Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The shifting Labor Day landscape: Making meaning in the 21st century

The shifting Labor Day landscape: Making meaning in the 21st century

The Empire State Building lit in red, white, and blue to mark Labor Day weekend in New York City.

Getty Images

Audi Hecht is the Director of Education and Innovation at Civic Spirit.

Labor Day provides one final chance to savor the expansive joys of summer. Established as a day to celebrate the contributions of American workers and trade unionists, it became a federal holiday in 1894 after securing homage in many states across the nation. When contemplating Labor Day's modern significance through a 21st-century lens, a multitude of avenues for exploration becomes apparent.


First and foremost, it's essential to understand the evolving landscape of work in America. The origins of Labor Day coincide with the introduction of the Omaha Platform in 1892. This platform proposed a comprehensive set of political and economic reforms in response to the extensive challenges emanating from rapid industrialization and urbanization, including injustices in labor practices and political corruption. The ideas put forth by the Populists during this time found fuller expression in the Progressive era, setting the stage for increased governmental oversight of industries and a profound shift in the national perspective regarding government intervention. This shift aimed to ensure that working conditions were no longer solely subject to the arbitrary choices of individual enterprises. Instead, it established benchmarks for fundamental working conditions, such as protective legislation for women, a ban on child labor, the creation of the Federal Department of Labor, and laws setting work hours and conditions. As a result, while some might envy the plush work environment and benefits provided to Google employees, the inhumane working conditions that workers around the world sadly endure are no longer acceptable within the United States.

The trajectory of work has been reimagined over the next century, creating transformative effects such as the development of the Rust Belt in areas of the Midwest and Northeast. The regional decay of once vibrant industrial hubs in the United States and the outsourcing of many work sectors led to the decline of these factory towns and gave rise to a substantial portion of the U.S. electorate who felt left out and left behind. Within these communities, there's a strong desire for acknowledgment of their challenges and proposals to rejuvenate their ailing townships and bolster morale. Nostalgia for an era when "Made in the USA" held more prominence than it does in today's globalized work environment serves to accentuate the contrasts and emerging realities.

Welcomed or not, the global pandemic reimagined the workspace in monumental ways, redefining where and how we work. The shuttering factory of yesteryear gave way not only to replacing the company cubicle with home work spaces but to the ways we think about being present at work and engaging with colleagues. Furthermore, it has catalyzed the emergence of a novel category of working professionals, a concept first introduced by author and sociologist Rosalind Williams. In her work "Retooling: A Historian Confronts Technological Change," Williams highlights the ascent of what she terms the "laptop class.” This category enjoys enhanced mobility and autonomy, granting them increased control over various aspects of work, work-life balance boundaries, and work culture. A study conducted by Pew Research in March 2023 found that 35% of U.S. workers are now working from home consistently, with 71% affirming that it has positively influenced their work-life balance. In contrast, 61% of U.S. workers lack the option to work remotely. This discrepancy highlights a societal divide concerning access to specific working arrangements and expands the conversation and implications on opportunities and access afforded to American workers.

As the Director of Education and Innovation for Civic Spirit, a non-partisan civics organization working with schools across faith traditions, teaching about the role of work in our nation’s history raises many topics for study, such as the progression of workers' rights, including efforts to secure equal pay for women amidst evidence of gross disparities, the impact of technological advancement, and the changing political realities in a converging business world to name a few. Cultural shifts and rifts often give rise to new challenges and promise. How do they bring new life to foundational freedoms, and do these changing realities propel a nation to think about securing them for all?

As we wave goodbye to the freshness of the summer aura this Labor Day, let us refresh our thought paradigms about work, its meaning, and the opportunities for progress they welcome.


Read More

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

US Capitol and South America. Nicolas Maduro’s capture is not the end of an era. It marks the opening act of a turbulent transition

AI generated

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

The U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro will be remembered as one of the most dramatic American interventions in Latin America in a generation. But the real story isn’t the raid itself. It’s what the raid reveals about the political imagination of the hemisphere—how quickly governments abandon the language of sovereignty when it becomes inconvenient, and how easily Washington slips back into the posture of regional enforcer.

The operation was months in the making, driven by a mix of narcotrafficking allegations, geopolitical anxiety, and the belief that Maduro’s security perimeter had finally cracked. The Justice Department’s $50 million bounty—an extraordinary price tag for a sitting head of state—signaled that the U.S. no longer viewed Maduro as a political problem to be negotiated with, but as a criminal target to be hunted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red elephants and blue donkeys

The ACA subsidy deadline reveals how Republican paralysis and loyalty-driven leadership are hollowing out Congress’s ability to govern.

Carol Yepes

Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis

Picture a bridge with a clearly posted warning: without a routine maintenance fix, it will close. Engineers agree on the repair, but the construction crew in charge refuses to act. The problem is not that the fix is controversial or complex, but that making the repair might be seen as endorsing the bridge itself.

So, traffic keeps moving, the deadline approaches, and those responsible promise to revisit the issue “next year,” even as the risk of failure grows. The danger is that the bridge fails anyway, leaving everyone who depends on it to bear the cost of inaction.

Keep ReadingShow less
White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money and the American flag
Half of Americans want participatory budgeting at the local level. What's standing in the way?
SimpleImages/Getty Images

For the People, By the People — Or By the Wealthy?

When did America replace “for the people, by the people” with “for the wealthy, by the wealthy”? Wealthy donors are increasingly shaping our policies, institutions, and even the balance of power, while the American people are left as spectators, watching democracy erode before their eyes. The question is not why billionaires need wealth — they already have it. The question is why they insist on owning and controlling government — and the people.

Back in 1968, my Government teacher never spoke of powerful think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, now funded by billionaires determined to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Yet here in 2025, these forces openly work to control the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court through Project 2025. The corruption is visible everywhere. Quid pro quo and pay for play are not abstractions — they are evident in the gifts showered on Supreme Court justices.

Keep ReadingShow less