Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A clarion call to support Ronald Reagan’s Russia evil empire doctrine

A clarion call to support Ronald Reagan’s Russia evil empire doctrine

President Ronald Reagan, campaigning for a second term of office, smiles during a rally speech at the California State Capitol the day before the 1984 presidential election.

Photo by © Wally McNamee/CORBIS/Corbis via Getty Images

Steve Corbin is Professor Emeritus of Marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Very few media outlets published information about the February 19, 2023 pro-Putin rally or the multitude of Republicans and other influential politicians being pro-Putin and anti-support for Ukraine.


Many within the GOP have witnessed their party evolve from promoting isolationism in the 1930’s to moving progressively forward with Dwight Eisenhower’s D-Day victory (1944) and Ronald Reagan’s 1983 warning of Russia’s evil empire.

Reagan’s historic diplomacy – applauded by all patriotic Americans -- ended the Cold War. Reagan – a moralist -- would support America aiding Ukraine and denouncing Vladimir Putin’s unfounded aggression.

All of the living former U.S. presidents, with the exception of Donald Trump, have publicly condemned Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Trump’s 2017-2021 presidency permitted our international diplomacy to take a back seat, reverting many Republicans’ thinking back to its 1930’s authoritarian stance.

An alarm should be sounded knowing many of today’s Republicans have made an about-face rejection of the Reagan doctrine that yielded constructive results for US interests and global democracy.

Rupert Murdoch founded Fox News and the six members of his conservative right-wing Wall Street Journal editorial board solemnly stated in its March 16 op-ed, “If Ukraine manages a victory even as Republicans call for retreat, the GOP will have surrendered one of its core selling points as the party voters trust on national security. It would then be all the harder to marshal support and resources for a stronger U.S. military deterrent against China. ... China and Russia and Iran are combining forces to threaten the U.S. in a way not seen since the 1980’s.”

Many Republicans who are pro-Putin are currently holding or seeking political office. Others are broadcasting their support of Russian aggression. They include: Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson (Fox News), Gov. Ron DeSantis (FL), Michael Flynn, Nick Fuentas (Am. First PAC), Rep. Matt Gaetz (FL), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), Rep. Paul Gosar (AZ), Laura Ingraham (Fox News), Charlie Kirk (Turning Point USA), Rep. Kevin McCarthy (CA), Rep. Mary Miller (IL), Peter Navarro, Candace Owens (Daily Wire), Rep. Scott Perry (CA), Erik Prince (Blackwater), Rep. Wendy Rogers (AZ), Rep. Matt Rosendale (MT), Roger Stone, Donald Trump, Jr., Donald J. Trump and Sen. J.D. Vance (OH).

Attending a Feb. 19 pro-Putin rally at Washington, DC’s Lincoln Memorial were Emerita Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (Independent,), Emeritus Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Democrat), Emeritus Rep. Ron Paul (Libertarian) and Jill Stein (Green Party).

The pro-Putin and pro-Russian frenzy gets crazier. And, there’s not been much media attention to this development either.

Several groups – independent from one another -- reveal “the Kremlin has deployed disinformation themes and tactics to weaken US support for Kyiv with help from conservative media stars and some Republicans in Congress” (The Guardian, March 16).

Think tanks that track disinformation propaganda note “social media platforms like Parler, Rumble, Gab and Odysee have increasingly been used to spread Russian falsehoods.” The Guardian article reveals GOP House Freedom Caucus members Marjorie Taylor Greene, Scott Perry and Paul Gosar are advancing pro-Russian messages while Tucker Carlson ( Fox News) and podcaster Steve Bannon “have promoted some of the most baseless claims that help bolster the Kremlin’s aggression.”

It’s possible the next president of the United States will be pro-Putin despite 91% of Americans having an unfavorable opinion of Putin (Gallup, March 13) and despite the International Criminal Court issuing an arrest warrant to Putin for war crimes and kidnapping over 6,000 Ukrainian children.

Upholding Reagan’s peace through strength message against Russia, China, Iran and North Korea must be upheld by all patriotic Americans. As The Wall Street Journal sternly warns, if not “the country and world are in more trouble than we have imagined.”

Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less