Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A clarion call to support Ronald Reagan’s Russia evil empire doctrine

A clarion call to support Ronald Reagan’s Russia evil empire doctrine

President Ronald Reagan, campaigning for a second term of office, smiles during a rally speech at the California State Capitol the day before the 1984 presidential election.

Photo by © Wally McNamee/CORBIS/Corbis via Getty Images

Steve Corbin is Professor Emeritus of Marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Very few media outlets published information about the February 19, 2023 pro-Putin rally or the multitude of Republicans and other influential politicians being pro-Putin and anti-support for Ukraine.


Many within the GOP have witnessed their party evolve from promoting isolationism in the 1930’s to moving progressively forward with Dwight Eisenhower’s D-Day victory (1944) and Ronald Reagan’s 1983 warning of Russia’s evil empire.

Reagan’s historic diplomacy – applauded by all patriotic Americans -- ended the Cold War. Reagan – a moralist -- would support America aiding Ukraine and denouncing Vladimir Putin’s unfounded aggression.

All of the living former U.S. presidents, with the exception of Donald Trump, have publicly condemned Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Trump’s 2017-2021 presidency permitted our international diplomacy to take a back seat, reverting many Republicans’ thinking back to its 1930’s authoritarian stance.

An alarm should be sounded knowing many of today’s Republicans have made an about-face rejection of the Reagan doctrine that yielded constructive results for US interests and global democracy.

Rupert Murdoch founded Fox News and the six members of his conservative right-wing Wall Street Journal editorial board solemnly stated in its March 16 op-ed, “If Ukraine manages a victory even as Republicans call for retreat, the GOP will have surrendered one of its core selling points as the party voters trust on national security. It would then be all the harder to marshal support and resources for a stronger U.S. military deterrent against China. ... China and Russia and Iran are combining forces to threaten the U.S. in a way not seen since the 1980’s.”

Many Republicans who are pro-Putin are currently holding or seeking political office. Others are broadcasting their support of Russian aggression. They include: Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson (Fox News), Gov. Ron DeSantis (FL), Michael Flynn, Nick Fuentas (Am. First PAC), Rep. Matt Gaetz (FL), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), Rep. Paul Gosar (AZ), Laura Ingraham (Fox News), Charlie Kirk (Turning Point USA), Rep. Kevin McCarthy (CA), Rep. Mary Miller (IL), Peter Navarro, Candace Owens (Daily Wire), Rep. Scott Perry (CA), Erik Prince (Blackwater), Rep. Wendy Rogers (AZ), Rep. Matt Rosendale (MT), Roger Stone, Donald Trump, Jr., Donald J. Trump and Sen. J.D. Vance (OH).

Attending a Feb. 19 pro-Putin rally at Washington, DC’s Lincoln Memorial were Emerita Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (Independent,), Emeritus Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Democrat), Emeritus Rep. Ron Paul (Libertarian) and Jill Stein (Green Party).

The pro-Putin and pro-Russian frenzy gets crazier. And, there’s not been much media attention to this development either.

Several groups – independent from one another -- reveal “the Kremlin has deployed disinformation themes and tactics to weaken US support for Kyiv with help from conservative media stars and some Republicans in Congress” (The Guardian, March 16).

Think tanks that track disinformation propaganda note “social media platforms like Parler, Rumble, Gab and Odysee have increasingly been used to spread Russian falsehoods.” The Guardian article reveals GOP House Freedom Caucus members Marjorie Taylor Greene, Scott Perry and Paul Gosar are advancing pro-Russian messages while Tucker Carlson ( Fox News) and podcaster Steve Bannon “have promoted some of the most baseless claims that help bolster the Kremlin’s aggression.”

It’s possible the next president of the United States will be pro-Putin despite 91% of Americans having an unfavorable opinion of Putin (Gallup, March 13) and despite the International Criminal Court issuing an arrest warrant to Putin for war crimes and kidnapping over 6,000 Ukrainian children.

Upholding Reagan’s peace through strength message against Russia, China, Iran and North Korea must be upheld by all patriotic Americans. As The Wall Street Journal sternly warns, if not “the country and world are in more trouble than we have imagined.”

Read More

U.S. Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Overnight Strike: What It Means for Washington

President of Venezuela Nicolás Maduro on November 21, 2025 in Caracas, Venezuela.

(Photo by Jesus Vargas/Getty Images)

U.S. Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Overnight Strike: What It Means for Washington

The United States carried out a “large‑scale strike” on Venezuela early Saturday, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in a rapid military operation that lasted less than 30 minutes. President Donald Trump confirmed that the pair were “captured and flown out of the country” to face narco‑terrorism charges in U.S. courts.

Explosions and low‑flying aircraft were reported across Caracas as U.S. forces—identified by officials as Delta Force—hit multiple military and government sites. Venezuelan officials said civilians were killed, though the scale of casualties remains unclear.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meta Undermining Trust but Verify through Paid Links
Facebook launches voting resource tool
Facebook launches voting resource tool

Meta Undermining Trust but Verify through Paid Links

Facebook is testing limits on shared external links, which would become a paid feature through their Meta Verified program, which costs $14.99 per month.

This change solidifies that verification badges are now meaningless signifiers. Yet it wasn’t always so; the verified internet was built to support participation and trust. Beginning with Twitter’s verification program launched in 2009, a checkmark next to a username indicated that an account had been verified to represent a notable person or official account for a business. We could believe that an elected official or a brand name was who they said they were online. When Twitter Blue, and later X Premium, began to support paid blue checkmarks in November of 2022, the visual identification of verification became deceptive. Think Fake Eli Lilly accounts posting about free insulin and impersonation accounts for Elon Musk himself.

This week’s move by Meta echoes changes at Twitter/X, despite the significant evidence that it leaves information quality and user experience in a worse place than before. Despite what Facebook says, all this tells anyone is that you paid.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Fulcrum Opens Applications for 2026 Summer Journalism Fellowship

a person is writing into a notebook

The Fulcrum Opens Applications for 2026 Summer Journalism Fellowship

The Fulcrum is now accepting applications for its 2026 Fulcrum Fellowship, a 10‑week summer program designed to train the next generation of journalists in solutions‑focused reporting and narrative complexity. The fellowship will run from June 8 through August 14, 2026 and is part of The Fulcrum’s broader NextGen initiative, which aims to expand opportunities for emerging journalists across the country.

The Fulcrum Fellowship builds on the success of its inaugural cohort and reflects the organization’s commitment to nurturing young journalists who can move beyond polarized, one‑dimensional storytelling. The program helps storytellers illuminate not only the challenges facing democracy but also the responses and innovations happening in communities nationwide. Fellows learn to produce stories that counter oversimplified narratives and elevate underrepresented voices.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does either party actually want to win the Senate race in Texas?

US Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) speaks during an "Oversight and Government Reform" hearing on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 12, 2025. (Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Does either party actually want to win the Senate race in Texas?

One of the worst features of the election primary system in our polarized “Red vs. Blue” time is the tendency of primary voters to flock to the candidate they most want to “destroy” the other party, not the candidate best positioned to do so.

Let’s say a zombie is scratching at your door. You’ve got a shotgun, a handgun and your favorite frying pan. The shotgun has the greatest chance of success, the handgun — if one is careful and skilled — has a solid chance of working, and the frying pan? It probably won’t dispatch the threat but, come on, how cool would it be to take out a zombie with a frying pan? So, you go with that.

Keep ReadingShow less