Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just 5 states requiring a non-Covid reason to vote by mail after S.C. leaves the list

absentee voting

South Carolina is the 11th state allowing everyone to vote by mail in November because of the pandemic.

Cindy Ord/Getty Images

South Carolina is poised to become the latest state to permit all voters to use an absentee ballot this fall because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Republican Gov. Henry McMaster's office says he will sign a measure, cleared during a special session of the General Assembly on Tuesday, that will suspend for the November election the state's normally strict excuse requirements for mail-in voting.

That leaves just five states still demanding a reason beyond fear of Covid-19 exposure for voting away from a polling place this fall: Texas, which has developed into the biggest presidential battleground, along with reliably Republican Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee.


South Carolina is joining 10 other states in going to a no-excuse system this year only because of the public health emergency. Its usual restrictions have led to about 5 percent of all votes being cast by mail in recent elections — a number that might now soar almost tenfold.

Tuesday's 115-1 vote in the state House followed a unanimous vote last week in the Senate, but that masked partisan divides over other proposed election easements for South Carolina's 3.4 million voters.

Citing concerns about potential fraud, the solid GOP majority repelled Democratic efforts to add two amendments to the bill. One would have ended the requirement for a witness signature on mailed ballot envelopes, sometimes tough to obtain at a time of social distancing. The other would have required the installation of ballot drop boxes across the state.

A federal judge suspended the witness requirement for the state's June primary, so it's possible the courts may weigh in again before November.

The new legislation extends the deadline for seeking an absentee ballot to four days before Election Day, so long as the application is made in person. But completed ballots will only get counted if received by election officials before polls close Nov. 3.

In a boon to local clerks hoping to provide relatively speedy returns, the bill allows them to check the signatures on envelopes and prepare the ballots for tabulating starting Nov. 1 — not on Election Day, as in the past.

President Trump looks highly likely to secure the state's nine electoral votes, which a Democrat last carried when Jimmy Carter won the White House 44 years ago. But enhanced turnout could boost the Democrats' chances of holding on to a House seat centered on Charleston and propelling their well-funded former state party chairman, Jaime Harrison, who is waging a vigorous if uphill challenge to Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham.


Read More

Members of a women's softball team cheerfully join hands during practice on a sunny day, showcasing team spirit, cooperation, and enthusiasm for the sport.

Do trans women have a strength advantage? A look at studies on hormone therapy, muscle mass, and why it should determine eligibility in women's sports.

luza studios/Getty Images

Trans Females Are Not Biological Males - Let Them Play on Female Teams

Most Americans, Democrats as well as Republicans—many following the lead of President Trump—feel that it is not right for trans females to participate in women's sports. But the trans community, supported by those on the left wing of the Democratic Party, insists that this is part of ensuring the rights of trans people. The issue has been divisive among Democrats.

This is a complex issue. On the one hand, boys are boys, and girls are girls. That's the basic fact behind male and female sports, other than some intramural school sports that have boys and girls on the same team. Because boys are biologically stronger and faster than girls, separate leagues have been developed for both. This has nothing to do with gender identity; it is just a reflection of biological fact.

Keep ReadingShow less
An aerial view of a Flock camera

An aerial view of a Flock camera in Burbank, California. U.S. President Donald Trump expressed support for Flock cameras, saying he likes the AI-powered surveillance technology because of its use by law enforcement, despite concerns that it infringes on privacy.

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Flock Cameras Are Coming Down – but We Need More To Dismantle the Surveillance State

Chances are, you’ve seen one in your neighborhood. Flock cameras have become a major flashpoint for voters in the leadup to the midterms. The concept sounds straight out of 1984 — a network of government-owned cameras that track your movements — it’s no wonder that Americans across party lines are demanding their states and towns sever ties with the controversial company. Surveillance fears are only getting stronger as we enter the AI era.

But the problem isn’t just Flock. These cameras, Automated License Plate Readers or ALPRs to be exact, are a symptom of a larger “surveil first, ask questions later” attitude that has been adopted by local and federal government for decades. In recent years, the federal government has been dramatically expanding the nation’s surveillance infrastructure. This has taken many forms, from facial recognition technology at the airport, to law enforcement monitoring your mail, to the government watching what you’re posting on your personal social media pages. Since April, many Democrats and Republicans in Congress have united to stop what would effectively be a blank check for surveillance via FISA reauthorization, demanding surveillance reforms such as closing the “data broker loophole”, which allows the government to buy Americans’ personal data without a warrant.

Keep ReadingShow less