Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ukrainian artists defend homeland

Ukrainian artists defend homeland

Image of artwork that reads, "What should I plan for in case of war?"

For Ukrainian artists, art is a powerful tool of resistance in the face of Russian aggression.

More than 9.1 million refugees have left the country since Vladimir Putin initiated the invasion of Ukraine, while around 8 million people remain displaced internally. One-quarter of the country's total population have abandoned their homes.


In these tragic times, many Ukrainian artists have used their skills to help raise awareness of the devastation. Photographer Vladyslav Krasnoshchok is one such artist.

In Kharkiv and with his camera, Krasnoshchok has captured ruined buildings, mounds of weapons, and refugees camping in the subway station, which he has posted on his Instagram.

Krasnoshchok is far from alone in his endeavors. Anna Sarvira is a graphic artist who was based in Kyiv before she fled Ukraine and does not know when she will be able to return.

Sarvira has created works centered around daily life in Ukraine. These images, available on the Museum of Modern Art website, show the haunting questions Ukrainians ask themselves as they try to survive. In one picture, a woman is preparing a meal with eggs, and the caption shows her wondering, "will I be fast enough to reach the bomb shelter?" Another shows a woman carrying a large backpack with the text "will I have to run?"

Some artists hope that they can defend their country through their art.

Singer Lyana Mytsko is the director of the Lviv Municipal Arts Center; when the war began Mytsko made the center into a shelter for war evacuees in addition as a place to create art. Mytsko views art as a vital way to defend the country.

While Putin argues that Ukraine is not a real country and does not have a culture of its own, Mysko believes it is up to Ukrainian artists to prove him wrong.

In a recent NPR article, Mytsko argued that while many artists feel that they cannot take a gun into their hands, "they must know that every one of them is a gun of Ukrainian culture. Every one of them can make music and make pictures and can take our soul up, up, up."

Some Ukrainians are using their skills to defend Ukraine in a more literal sense. One example is Ukrainian artists such as Volo Bevza and Victoria Pidust who joined the defense groups in Lviv by making tank traps.

The spiky anti-tank structures, commonly known as "Czech hedgehogs," are made by welding metal I-beams and chains. These structures can puncture tires or flip vehicles that attempt to drive over them.

Together with the help of Victoria's brother Mark Pidust, the artists have been able to create about 100 anti-tank structures to help protect cities across Ukraine.

As Ukraine’s artists continue to fight for their country's freedom, organizations such as Artmajeur have worked to help them sell their work online. Artmajeur is a PR distribution network that has worked to clear obstacles to make sure Ukrainian artists can keep working and continue to sell their work.

Artmajeur has found artists, carriers willing to pick up art in war zones, and a payment processor that would pay artists in Ukraine as many banks have stopped doing business there.

Artmajeur now has a collection of more than 3,000 Ukrainian artists whose work you can browse, collect and buy safely. The benefits from these sales go directly to the Ukrainian artists.

Like artists in previous war zones, Ukrainian artists have joined the fight, using their expression to demonstrate and help the world feel the horrors of war that are easy to dismiss.

As the war in Ukraine continues to rage on, it is up to us to support the citizens fighting to protect their homeland. Supporting these artists and the work is one such way to do that.


Read More

Who’s Responsible When AI Causes Harm?: Unpacking the Federal AI Liability Framework Debate
the letters are made up of different colors

Who’s Responsible When AI Causes Harm?: Unpacking the Federal AI Liability Framework Debate

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key takeaways

  • The U.S. has no national AI liability law. Instead, a patchwork of state laws has emerged which has resulted in legal protections being dependent on where an individual resides.
  • It’s often unclear who is legally responsible when AI causes harm. This gap leaves many people with no clear path to seek help.
  • In March 2026, the White House and Congress introduced major proposals to establish a federal standard, but there is significant disagreement about whether that standard should prioritize protecting innovation or protecting people harmed by AI systems.

Background: A Patchwork of State Laws

Without a national AI law, states have been filling in the gaps on their own. The result is an uneven landscape where a person’s legal protections depend entirely on which state they live in.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stethoscope, pile of hundred dollar bills and a calculator

A deep dive into America’s healthcare cost crisis, comparing reform to a modern “moonshot.” Explores payment models, rising costs, and lessons from John F. Kennedy’s space race vision to drive systemic change.

IronHeart/Getty Images

The Moonshot America Needs to Solve Its Healthcare Crisis

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy told the nation, “We choose to go to the moon.” It’s often remembered as a moment of national ambition. In reality, the United States was locked in a Cold War with the Soviet Union, and the fear of falling behind in technological dominance made the mission unavoidable.

Today’s space race is driven by a different force. Governments and private companies are investing billions to capture economic advantages, from satellite infrastructure to advanced computing to the next frontier of resource extraction.

Keep ReadingShow less
After the Court's Voting Rights Decision - How to Protect Black-Majority Districts
a large white building with columns with United States Supreme Court Building in the background

After the Court's Voting Rights Decision - How to Protect Black-Majority Districts

The Supreme Court recently ruled that Louisiana violated the Constitution in creating a new Black-majority voting district. This was after a Federal court had ruled that the previous map, by packing Blacks all in one district, diluted their votes, which violated the Voting Rights Act.

The question is what impact the decision in Louisiana v Callais will have on §2 of the Voting Rights Act ... and on the current gerrymander contest to gain safe seats in the House. The conservative majority said that the decision left the Act intact. The liberal minority, in a strong dissent by Justice Kagan, said that the practical impact was to "render §2 all but a dead letter," making it likely that existing Black-majority districts will not remain for long.

Keep ReadingShow less