Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The voting rights movement will, as always, persevere

voting rights rally

Protesters rally in support of the Freedom to Vote Act on Aug. 28, 2021, the 58th anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Morgan is the director of Declaration for American Democracy.

The Senate’s vote against advancing the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act may have been a setback, but it was not a defeat. The fight for the right to vote in America has never been easy. From the passage of the 15th Amendment in 1869 to the civil rights movement of the 1950s and ‘60s, major steps toward enfranchising every American have often been met with resistance but have always pushed forward. As many Republican legislatures across the country continue to introduce and pass anti-voter laws targeting Black and Brown voters, our work is as vital today as it was in 1870 or 1965.

As I reflect on the path ahead for the voting rights community, I’m grateful for the dedicated activists who tirelessly work to ensure every American's freedom to vote and give me hope that transformational change remains on the horizon. The strength, diversity and unity of the groups and individuals who led and showed up for this movement caused the House of Representatives to pass the reforms in the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, made the Senate vote possible and pushed 48 members of the Senate Democratic Caucus to vote in support of rules reform.


Throughout 2021, activists never relented to ensure our elected leaders protect the right to vote, end the overwhelming influence of dark money in our democracy, defend against election sabotage, and guarantee that every American has an equal voice and fair representation in our government. We held regular movement convenings to educate our neighbors on the need for transformational democracy reform, took to the streets in “ Votercades ” to raise awareness and create energy around protecting the right to vote, and hosted innovative actions online and in-person to continue organizing safely during a pandemic. An unprecedented 150 state legislators traveled to D.C. to demand the federal government pass national standards to stop the assault on voting rights taking place in legislatures across the country. As the vote drew nearer, hundreds of activists risked arrest outside the White House in order to demand that President Biden step up to help pass transformative voting rights legislation.

But despite our calls for senators to listen to us, we were let down by those who feel more loyalty to corporate donors and to preserving their own political power than they do to us, the voters who elected them in the first place. Fifty-two Senators voted against updating Senate rules to allow a simple majority vote on the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act. Each of those senators cemented their legacies as roadblocks to legislation that would safeguard our democracy from anti-voter laws intended to sabotage future elections and silence voters of color.

Just as Mary Church Terell, Martin Luther King Jr. and John Lewis persevered, today’s voting rights advocates will persevere to honor our ancestors’ vision of an inclusive democracy that reflects the American people. We will not stop, and we will continue to adapt. Progress can and will be achieved on the local, state and federal levels. The next steps for the voting rights movement are clear: We must continue to organize and advocate until every American has fair representation in our government. As the Senate and Biden administration consider alternative legislation and executive actions, it’s critical our elected leaders prioritize bold, comprehensive solutions that confront the multiple threats facing our democracy.

More than 150 years after ratifying the 15thAmendment, we should not have to keep fighting these fights to ensure the rights of Black and Brown voters, yet activists continue to fight because we know our cause is right and necessary. They’re continuing to call their senators to encourage them to advance voting rights legislation that would have the greatest impact on our democracy. In Texas and Georgia, organizers are continuing robust voter registration and door-to-door canvassing efforts to increase turnout in spite of new anti-voter laws. In cities and counties across the country, advocates for democracy are volunteering or running to fill vital roles as election officials.

It is disappointing to see Democratic senators like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema and Republicans who previously supported the Voting Rights Act, like Sens. Susan Collins, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn, vote against advancing protections for democracy that Americans overwhelmingly support. We must hold all 52 senators who blocked the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act accountable for selling out our democracy, and we must also move beyond this moment and continue to push for reforms in every possible way.

Progress always takes time and effort, but as youth poet laureate Amanda Gorman said, “while democracy can be periodically delayed, it can never be permanently defeated. In this truth, in this faith we trust. For while we have our eyes on the future, history has its eyes on us.”

Make no mistake: The movement to defend and strengthen democracy accomplished incredible feats by having the House pass historic voting rights legislation and then demanding that the Senate debate the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, and we will continue to persevere until we finally achieve a free, fair and equal democracy for every American.

Failure is not an option.

Read More

news app
New platforms help overcome biased news reporting
Tero Vesalainen/Getty Images

The Selective Sanctity of Death: When Empathy Depends on Skin Color

Rampant calls to avoid sharing the video of Charlie Kirk’s death have been swift and emphatic across social media. “We need to keep our souls clean,” journalists plead. “Where are social media’s content moderators?” “How did we get so desensitized?” The moral outrage is palpable; the demands for human dignity urgent and clear.

But as a Black woman who has been forced to witness the constant virality of Black death, I must ask: where was this widespread anger for George Floyd? For Philando Castile? For Daunte Wright? For Tyre Nichols?

Keep ReadingShow less
Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less