Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Wipes and sanitizer are good for election security, feds say

Clean election

Poll worker Edgar Moore was fully stocked with cleaning supplies in Miami for Tuesday's primary.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

States may buy hand sanitizer, disinfecting wipes and masks with their federal grant money for bolstering election security.

That permission was granted Tuesday by the Election Assistance Commission, the latest example of how the novel coronavirus is reshaping the exercise of democracy this year.


Weeks before the global pandemic arrived in the United States, President Trump signed legislation in December providing $425 million to the states for security measures to protect election systems from the sort of hacking attempts by foreign operatives that occurred during the 2016 election. That was on top of the $380 million in grants approved in March 2018.

Election officials across the country are now scrambling to make sure Covid-19 does not totally disrupt the nation's voting — especially the wave of primaries this spring and summer for congressional seats and state legislatures and judgeships, even after the Democratic nominating contest is decided.

The EAC said its new guidance came in response to questions from state election officials about using grant money to pay for supplies to keep voting locations clean, assure equipment stays sanitary and minimize the health risks to both the election judges and the electorate.

The agency said it "considers these allowable costs purchased to protect the health and safety of poll workers, staff and voters during federal elections," so long as the expenses for cleaning supplies are reasonable and the material is only used to improve hygiene in federal elections.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Among the concerns: Numerous complaints have been filed with consumer agencies across the country alleging price gouging by vendors selling disinfectants and other cleaning supplies.

Significant anxieties sprang up at polling places across Arizona, Illinois and Florida during Tuesday's presidential primary voting, with complaints that poll workers had no wipes or other cleaning supplies or were not properly using what they had.

Ohio's contest was postponed at the last minute because of health worries, and primaries have now also been postponed in four other states; Maryland, Kentucky, Georgia and Louisiana.

The EAC is also acting as an online information clearinghouse for state and local election officials on how they should respond to the coronavirus pandemic.

The most recent round of grant money has ranged from $38.7 million for California down to $600,000 each for Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming

Read More

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

Someone filling out a ballot.

Getty Images / Hill Street Studios

Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

In the 2024 U.S. election, several states did not pass ballot initiatives to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) despite strong majority support from voters under 65. Still, RCV was defended in Alaska, passed by a landslide in Washington, D.C., and has earned majority support in 31 straight pro-RCV city ballot measures. Still, some critics of RCV argue that it does not enhance and promote democratic principles as much as forms of proportional representation (PR), as commonly used throughout Europe and Latin America.

However, in the U.S. many people have not heard of PR. The question under consideration is whether implementing RCV serves as a stepping stone to PR by building public understanding and support for reforms that move away from winner-take-all systems. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of respondents (N=1000) on the 2022 Cooperative Election Survey (CES), results show that individuals who favor RCV often also know about and back PR. When comparing other types of electoral reforms, RCV uniquely transfers into support for PR, in ways that support for nonpartisan redistricting and the national popular vote do not. These findings can inspire efforts that demonstrate how RCV may facilitate the adoption of PR in the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less