Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

There is no magic pill for postpartum depression

There is no magic pill for postpartum depression
Getty Images

Priya Iyer is the founder of Our Roots, a non-profit that virtually connects BIPOC, low-income pregnant and postpartum communities to peer support coaches to prevent perinatal anxiety and depression. She holds an MPH in Epidemiology from Columbia University, and she is a Public Voices Fellow with the OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

The FDA recently approved the first oral drug for postpartum depression, Zurzuvae. At first glance, this seems like especially good news for women and birthing people of color, who are twice as likely to experience perinatal mood disorders as compared to White women (further compounded if they are low-income). However, supporting people with perinatal depression is much more complex than popping a pill. A drug cannot replace or mask the systemic issues faced by those who need support the most.


We should stop overhyping Zurzuvae’s potential impact, when it may be inaccessible to those it is supposed to benefit. Like many other patented drugs, the cost will be potentially prohibitive. Additionally, BIPOC communities are often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed for postpartum depression by the same clinicians whom we are relying on to prescribe the pill. This is due to a range of reasons from limited provider training on culturally-responsive care to implicit biases. An abundance of evidence shows us potential pathways to addressing disparities in health.

Yet, the U.S. healthcare system promotes profit for pharmaceutical companies over investment in proven solutions, which comes at a cost. For each mother-baby pair affected by and untreated for a perinatal mood disorder, the financial toll for society is $31,800. Sage Therapeutic (the maker of Zurzuvae) has said the price for the drug will be around $10,000. With their estimate that 400,000 people are impacted by postpartum depression, the cost of treating these birthing people each year is $4,000,000,000 to payers, which includes a projected, handsome $1.35 billion revenue stream for Sage by 2032.

At half the amount, we could offer preventative solutions to all four million people giving birth each year, including some tailored to BIPOC and low-income communities. As the founder of Our Roots, a social enterprise that connects BIPOC, low-income birthing people to peer support coaches who share lived experiences, we are able to prevent depression and anxiety at the cost of $500 per mother baby pair, and likely much less on a larger scale. These preventative and systemic fixes are far more likely to benefit those who need access the most as well as the general population.

I’ve worked as a part of an access solution program at a pharmaceutical company and have seen when underinsured or uninsured people are desperately in need of medication because preventative solutions have failed them. Pharmaceutical companies claim they will make Zurzuvae available through such access programs. However, in my experience, access programs serve primarily as marketing and branding opportunities for pharmaceutical companies. They serve as a patchwork solution without addressing the root problem of prohibitively and unnecessarily high drug costs ( 3.44 times the amount of brand-named drugs in comparable nations).

As both a BIPOC mother of two—who experienced a perinatal mood disorder—and a maternal and child health epidemiologist, I know that a combination of culturally-responsive doctors, therapists, and extensive group and individual peer and community support has been proven to both prevent and treat perinatal mood disorders. There is no magic pill that can dismantle the systems of oppression that exist in our healthcare systems and instead build systems truly tailored to the diverse fabric of our society. While systemic injustice continues to exist, we should ask ourselves who Zurzuvae will truly benefit.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism
Monopoly's mr. monopoly in a graffiti collage
Photo by Artur Ament on Unsplash

Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism

The signs are everywhere. For many Americans, buying power has improved only modestly despite decades of economic growth. Corporate profits are at an all-time high. We have reached a level of wealth inequality last seen almost a hundred years ago. By many measures, our capitalist economy seems to have failed to deliver broadly shared prosperity.

However, the failure isn’t with the free market as an economic approach. Instead, it’s our failure to regulate and moderate the free market, or more accurately, that we have spent 40 years undermining or removing the regulations of the New Deal that made our economy work for more Americans.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman putting savings in a white piggy bank.

America’s economy now rewards asset ownership over wages. A policy proposal: a $35,000 Birthright Account for every child, and how it could be funded.

Guido Mieth/Getty Images

The American Dream Needs a New Economic Operating System

It is, by now, not an exaggeration to state that the traditional American Dream—work hard, buy a house, raise a family, and retire securely—is failing. It was built for a labor-based economy in which steadily rising wages allowed ordinary families to accumulate wealth. But America has become an asset-based economy, and ownership of those assets is extraordinarily concentrated.

Since the 1980s, the returns from capital have far outpaced the returns from labor. Inflation-adjusted wages for ordinary workers have risen only modestly, while the real value of equities has multiplied many times over. Housing, education, healthcare and childcare costs have soared, employment has become less secure, and defined-benefit pensions have largely disappeared. Even two-income households with respectable jobs often struggle to buy a home, build savings and accumulate enough for retirement.

Keep ReadingShow less