Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Countering Terrorism: Pushing Back Fear

Countering Terrorism: Pushing Back Fear

People commemorate the victims of NYE terror attack on Bourbon Street, New Orleans, USA, January 6, 2025.

(Photo by Patrick O'niell Little Jr/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025 have brought an onslaught of terror attacks and tumult. While the incidents that occurred over the last several months may not be connected, they do usher in a sense of chaos and fear.

As a country, to meet this moment of terror, we must all look both outwards and inwards.


All while balancing the public’s safety and protecting our beloved freedoms.

While not exhaustive, here are a few of the terror-inducing events that have occurred over the last several months:

On Dec. 4, 2024, Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was shot and killed in Midtown Manhattan, New York City, in a “brazen, targeted attack” as he walked toward a hotel, New York police said. Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing Thompson, was later charged with 11 counts, including murder in the second degree as a crime of terrorism.

Debrina Kawam of Toms River, N.J., was burned alive on Dec. 22, 2024, on a New York City subway. Kawam was asleep on a subway train that stopped at a station in Brooklyn’s Coney Island when her clothes were set ablaze. Sebastian Zapeta-Calil allegedly fanned the flames with a shirt, engulfing her in the blaze, before sitting on a platform bench and watching as she burned. Zapeta-Calil pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and other charges.

A total of 14 people were killed, and 35 people were injured after a man drove a truck into a crowd at Bourbon and Canal streets in New Orleans on New Year's Day in a terrorist attack, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI). The FBI confirmed the identity of the suspected driver of the truck as Shamsud-Din Jabbar of Texas. Jabbar was an Army Veteran who claimed to be a member of ISIS. He had an ISIS flag, an ice chest with pipe bombs, guns, and IEDs at the time of the attack. Jabbar was killed after being shot by the New Orleans Police Department.

The FBI shared that Jabbar said he joined ISIS before the summer and had originally planned to kill his family but felt that killing his family "would not focus on the war between the believers and disbelievers."

Also on New Year's Day, another Army veteran fatally shot himself in a Tesla Cybertruck just before it blew up outside the Trump hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. Matthew Livelsberger, a 37-year-old Green Beret from Colorado Springs, Colorado, left notes saying the New Year’s Day explosion “Was not a terrorist attack, it was a wakeup call. Americans only pay attention to spectacles and violence. What better way to get my point across than a stunt with fireworks and explosives.”

The FBI defines domestic terrorism as “Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.” International terrorism differs in that those violent acts or crimes “are committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored).”

The goal of a terrorist, foreign or domestic, is to instill fear into our communities. Anyone who lived through the deadliest terrorist attack on American soil on Sept. 11, 2001, knows this to be true.

Our society can deal with these intrusions on our safety and security and push back on our fears by looking outward to our leaders and elected officials and inward by strengthening our personal relationships and communities.

Citizens can hope that the elected officials who were recently elected, as well as the leaders of our institutions, will take our collective security seriously. We should also expect that those very leaders will share accurate information and not spew misinformation or share inaccurate reporting on the suspects or perpetrators of these crimes.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has a wealth of resources on its website to prevent targeted violence and terrorism, including a Prevention Resource Finder. These resources include community support, grant funding opportunities, information-sharing platforms, evidence-based research, bullying, depression, domestic violence, mental health support, gun safety best practices, and training opportunities for communities to reduce the risk of targeted violence, including hate-based targeted violence.

DHS suggests that preventing targeted violence and terrorism requires a community approach. Their list of community members includes educators, law enforcement, health care practitioners, behavioral and mental health professionals, faith-based organizations, and state, local, tribal, and territorial governments.

Omitted from DHS’ list is each of us as individuals, who are called to do our part. Just look at the words from our national anthem, “The Star-Spangled Banner,” which reminds us that we live in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

The FBI’s Counterterrorism Division recommends US citizens can:

  • Report suspicious activity: Individuals can report suspicious activity to the FBI by calling 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) or by visiting tips.fbi.gov.
  • Be aware of signs of radicalization: Individuals can recognize the signs that someone they know might be mobilizing to violence or other criminal activity.
  • Prioritize safety: Individuals should prioritize their safety.

It's important to stay aware of our surroundings without becoming overly anxious. Knowing potential safety concerns can empower us to respond appropriately if we notice something unusual. Being informed can help us feel more secure and prepared.

The fear of terrorism can be debilitating. While it is important to stay informed, limit media exposure, practice relaxation techniques, develop safety plans, seek support from loved ones, and reach out to professionals if anxiety becomes overwhelming.

Essentially, trying to maintain a sense of control by acknowledging fears while focusing on daily life and taking practical steps to mitigate risks are key practices in coping with the anxiety and fear of terrorism and violence.


Read More

news video camera
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

When the Cameras Went Dark: What a Press Ban Reveals About American Journalism

When I came to the United States from India in 1982, I did not trust newspapers. Back home, everyone knew which party a paper favored before reading a line. American television felt different. My family watched Peter Jennings every evening, and later I found Larry King on CNN, who let his guests talk instead of telling viewers what to think. That habit of holding everyone to one standard has mostly faded.

On Sept. 18, President Trump announced he was banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, saying their reporting was fake news. The next morning the Secret Service took reporters’ badges at the gate. The outlets sued on Monday, and Fox, ABC, NBC and CBS declined to take CNN’s turn in the television pool. On Sept. 24, Judge Timothy Kelly, whom Trump appointed, blocked the ban for 14 days. He found the outlets likely to win on due process, because reporters got no notice and no chance to respond, and he doubted the government’s national security explanation. Trump’s answer was to call the judge “totally disloyal.”

Keep ReadingShow less
US Senate candidate Dan Osborn

Nebraska Independent US Senate candidate Dan Osborn.

Image obtained from YouTube

7 Independent Campaigns to Watch in the Final Days of the Midterms

Election Day on November 3, here are the seven independent campaigns we’ve followed closely, four for the Senate and three for the House, ranked by how competitive they are.

Fundraising figures are full-cycle totals from FEC reports, through the date noted for each race. Prediction-market odds come from Kalshi and were pulled on 10/23. Polls are pulled from the aggregated New York Times pages, with several low-quality polls highlighted by campaigns left out.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Patriotic paper ballot featuring red and blue stripes with the word vote

Patriotic paper ballot featuring red and blue stripes with the word vote inserted into a grey cardboard ballot box slot.

Getty Images

The First Amendment Does Not Belong to Political Parties

In a recent essay in Life & Liberty, Robert G. Natelson argues that open primaries may violate the First Amendment rights of political parties by allowing people who are not party members to participate in choosing their nominees. His argument starts with the rights of the party. The more fundamental question is whether it starts in the right place at all: When a state conducts a primary election, whose rights are we even talking about?

Natelson’s answer is primarily the rights of political parties. He argues that because parties have a First Amendment right to decide with whom they associate, the government cannot require them to allow people who are not party members to participate in choosing their nominees. He relies on a number of Supreme Court decisions involving political parties and places particular weight on National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC. But in doing so, he moves too quickly past the most important fact in the debate: a state primary is an election conducted by the government, not a private meeting of a political organization.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media

White House communications aide Danielle Alvarez (R) films with her phone as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media as he departs on the South Lawn of the White House on October 23, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Trump’s Arch Plan Defies Law and Warps D.C.’s Historic Core

The Trump Arch construction controversy is the latest vanity project by Donald Trump using taxpayer money without Congressional approval, placing his ego-based physical stamp on not only American historical architecture but also the American psyche. With no good reason for constructing this arch, it’s an act of self-aggrandizement meant to make him look powerful and important. The project is unconstitutional, illegal, and patently un-American. Three Vietnam War veterans and an architectural historian have also filed a lawsuit against it.

Like all other actors in government, executive agencies, like the National Park Service, must follow the rule of law and respect ‘separation of powers’ established by the U.S. Constitution. This means following the laws enacted by Congress, which has the power to distribute public funds and determine how they are spent, not the Executive Branch, including the President.

Keep ReadingShow less