Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Wipes and sanitizer are good for election security, feds say

Clean election

Poll worker Edgar Moore was fully stocked with cleaning supplies in Miami for Tuesday's primary.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

States may buy hand sanitizer, disinfecting wipes and masks with their federal grant money for bolstering election security.

That permission was granted Tuesday by the Election Assistance Commission, the latest example of how the novel coronavirus is reshaping the exercise of democracy this year.


Weeks before the global pandemic arrived in the United States, President Trump signed legislation in December providing $425 million to the states for security measures to protect election systems from the sort of hacking attempts by foreign operatives that occurred during the 2016 election. That was on top of the $380 million in grants approved in March 2018.

Election officials across the country are now scrambling to make sure Covid-19 does not totally disrupt the nation's voting — especially the wave of primaries this spring and summer for congressional seats and state legislatures and judgeships, even after the Democratic nominating contest is decided.

The EAC said its new guidance came in response to questions from state election officials about using grant money to pay for supplies to keep voting locations clean, assure equipment stays sanitary and minimize the health risks to both the election judges and the electorate.

The agency said it "considers these allowable costs purchased to protect the health and safety of poll workers, staff and voters during federal elections," so long as the expenses for cleaning supplies are reasonable and the material is only used to improve hygiene in federal elections.

Among the concerns: Numerous complaints have been filed with consumer agencies across the country alleging price gouging by vendors selling disinfectants and other cleaning supplies.

Significant anxieties sprang up at polling places across Arizona, Illinois and Florida during Tuesday's presidential primary voting, with complaints that poll workers had no wipes or other cleaning supplies or were not properly using what they had.

Ohio's contest was postponed at the last minute because of health worries, and primaries have now also been postponed in four other states; Maryland, Kentucky, Georgia and Louisiana.

The EAC is also acting as an online information clearinghouse for state and local election officials on how they should respond to the coronavirus pandemic.

The most recent round of grant money has ranged from $38.7 million for California down to $600,000 each for Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming


Read More

The American Experiment at the Brink Due To  Minority Rule

Can America overcome minority rule? Examining the Electoral College, NPVIC, campaign finance, and democratic reform in the 21st century.

adamkaz / Getty Images

The American Experiment at the Brink Due To Minority Rule

The challenge for continuing the American Experiment is recovering from the "Second Gilded Age" (1980s to the present). As of early 2026, the U.S. national debt is 122% to 125% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This situation has been exacerbated since 2000, when the U.S. national debt as a percentage of GDP was 33% to 35%. Americans can attribute this worsening situation to two non-popular vote presidents, Bush-43 and Trump-45. Directly, during their terms, and indirectly, with the aftermath of the 2008 Great recession and the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 1894, toward the end of the 19th century “Gilded Age," the U.S. national debt was approximately 7% of gross domestic product GDP.

Minority rule occurs when a numerical or ideological minority holds the power to consistently thwart the will of the majority or govern over them. It thrives through the coordinated reinforcement of specific electoral, institutional, and legal mechanisms.

Keep ReadingShow less
Full frame shot of pins that say “vote” with red, white, and blue American flag theme.

An analysis of Project 2025, the Electoral College, and the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, examining democracy, representation, and presidential elections.

Adrienne Bresnahan / Getty Images

Spirit of 1776 – Rejected by Project 2025, Embraced by NPVIC

Project 2025 is a structural undoing of the "Spirit of 1776." It fundamentally undermines the foundational principles of the Declaration of Independence in the following areas: democratic representation, equality, liberty, and checks/balances. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) restores the founding ideals of civic equality.

Spirit of 1776 – Rejected by Project 2025, Embraced by NPVIC

Keep ReadingShow less
California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

California voters increasingly distrust both major parties. Here's why the state's Top Two primary gives independent voters more power to shape elections.

Image: Duncan Shelby on Alamy.

California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

SAN DIEGO, Calif. - California voters have already received ballots for the June 2 primary, and the message they have going into these elections may not be what the political class wants to hear: They are not thrilled with either major party.

A recent analysis from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) found that majorities of likely voters have unfavorable views of both parties—61% unfavorable toward the Democratic Party and 70% unfavorable toward the Republican Party.

Keep ReadingShow less
How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

President Lyndon B. Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr., Clarence Mitchell Jr., Patricia Roberts Harris, and other guests at the signing of the Voting Rights Act on August 6, 1965.

Yoichi Okamoto - Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum

How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

In 2002, U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla, a Republican, nearly lost his South Texas seat to Democrat Henry Cuellar. So when the GOP used its newfound majority in the state Legislature to redraw the voting maps the next year, they sawed through Cuellar’s hometown of Laredo and scattered Latino voters, who tended to vote Democratic, into other districts.

Latino advocacy groups sued under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the cornerstone provision of the law that prevents government bodies from diluting the voting power of specific groups. The Supreme Court found Texas lawmakers had taken away Latino voting power “because they were about to exercise it.”

Keep ReadingShow less