Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

There is no magic pill for postpartum depression

There is no magic pill for postpartum depression
Getty Images

Priya Iyer is the founder of Our Roots, a non-profit that virtually connects BIPOC, low-income pregnant and postpartum communities to peer support coaches to prevent perinatal anxiety and depression. She holds an MPH in Epidemiology from Columbia University, and she is a Public Voices Fellow with the OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

The FDA recently approved the first oral drug for postpartum depression, Zurzuvae. At first glance, this seems like especially good news for women and birthing people of color, who are twice as likely to experience perinatal mood disorders as compared to White women (further compounded if they are low-income). However, supporting people with perinatal depression is much more complex than popping a pill. A drug cannot replace or mask the systemic issues faced by those who need support the most.


We should stop overhyping Zurzuvae’s potential impact, when it may be inaccessible to those it is supposed to benefit. Like many other patented drugs, the cost will be potentially prohibitive. Additionally, BIPOC communities are often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed for postpartum depression by the same clinicians whom we are relying on to prescribe the pill. This is due to a range of reasons from limited provider training on culturally-responsive care to implicit biases. An abundance of evidence shows us potential pathways to addressing disparities in health.

Yet, the U.S. healthcare system promotes profit for pharmaceutical companies over investment in proven solutions, which comes at a cost. For each mother-baby pair affected by and untreated for a perinatal mood disorder, the financial toll for society is $31,800. Sage Therapeutic (the maker of Zurzuvae) has said the price for the drug will be around $10,000. With their estimate that 400,000 people are impacted by postpartum depression, the cost of treating these birthing people each year is $4,000,000,000 to payers, which includes a projected, handsome $1.35 billion revenue stream for Sage by 2032.

At half the amount, we could offer preventative solutions to all four million people giving birth each year, including some tailored to BIPOC and low-income communities. As the founder of Our Roots, a social enterprise that connects BIPOC, low-income birthing people to peer support coaches who share lived experiences, we are able to prevent depression and anxiety at the cost of $500 per mother baby pair, and likely much less on a larger scale. These preventative and systemic fixes are far more likely to benefit those who need access the most as well as the general population.

I’ve worked as a part of an access solution program at a pharmaceutical company and have seen when underinsured or uninsured people are desperately in need of medication because preventative solutions have failed them. Pharmaceutical companies claim they will make Zurzuvae available through such access programs. However, in my experience, access programs serve primarily as marketing and branding opportunities for pharmaceutical companies. They serve as a patchwork solution without addressing the root problem of prohibitively and unnecessarily high drug costs ( 3.44 times the amount of brand-named drugs in comparable nations).

As both a BIPOC mother of two—who experienced a perinatal mood disorder—and a maternal and child health epidemiologist, I know that a combination of culturally-responsive doctors, therapists, and extensive group and individual peer and community support has been proven to both prevent and treat perinatal mood disorders. There is no magic pill that can dismantle the systems of oppression that exist in our healthcare systems and instead build systems truly tailored to the diverse fabric of our society. While systemic injustice continues to exist, we should ask ourselves who Zurzuvae will truly benefit.


Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less