Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

There is no magic pill for postpartum depression

There is no magic pill for postpartum depression
Getty Images

Priya Iyer is the founder of Our Roots, a non-profit that virtually connects BIPOC, low-income pregnant and postpartum communities to peer support coaches to prevent perinatal anxiety and depression. She holds an MPH in Epidemiology from Columbia University, and she is a Public Voices Fellow with the OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

The FDA recently approved the first oral drug for postpartum depression, Zurzuvae. At first glance, this seems like especially good news for women and birthing people of color, who are twice as likely to experience perinatal mood disorders as compared to White women (further compounded if they are low-income). However, supporting people with perinatal depression is much more complex than popping a pill. A drug cannot replace or mask the systemic issues faced by those who need support the most.


We should stop overhyping Zurzuvae’s potential impact, when it may be inaccessible to those it is supposed to benefit. Like many other patented drugs, the cost will be potentially prohibitive. Additionally, BIPOC communities are often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed for postpartum depression by the same clinicians whom we are relying on to prescribe the pill. This is due to a range of reasons from limited provider training on culturally-responsive care to implicit biases. An abundance of evidence shows us potential pathways to addressing disparities in health.

Yet, the U.S. healthcare system promotes profit for pharmaceutical companies over investment in proven solutions, which comes at a cost. For each mother-baby pair affected by and untreated for a perinatal mood disorder, the financial toll for society is $31,800. Sage Therapeutic (the maker of Zurzuvae) has said the price for the drug will be around $10,000. With their estimate that 400,000 people are impacted by postpartum depression, the cost of treating these birthing people each year is $4,000,000,000 to payers, which includes a projected, handsome $1.35 billion revenue stream for Sage by 2032.

At half the amount, we could offer preventative solutions to all four million people giving birth each year, including some tailored to BIPOC and low-income communities. As the founder of Our Roots, a social enterprise that connects BIPOC, low-income birthing people to peer support coaches who share lived experiences, we are able to prevent depression and anxiety at the cost of $500 per mother baby pair, and likely much less on a larger scale. These preventative and systemic fixes are far more likely to benefit those who need access the most as well as the general population.

I’ve worked as a part of an access solution program at a pharmaceutical company and have seen when underinsured or uninsured people are desperately in need of medication because preventative solutions have failed them. Pharmaceutical companies claim they will make Zurzuvae available through such access programs. However, in my experience, access programs serve primarily as marketing and branding opportunities for pharmaceutical companies. They serve as a patchwork solution without addressing the root problem of prohibitively and unnecessarily high drug costs ( 3.44 times the amount of brand-named drugs in comparable nations).

As both a BIPOC mother of two—who experienced a perinatal mood disorder—and a maternal and child health epidemiologist, I know that a combination of culturally-responsive doctors, therapists, and extensive group and individual peer and community support has been proven to both prevent and treat perinatal mood disorders. There is no magic pill that can dismantle the systems of oppression that exist in our healthcare systems and instead build systems truly tailored to the diverse fabric of our society. While systemic injustice continues to exist, we should ask ourselves who Zurzuvae will truly benefit.

Read More

news app
New platforms help overcome biased news reporting
Tero Vesalainen/Getty Images

The Selective Sanctity of Death: When Empathy Depends on Skin Color

Rampant calls to avoid sharing the video of Charlie Kirk’s death have been swift and emphatic across social media. “We need to keep our souls clean,” journalists plead. “Where are social media’s content moderators?” “How did we get so desensitized?” The moral outrage is palpable; the demands for human dignity urgent and clear.

But as a Black woman who has been forced to witness the constant virality of Black death, I must ask: where was this widespread anger for George Floyd? For Philando Castile? For Daunte Wright? For Tyre Nichols?

Keep ReadingShow less
Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less