disrupting" is a hopeful and challenging book, just like the church at its best. It invites us to embrace the tension between tradition and innovation, not as a source of paralysis but as a wellspring of renewal and transformation. It reminds us that the church, faithful to its deepest calling, can be a powerful force for good in the world — a source of comfort and disruption, a beacon of hope from our "is-ness" to our "ought-ness."

As someone who has dedicated their life to this work, I am deeply grateful for the wisdom and guidance that Powe and Weems offer. Their book is a gift for faith practitioners and all who care about the future of our congregations, our communities, and our shared democracy. It is a reminder that, even in the most challenging times, the church can sustain grace and disrupt love — a catalyst for the transformation of ourselves and the world around us.


Read More

Who’s Responsible When AI Causes Harm?: Unpacking the Federal AI Liability Framework Debate
the letters are made up of different colors

Who’s Responsible When AI Causes Harm?: Unpacking the Federal AI Liability Framework Debate

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key takeaways

  • The U.S. has no national AI liability law. Instead, a patchwork of state laws has emerged which has resulted in legal protections being dependent on where an individual resides.
  • It’s often unclear who is legally responsible when AI causes harm. This gap leaves many people with no clear path to seek help.
  • In March 2026, the White House and Congress introduced major proposals to establish a federal standard, but there is significant disagreement about whether that standard should prioritize protecting innovation or protecting people harmed by AI systems.

Background: A Patchwork of State Laws

Without a national AI law, states have been filling in the gaps on their own. The result is an uneven landscape where a person’s legal protections depend entirely on which state they live in.

Keep ReadingShow less
Teenager admiring electronic hobby robot.

Explore how China is overtaking the U.S. in the global innovation race, from electric vehicles to advanced research, and why America’s fragmented science policy, talent loss, and weak industrial strategy threaten its technological leadership.

Getty Images, Willie B. Thomas

America’s Greatest Geopolitical Blind Spot

The global hierarchy of innovation is undergoing a structural shift that Washington is dangerously slow to acknowledge. For decades, the prevailing narrative in the United States was that China was merely the "world’s factory"—a nation capable of mass-producing Western designs but inherently lacking the creative spark to invent its own. This assumption has been shattered. Today, Beijing is no longer playing catch-up; in sectors ranging from electric vehicles and next-generation nuclear power to hypersonic missiles, China is setting the pace.

The central challenge is that China has mastered the entire innovation ecosystem, while the United States has allowed its own to fracture. Innovation is not just about a "eureka" moment in a laboratory; it is a relay race that begins with basic scientific research, moves through the training of specialized talent, and ends with the large-scale commercialization of "hard tech." China is currently winning every leg of that race.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a person standing alone on a platform and looking at speech bubbles.

A bold critique of modern democracy and rising authoritarian ideas, exploring how AI-powered swarm digital democracy could redefine participation and governance.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

The Only Radical Move Forward: Swarm Digital Democracy

We are increasingly told that democracy has failed and that its time has passed. The evidence proffered is everywhere, we are told: Gridlock, captured institutions, performative elections, a public that senses, correctly, that its voice rarely translates into real power. Into this vacuum step dystopic movements like the Dark Enlightenment and harder strains of Right-wing populism, offering a stark diagnosis and an even starker cure: Abandon the illusion of popular rule and return to forms of authority that are decisive, hierarchical, and unapologetically exclusionary. They present themselves as bold, clear-eyed, rambunctious, alive, and willing to act where others hesitate. And all to save the world from itself.

But this framing depends on a sleight of hand: It assumes that what we have been living under is, in fact, democracy, and that its failures are the failures of democracy itself. That is the first mistake.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judge's Gavel Hammer as a Symbol of Law and Order with Processor CPU AI Chip.

Elon Musk’s xAI company is challenging AI regulations in Colorado after losing in California, arguing that limits on artificial intelligence violate free speech. As Connecticut enforces its own AI law, this case could shape the future of AI regulation, corporate accountability, and constitutional rights in the United States.

Getty Images, Alexander Sikov

xAI Pushes Free Speech Theory Into New AI Lawsuits

Elon Musk's AI company, xAI, is on a legal road trip. After losing in California, it filed suit in Colorado asking a court to declare the state's artificial intelligence regulations unconstitutional. The argument is essentially the same one that already failed. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.

For Connecticut residents, this is not just the next state in the alphabet that has passed AI legislation. Connecticut was one of the first states in the nation to adopt an AI law, requiring companies to disclose when AI is being used in critical decisions like employment, housing, credit, or healthcare. That law is already drawing scrutiny from the technology industry. What xAI tried to do in California and now in Colorado is a preview of what we may face in Connecticut.

Keep ReadingShow less