Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Carlos Matallana: curiosity and joy

We are proud to present “3 Questions With,” a public affairs series elevating the voices and visibility of matters most important to the Hispanic-Latino community by speaking with community and industry thought leaders on the social determinants of health and democracy. “3 Questions With” is co-produced by the Latino News Network and CAN- TV, Chicago’s hub for community-centric news, hyperlocal stories and educational resources.

After-school programs offer mentoring and positive role models for youth. In addition to academic support, provide a wide range of enrichment activities that promote the holistic development of youth. From sports and the arts to music and drama, these programs allow young people to explore their interests and talents outside the traditional classroom setting.

Exposure to different activities can broaden their perspectives, improve their social skill, and foster a sense of belonging within a community.

Carlos Matallana, the founder and developer of the Blok by Blok Podcast Club, a youth-led organization in Chicago, was a guest on “3 Questions With…” hosted by Hugo Balta, publisher of IL Latino News.


Programs like Blok by Blok play a crucial role in providing youth with a safe and supportive environment to express their views about the world — perspectives often discounted by adults. “We are teaching them and giving them the tools to develop their own stories,” said Matallana.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Among the topics the programs tackle are crime and public safety. “We are in our seventh season, and it’s been there constantly, how they fear about their safety,” explained Matallana about a common theme of the podcasts. “Just walking from home to school and getting back safe is a first concern.”

Matallana was a cohort in the Latino Policy Forum-sponsored Multicultural Leadership Academy. “Black and Brown communities, we face similar challenges and values. I was able to identify three [values],” he remembered. “Family, food and flow. I think those three elements are key for us individuals who want to create and promote change.”

Every year, the MLA program brings together Black and Latino community leaders who together work to build cross-cultural understanding and cooperation.

A native of Colombia, Matallana said his mother encouraged his interest and other passion (besides education): art. Matallana, an illustrator, says, “Comics conveys my working experience, passion for inking and research in complex issues such as violence, urbanism, financial, housing and art which motivates me to question my position as a father, educator, and artist, then challenge the audience to reflect about their role in a complex-rich urban society as Chicago.”

Enjoy this insightful interview.

3 Questions With...Carlos Matallanawww.youtube.com

This story was first published on IL Latino News as “Carlos Matallana: Curiosity & Joy.” The Fulcrum and Latino News Network are partners in providing stories that are fair and accurate, representative and inclusive of diverse communities.

Read More

An illustration of diverse people around a heart with the design of the American flag.
An illustration of diverse people around a heart with the design of the American flag.
Getty Images, wildpixel

The Next Hundred Days: America's Latest Test of Democracy

For decades, we have watched America wrestle with its demons. Sometimes, she has successfully pinned them down. Other times, the demons have slipped beyond her grasp. Yet, America has always remained in the ring. There is no difference right now, and the stakes couldn't be higher.

Across America, from small-town council meetings to state legislatures, there's a coordinated effort to roll back the clock on civil rights, geopolitical relations, and the global economy. It's not subtle, and it's not accidental. The targeting of immigrants and citizens of color has become so normalized that we risk becoming numb to it. For example, what happened in Springfield, Ohio, late last year? When national politicians started pushing rhetoric against Haitian immigrants, it wasn't just local politics at play. It was a test balloon, a preview of talking points soon echoed in halls of government and media outlets nationwide. Thus, this is how discrimination, intolerance, and blatant hate go mainstream or viral—it starts small, tests the waters, and spreads like a virus through our body politic and social system.

Keep ReadingShow less
Future of the National Museum of the American Latino is Uncertain

PRESENTE! A Latino History of the United States

Credit: National Museum of the American Latino

Future of the National Museum of the American Latino is Uncertain

The American Museum of the Latino faces more hurdles after over two decades of advocacy.

Congress passed legislation to allow for the creation of the Museum, along with the American Women’s History Museum, as part of the Smithsonian Institution in an online format. Five years later, new legislation introduced by Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) wants to build a physical museum for both the Latino and women’s museums but might face pushback due to a new executive order signed by President Donald Trump.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fairness, Not Stigma, for Transgender Athletes

People running.

Getty Images, Pavel1964

Fairness, Not Stigma, for Transgender Athletes

President Trump’s campaign and allies spent $21 million of campaign spending on attack ads against transgender people. With that level of spending, I was shocked to find out it was not a top concern for voters of either party, but it continued to prevail as a campaign priority.

Opponents of transgender participation in sports continue to voice their opinions, three months into the Trump presidency. Just last month, the Trump administration suspended $175 million in federal funding to Penn State over a transgender swimmer. $175 million is a bit dramatic over one swimmer, or in the case of the entire NCAA, fewer than 10 athletes. Even Governor Gavin Newsom was recently under fire for sharing his views on his podcast. Others, like Rep. Nancy Mace, have also caught on to the mediagenic nature of transphobia right now. “You want penises in women's bathrooms, and I'm not going to have it,” she said in a U.S. House hearing last month. I had no clue who Nancy Mace was prior to her notorious views on LGBTQ+ rights. Frankly, her flip from being a supporter of LGBTQ+ rights to shouting “Tr**ny” in a hearing seems less like a change of opinion and more of a cry for attention.

Keep ReadingShow less
Unit Cohesion is a Pretext for Exclusion

The transgender flag on a military uniform.

Getty Images, Cunaplus_M.Faba

Unit Cohesion is a Pretext for Exclusion

In the annals of military history, the desire for uniformity has often been wielded as a sword against inclusion. This tendency resurfaced dramatically when President Donald Trump, shortly after taking office, signed an executive order, purportedly rooted in concerns about unit cohesion, that banned transgender individuals from serving in the armed forces. It was challenged and blocked by a federal judge on March 18, who described the ban as “soaked in animus and dripping with pretext.” On March 27, a second judge issued an injunction on the ban, calling it “unsupported, dramatic and facially unfair exclusionary policy” (the Trump administration asked the 9th Circuit to stay the ruling; they were denied on April 1). It turns out that the argument that introducing any minority into military ranks would disrupt unit cohesion is practically a cliché, with similar claims having been made against integrating black men, women, and then openly gay service members. It is a tale as old as time. But that’s just it–it’s just a tale. Don’t believe it.

The military top brass have, at times, insisted that the integration of minority groups would undermine the effectiveness of our armed forces, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Air Force General Henry Arnold wrote in 1941 that “the use of women pilots serves no military purpose,” only to have “nothing but praise” for them by 1944, after having served with them. Regarding integrating women into combat roles in 1993, Congress members argued that “although logical, such a policy would [erode] the civilizing notion that men should protect…women.” Of course, they also offered the even more convenient cover story that integration would be “disruptive to unit cohesion.” Similarly, although many claimed that “letting gays serve openly would ruin [unit cohesion],” the resistance was found to be “based on nothing” except “our own prejudices and . . . fears.” Dozens of studies conducted by the U.S. military and 25 other nations confirmed the presence of gay soldiers had no impact on unit cohesion. These results were ignored in “the service of an ideology equating heterosexuality with bravery and patriotism.” Unit cohesion is a simple—though thinly veiled—rationale.

Keep ReadingShow less