Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Book review: 'Sustaining While Disrupting: The Challenge of Congregational Innovation'

book cover

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

This summer, I'm excited to explore a series of reviews highlighting the most impactful and thought-provoking books on my reading list. These works, ranging from spiritual guidance to social commentary, have the potential to enrich our minds, broaden our viewpoints, and inspire us to take action. First on the list is “ Sustaining While Disrupting: The Challenge of Congregational Innovation ” by F. Douglas Powe and Lovett H. Weems Jr.


This theologically grounded guide offers practical wisdom for faith practitioners striving to balance tradition and innovation, addressing the broader challenge of cultivating institutions that provide stability in chaotic times while propelling us toward a more just future. Whether you're a person of faith, a social entrepreneur, or a concerned citizen, the book's insights are not only inspiring but also deeply relevant to our current societal climate.

Powe and Weems, seasoned church leaders, contend that congregations must learn to sustain their core traditions and mission while also disrupting the status quo to remain vibrant and relevant. It requires a delicate balance between honoring one's heritage and embracing innovation, comforting the afflicted, and afflicting the comfortable.

The authors don't just theorize — they draw extensively from their own experiences, as well as those of other congregations, to illuminate the challenges and opportunities of sustaining while disrupting. They offer practical, actionable strategies for assessing a congregation's readiness for change, building consensus, and implementing innovations in areas like worship, leadership, and community engagement. These strategies are not just theoretical, but have been tested and proven effective in real-world situations.

What sets this book apart is its unique theological depth. Powe and Weems are not your typical management consultants with a faith veneer. They bring a distinct perspective, grounding their approach in a profound understanding of Christian scripture and tradition, particularly the prophetic call to justice and compassion. This theological depth is not just for faith communities, but for all who seek a deeper understanding of the world and their place in it.

This is what makes “Sustaining While Disrupting” not just a book for faith practitioners, but a crucial read for social entrepreneurs, citizen activists and all who care about the health of our democratic republic. In an era marked by deep divisions and rapid change, we urgently need institutions that can both ground us in a sense of history and purpose, and propel us toward a more just and equitable future. The time to act is now, and this book provides the guidance we need.

As we navigate the tensions between our "is-ness" and our "ought-ness," between the realities of our past and the promise of our potential, the church can be a unique source of wisdom and leadership. By sustaining our deepest values and traditions, we can find the courage and resilience to disrupt our society's injustices and inequalities. By embracing innovation and experimentation, we can help build a world more aligned with God's vision of love, justice and peace.

Of course, this journey is full of risks and challenges. Powe and Weems are candid about their obstacles, from resistance to change to the danger of burnout. They remind us that sustaining while disrupting is not a destination but a continuous process that requires discernment, creativity and perseverance.

Ultimately, "Sustaining While Disrupting" is a hopeful and challenging book, just like the church at its best. It invites us to embrace the tension between tradition and innovation, not as a source of paralysis but as a wellspring of renewal and transformation. It reminds us that the church, faithful to its deepest calling, can be a powerful force for good in the world — a source of comfort and disruption, a beacon of hope from our "is-ness" to our "ought-ness."

As someone who has dedicated their life to this work, I am deeply grateful for the wisdom and guidance that Powe and Weems offer. Their book is a gift for faith practitioners and all who care about the future of our congregations, our communities, and our shared democracy. It is a reminder that, even in the most challenging times, the church can sustain grace and disrupt love — a catalyst for the transformation of ourselves and the world around us.


Read More

Humanoid Educators Will Widen Inequality—And Only Tech Overlords Will Benefit
a sign with a question mark and a question mark drawn on it

Humanoid Educators Will Widen Inequality—And Only Tech Overlords Will Benefit

In March, First Lady Melania Trump hosted an AI-powered humanoid robot at the White House during the Fostering the Future Together Global Coalition Summit, and introduced Plato, a humanoid educator marketed as a replacement for teachers that could homeschool children. A humanoid educator that speaks multiple languages, is always available, and draws on a vast store of information could expand access in meaningful ways. But the evidence suggests that the risks outweigh the benefits, that adoption will be uneven, and that the families most likely to adopt Plato will bear those risks disproportionately.

Research on excessive technology use in childhood has found consistent results. Young children and teenagers who spend too much time with screens are more likely to experience reduced physical activity, lower attention spans, depression, and social anxiety. On the same day that Melania Trump introduced Plato, a California jury ruled that Meta and YouTube contributed to anxiety and depression in a woman who began using social media at age 6, a reminder that the consequences of under-tested technology on children can be severe and long-lasting.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a block with the words, "AI," on it, surrounded by slightly smaller caution signs.

The future of AI should be measured by its impact on ordinary Americans—not just tech executives and investors. Exploring AI inequality, labor concerns, and responsible innovation.

Getty Images, J Studios

The Kayla Test: Exploring How AI Impacts Everyday Americans

We’re failing the Kayla Test and running out of time to pass it. Whether AI goes “well” for the country is not a question anyone in SF or DC can answer. To assess whether AI is truly advancing the interests of Americans, AI stakeholders must engage with more than power users, tokenmaxxers, and Fortune 500 CEOs. A better evaluation is to talk to folks like Kayla, my Lyft driver in Morgantown, WV, and find out what they think about AI. It's a test I stumbled upon while traveling from an AI event at the West Virginia University College of Law to one at Stanford Law.

Kayla asked me what I do for a living. I told her that I’m a law professor focused on AI policy. Those were the last words I said for the remainder of the ride to the airport.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of a person on their phone at night.

From “Patriot Games” to The Hunger Games, how spectacle, social media, and political culture risk normalizing violence and eroding empathy.

Getty Images, Westend61

The Capitol Is Counting on Us to Laugh

When the Trump administration announced the Patriot Games, many people laughed. Selecting two children per state for a nationally televised sports competition looked too much like Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games to take seriously. But that instinct, to laugh rather than look closer, is one the Capitol is counting on. It has always been easier to normalize violence when it arrives dressed as entertainment or patriotism.

Here’s what I mean: The Hunger Games starts with the reaping, the moment when a Capitol official selects two children, one boy and one girl, to fight to the death against tributes from every other district. The games were created as an annual reminder of a failed rebellion, to remind the districts that dissent has consequences. At first, many Capitol residents saw the games as a just punishment. But sentiments shifted as the spectacle grew—when citizens could bet on winners, when a death march transformed into a beauty pageant, when murder became a pathway to celebrity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Technology and Presidential Election

Anthropic’s Mythos AI raises alarms about surveillance, deepfakes, and democracy. Why urgent AI regulation is needed as U.S. policy struggles to keep pace.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

How the Latest in AI Threatens Democracy

On April 24, America got a wake-up call from Anthropic, one of the nation’s leading artificial intelligence companies. It announced a new AI tool, called Mythos, that can identify flaws in computer networks and software systems that, as Politico puts it, “Even the brightest human minds have been unable to identify.”

A machine smarter than the “brightest human minds” sounds like a line from a dystopian science fiction movie. And if that weren’t scary enough, we now have a government populated by people who seem oblivious to the risks AI poses to democracy and humanity itself.

Keep ReadingShow less