Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Illinois has badly fumbled AVR, and now it's being sued for voting rights abuse

Voters in Illinois

A lawsuit claims Illinois' handling of the AVR system has hindered voter registration in three elections.

Scott Olson/Getty Images

A coalition of progressive advocacy groups is suing Illinois for allegedly botching the rollout of the state's automatic voter registration system for three years.

When the state enacted AVR in 2017, those groups hoped it would modernize and streamline registration and make the ballot box more readily accessible to members of minority groups and non-English speakers. But the lawsuit, filed Friday, alleges the state has badly fumbled the execution, causing repeated record-keeping errors and voter confusion that violate federal voting rights law.

Things are so bad, the plaintiffs maintain, that federal judges in Chicago should take control of the system until it's put right.


AVR has gained in popularity in recent years precisely because it's supposed to make registration simpler for both voters and bureaucrats. Illinois is the second-most-populous, after Calfifornia, of the 16 states (plus D.C.) where eligible people are automatically added to the voter rolls whenever they do business with the motor vehicle bureau — or, in some places, other state agencies that keep personal information on residents.

The suit alleges multiple failings in the state's system. For instance, last month, 774 convicted felons who had re-registered after their release from prison had their registrations canceled due to a "data-matching error." The state Board of Elections corrected this in time for the start of early voting in the March 17 presidential, congressional and legislative primary.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In January, a glitch in the system mistakenly added nearly 600 noncitizens to the rolls after they applied for a driver's license or identification card. They have since been removed.

Under the 2017 law, when voting-age residents go to the DMV to update or obtain their driver's license, a state employee is supposed to check their voter registration status and ensure their address is up to date. But the lawsuit alleges this often doesn't happen, leaving many residents off the voter rolls.

The state's AVR system also has mistakenly suggested that 16-year-olds are eligible to vote, the suit alleges. Only residents who will be 17 before the next primary and 18 before the next general are eligible to register.

The advocacy groups claim the state's handling of AVR has hindered voter registration in three elections: the 2018 midterm and two local elections last year. It also presents "an imminent threat" of doing so again in the primaries and in November.

"Unfortunately, the promise of voter modernization and inclusivity has not only gone unfulfilled, it now appears that even basic voter registration services are mishandled in disregard of repeated calls for transparency and accountability by non-partisan organizations in the state," says the lawsuit, filed by the Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Chicago, Change Illinois, Chicago Votes Education Fund, Common Cause Illinois, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights and the Illinois Public Interest Research Group Education Fund.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less