Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Electing 2020 election deniers may end democracy

Kari Lake; election deniers

Arizona's Kari Lake is one of more than 300 election deniers running for office in 2022.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

The serious registered voter is approaching Nov. 8’s midterm election by studying issues, candidate credentials and party platforms. A clear-headed voter will vote for the best qualified candidate regardless of their political party affiliation.

Uninformed voters are those lemmings – many times blinded and duped by party propaganda – who vote a straight ticket without giving it a second thought. (And then they act dumbfounded when politicians and their party pull the wool over their eyes. Dah.)


The 12 most pressing Nov. 8 election issues Americans face, as revealed by an Oct. 20 Pew Research Center report include: economy, education, election integrity, energy policy, foreign policy, future of democracy, gun policy, health care, immigration, reproductive rights, Supreme Court appointments and violent crime.

Seventy percent of the people surveyed by Pew noted the future of democracy is “very important.” Multiple media sources claim the results from the 2022 midterm election may give us a hint as to whether we’ll remain a democracy or revert to authoritarian and fascism rule.

The “Freedom in the World 2022” report issued by Freedom House states America is one of the top five countries in the world with the largest 10-year decline of democracy attributes; “Global freedom faces a dire threat. ... [T]he enemies of liberal democracy ... are accelerating their attacks.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The Brookings Institution notes there are 345 people on the ballot – all Republican – who are 2020 presidential election deniers. As noted in the Jan. 11, 2021, issue of Scientific American, “scholars said the predominance of election deniers in the GOP bears alarming similarities to authoritarian movements in other countries.”

On Sept. 8, ABC News reported Donald Trump, from the 2016 primary election through today, “has made election denialism a central part of his campaigns and of Republican politics.” Yet, in December of 2020, Trump said to his staff – multiple times – “I don’t want people to know that we lost.”

Ruth Ben-Ghiat, author of “Strongmen: Mussolini to the present” and an authoritarian and fascism scholar at New York University, claims “election denialism is a form of corruption.”

For the record, 100 percent of America’s 3,006 county auditors certified the 2020 vote, 63 court cases and Donald Trump’s attorney general, Bill Barr, also certified the election results. There were only 16 charged cases of voting illegally out of 158,397,726 ballots cast.

Of concern to the Brookings authors are governors, secretaries of state and attorneys general who “will have a great deal to say about how elections in their state will be run in the future” And, “denying the results of a fair election is threatening to the electoral process and American democracy.”

Even Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch’s very own conservative-based Wall Street Journal discussed in the Oct. 18 and Oct. 20 issues the chaos the Nov. 8 election results may create for America. Races with Republican election deniers include Senate contests in Arizona, Georgia, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania plus gubernatorial races in Arizona and Pennsylvania. Lisa Lerer of The New York Times agrees with the Journal’s watch-list but also says to note the outcome of GOP election deniers in the Nevada and Wisconsin Senate races.

Keep tabs of the above mentioned nine race results plus the other 336 election-deniers seeking state and federal office. The outcome may indeed be a precursor to America remaining a democracy or reverting to authoritarian and fascist rule.

On or before Nov. 8, will you vote with a serious, fact-based and clear-headed demeanor or get hoodwinked by the GOP’s fraudulent election denialism scam?

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump

Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

Scholars unmask Trump election lawyers’ use of falsified evidence

Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

After 2022’s midterm election, I had an email exchange with Robert Beadles, a combative northern Nevada businessman and Donald Trump devotee. His post-2020 hounding of Reno’s top election official had pushed her to resign. Beadles didn’t trust the midterm results either and offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who’d prove that it was not stolen.

Easy money, right? Beadles’ distrust was tribal. But his reward hinged on refuting a statistical analysis that he waved like the flag. His statistician, Edward Solomon, who lived halfway across the country, found mathematical aberrations in the results that he didn’t like. The men claimed that was proof enough that the announced election results were dishonest.

I, and several experienced analysts — a math PhD, a computer scientist, and an election auditor who had spent years studying election systems, voting data, and procedures — tried to explain why the statistics, alone, did not prove anything. We politely told him what records to obtain, why they mattered, what methodologies to use. Beadles didn’t care and soon lashed out.

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less