Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Americans desperately want bipartisan Congress and a centrist president

Americans desperately want bipartisan Congress and a centrist president

Steve Corbin is Professor Emeritus of Marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

The numbers are in. It’s abundantly clear Americans not only want the divisive Congress to quit playing games and become bipartisan leaders – like the good old days – but in 2024 cast Joe Biden and Donald Trump aside and elect a middle-of-the-road president.


Regarding bipartisanship, the latest PBS NewsHour, NPR and Marist poll reveals 74% of Americans want Congress to work together. Similarly, a Gallup poll reveals only 16% of Americans consider themselves “very conservative” or “very liberal.” In Congress we know these fringe groups are represented by the wacko right-wing Freedom Caucus and the out-of-touch left-wing Progressive Caucus.

Americans are demanding our Congressional delegates start acting like adults, abandon their respective weird partisan affiliation groups, view compromise as healthy and put people-before-politics . . . or . . . we’ll replace them with a bipartisan legislator.

The not-for-profit Bipartisan Policy Center, founded in 2007 by former Senators Howard Baker (Rep.), Tom Daschle (Dem), Bob Dole (Rep.) and George Mitchell (Dem.), along with the non-profit No Labels, founded in 2010 to bring America’s leaders together to solve big problems, identify a host of across-the-aisle endeavors to prove bipartisanship can and has worked.

They include creation of social security (1935), National Interstate and Defense Highways Act (1956), 1964’s Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act of 1965, Americans with Disabilities Act (1990), 1997-Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Balanced Budget Act (1997), and 2015-Every Student Succeeds Act.

Americans who favor bipartisanship ought to pay attention to the Problem Solvers Caucus, which was created in 2017 by No Labels. The caucus is now an independent US House of Representatives’ assembly that is driven by over 60 members -- equally divided between Democrats and Republicans -- who foster impartial, unprejudiced and non-partisan cooperation on key policy issues. The Senate does not have a caucus format, but many senators are allies to the Problem Solvers Caucus.

The Problem Solvers Caucus has played a significant role in making bipartisan deals such as the COVID-19 relief bill, ongoing health coverage for veterans exposed to military burn pits, $973 billion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021), gun safety bill (2022), CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 and the Election Count Reform Act (2022).

On April 19, the Problem Solvers Caucus announced “its endorsement of a bipartisan debt ceiling framework comprised of steps to avoid defaulting on the national debt and advancing a sustainable budget.” The members are also addressing the immigration and border security issue, which has plagued Americans since 2014. With a divided Senate and House of Representatives, we know bipartisanship is required for these two important issues to be resolved. The Problem Solvers Caucus is coming to Americans’ rescue.

On Nov. 5, 2024, we will elect the next president and early polling speaks volumes. First, 65% of Americans don’t want Biden OR Trump to run again (Morning Consult). Secondly, a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll revealed nearly 60% of Americans would consider voting for a moderate independent if Biden and Trump seek office.

Who understands this data? No Labels, America’s centrist organization. They recently announced plans to lay the groundwork for an independent Unity ticket in 2024. This option is billed as an `insurance policy’ that will only be used if the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees are not acceptable. Logically, this announcement has greatly disturbed GOP and Democrat partisans.

If you want Congress to become more bipartisan and/or believe we need a centrist president in 2024, follow the Bipartisan Policy Center, No Labels and Problem Solvers Caucus as they are onto something that’s long overdue. Also, go to https://problemsolverscaucus.house.gov to see if your legislator is listed as a bipartisan Congressional delegate.

Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs at a rally, one reads, "Trump is not above the law."

Protesters gather at a Nobody Is Above the Law rally protesting President Trump's interference in the Mueller investigation on November 08, 2018 in Washington, DC.

Larry French/Getty Images

The Double Standard Presidency: When We Watch Leaders Act Above the Law

Americans are told that no one is above the law. Yet every day, they watch a president behave in ways that would get any ordinary citizen fired, disciplined, confronted, or held accountable — and they watch some Americans excuse it. What makes this moment even more striking is that critics across the political spectrum, including conservatives, now warn that the presidency is operating on a dangerous double standard. This is not a partisan concern. It is a constitutional one. And it is tearing at the fabric of our democracy.

For generations, the Constitution has provided guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, oversight mechanisms, and limits on executive authority — designed to prevent any leader from functioning above the law. The framers feared concentrated power more than anything else. They believed that the presidency must be constrained not only by written law but by norms of restraint, dignity, and respect for institutions. Those norms held for centuries because presidents understood that the office was larger than any individual, and Congress understood that oversight was not optional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Latino immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos differ sharply in how much their identity shapes their daily lives, according to recent findings from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 National Survey of Latinos. The survey shows that Latino immigrants are far more likely than U.S.-born Latinos to say their identity is central to who they are, and that it influences their experiences in the United States. Pew researchers Gabriel Piña, Mark Hugo Lopez, Sahana Mukherjee, Dalia Fahmy, and Alexandra Cahn report that the divide reflects differences in cultural connection, lived experience, and generational distance from immigrant roots.

Pew’s analysis finds that Latino immigrants are significantly more likely to say their origins are central to their identity, while U.S.-born Latinos — especially those in the third generation or higher — are less likely to feel that connection. The report notes that “U.S. Hispanics are divided on whether their identity helps or hurts them in America,” with some respondents describing their Latino identity as a source of pride and connection, and others saying it is tied to discrimination or barriers.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less