Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In swing states, D’s and R’s agree U.S. should continue aid to Ukraine

Survey also found strong bipartisan support for maintaining U.S. membership in NATO

Flag of Ukraine alongside flag of United States

Flags of Ukraine and the United States

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Amid debates about U.S. international engagement, a new public consultation survey conducted in six swing states by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation found widespread bipartisan support for the United States continuing to provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

Majorities of both Republicans and Democrats support the U.S. upholding the principle of collective security by helping to protect nations that are under attack; continuing to be a member of NATO; and continuing to abide by the longstanding international ban on nuclear testing.


This survey is the fourth in the “Swing Six Issue Surveys”seriesbeing conducted in the run-up to the November election in swing states, and nationally, on major policy issues. Unlike traditional polls, respondents in a public consultation survey go through an online “policymaking simulation” in which they are provided briefings and arguments for and against each policy. Content is reviewed by experts on different sides to ensure accuracy and balance.

“Surveys have consistently shown that, while Americans don’t want the US to be the world policeman, they do want the U.S. to work with other countries to uphold the international order and help protect nations from aggressors,” said Steven Kull, director of the Program for Public Consultation.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The survey was fielded July 19-Aug. 2, and involved 4,628 adults, including approximately 600 in each state of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and 1,211 nationally.

Continuing aid to Ukraine

Large majorities in every swing state (64 percent to 71 percent), including majorities of Democrats (73 percent to 85 percent), favor the United States continuing to provide military aid to Ukraine — including weapons, ammunition, training and intelligence

A majority of Republicans in Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (56 percent to 60 percent) are in favor, while in Michigan and Nevada they are evenly divided. However, majorities of Republicans in Michigan (57 percent) and Nevada (60 percent) find it at least “tolerable.” Nationally, 67 percent are in favor, including majorities of Republicans (57 percent) and Democrats (79 percent).

Before coming to their conclusion, respondents were informed that the United States has already provided Ukraine with tens of billions of dollars worth of military aid and that European countries have provided an equivalent amount. Two arguments against providing aid — that European nations are responsible for taking care of this war, and that, by engaging, the United States risks escalation to nuclear war — were found convincing by about six in 10. But the two arguments in favor — that U.S. engagement is necessary to prevent Russia from further aggression, and to uphold the international order based on national sovereignty — were both found convincing by larger majorities of around eight in 10.

The U.S. continuing to provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine — including food, shelter and assistance to repair infrastructure — is favored by large bipartisan majorities in every swing state (71 percent to 75 percent), including 60 percent to 69 percent of Republicans and 76 percent to 88 percent of Democrats. Nationally, 74 percent are in favor (Republicans 65 percent, Democrats 84 percent).

Bar graph showing results of question about continued humanitarian assistance for Ukrainepublicconsultation.org

Upholding collective security

Bipartisan majorities say it should be a high priority for the United States to uphold the principle of collective security, which says that when a country comes under attack, other countries should join together to help defend it, through military force and/or economic sanctions.

Support ranges from 75 percent to 81 percent in the swing states, including 70 percent to 77 percent of Republicans and 81 percent to 89 percent Democrats, as well as 80 percent nationally.

Bar graph showing results of question about upholding the principle of collective securitypublicconsultation.org

Maintaining U.S. membership in NATO

Respondents were given a briefing on the Western military alliance NATO and how it includes “a key section, called Article 5, which says that NATO members regard an attack on any member as an attack on all and that all members will defend any member that is attacked.” The United States continuing to be part of NATO is favored by bipartisan majorities of 76 percent to 81 percent in the swing states, including 72 percent to 77 percent of Republicans and 83 percent to 89 percent of Democrats, as well as 78 percent nationally.

Continuing a moratorium on nuclear testing

Recently, the debate over nuclear weapons testing has been reignited by calls for the U.S. military to restart testing. The United States, Russia, China, France and the United Kingdom have all had moratoriums on testing for three decades, as part of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty.

Bipartisan majorities of 73 percent to 78 percent in the swing states said the United States should continue its moratorium on nuclear testing. Support includes 68 percent to 75 percent of Republicans and 75 percent to 83 percent of Democrats in the swing states, as well as 75 percent nationally.

Bar graph showing results of question about continuing a moratorium on nuclear testingpublicconsultation.org


Read More

Red and blue fingers pointing at each other
PM Images/Getty Images

Maybe America needs a mom to call a time out

Klug served in the House of Representatives from 1991 to 1999. He hosts the political podcast “Lost in the Middle: America’s Political Orphans.”

All of us have had that moment. An innocent comment over coffee with a friend, at a family dinner or while riding an elevator with a coworker. Everyone is at edge over politics. Nerves are rubbed raw. Civility has seemingly vanished.

When asked to rate the level of political division in the country on a scale of 0-100, where 0 is no division and 100 is the edge of a civil war, the mean response is 71, according to the Georgetown University Institute of Public Service. A similar share of Americans tell Pew they worry about political disagreements triggering more violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ben Klutsey

Our views on the issues haven't changed that much over the past several decades. If anything, we’ve moved a little bit closer to each other. But the way we feel about each other has changed over time," said Ben Klutsey, director of the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center.

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘A truly pluralistic society has both inclusion and dissent’: A conversation with Ben Klutsey

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the sixth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

The documentary film “Undivide Us” brings together Americans from across the political spectrum for conversations about abortion, immigration, guns and other controversial issues. According to Ben Klutsey, who helped facilitate the conversations, “Participants came in expecting shouting matches, but they ended up exchanging phone numbers and wanting to stay connected because they found each other to be incredibly interesting. People are not as polarized as we think they are when we look at our screens and social media.”

This could also serve as a mission statement for Klutsey, who directs the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center, a libertarian research center housed at George Mason University. At Mercatus, Klutsey is attempting to build a community of students and scholars who can exchange ideas and coexist with one another peacefully despite their political differences. Klutsey also regularly interviews leading thinkers about liberalism for the online journal Discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less
Andrew Yang

The Forward Party, founded by Andrew Yang, "will greatly increase the overall health of our democracy while helping to put the power back into the hands of voters," writes Copenhaver.

Marco Bello/Getty Images

Identifying division is easy; finding points of agreement is difficult

Copenhaver, a former mayor of Augusta, Ga., hosts “The Changemaker Podcast and is a founding partner of Starts With Us.

Negative campaigning is increasing in volume and nastiness every election cycle. Campaigns are based on a “divide and conquer” strategy, pitting citizens against each other. If you ask most political operatives why this is the case, they’ll tell you it’s because it works. It drives donations, volunteer engagement and turnout. And while I won’t debate that it works, it’s not the only approach that works.

Keep ReadingShow less
Caroline Mehl

"Some of the biggest factors causing polarization today are identity-based issues," said Caroline Mehl. "Issues that touch on identity tend to be the things that are the most difficult to talk about and the things that bring people furthest apart."

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

'We’re in the danger zone': A conversation with Caroline Mehl

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the third in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

College campuses are often depicted as “ivory towers,” purposefully set apart from the rest of the world so that students and faculty can pursue intellectual inquiry in an unfettered way. But of course, colleges are not immune to what happens in the world beyond their gates. This includes the problem of political polarization.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mark Gerzon headshot

Meet the change leaders: Mark Gerzon

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Mark Gerzon, president and founder of Mediators Foundation, has specialized in leadership that bridges divides. His concern about the increasing polarization in America led him to devote the past three decades to working on the ideological frontier between the left and right.

Keep ReadingShow less