Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The voting rights movement will, as always, persevere

Opinion

voting rights rally

Protesters rally in support of the Freedom to Vote Act on Aug. 28, 2021, the 58th anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Morgan is the director of Declaration for American Democracy.

The Senate’s vote against advancing the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act may have been a setback, but it was not a defeat. The fight for the right to vote in America has never been easy. From the passage of the 15th Amendment in 1869 to the civil rights movement of the 1950s and ‘60s, major steps toward enfranchising every American have often been met with resistance but have always pushed forward. As many Republican legislatures across the country continue to introduce and pass anti-voter laws targeting Black and Brown voters, our work is as vital today as it was in 1870 or 1965.

As I reflect on the path ahead for the voting rights community, I’m grateful for the dedicated activists who tirelessly work to ensure every American's freedom to vote and give me hope that transformational change remains on the horizon. The strength, diversity and unity of the groups and individuals who led and showed up for this movement caused the House of Representatives to pass the reforms in the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, made the Senate vote possible and pushed 48 members of the Senate Democratic Caucus to vote in support of rules reform.


Throughout 2021, activists never relented to ensure our elected leaders protect the right to vote, end the overwhelming influence of dark money in our democracy, defend against election sabotage, and guarantee that every American has an equal voice and fair representation in our government. We held regular movement convenings to educate our neighbors on the need for transformational democracy reform, took to the streets in “ Votercades ” to raise awareness and create energy around protecting the right to vote, and hosted innovative actions online and in-person to continue organizing safely during a pandemic. An unprecedented 150 state legislators traveled to D.C. to demand the federal government pass national standards to stop the assault on voting rights taking place in legislatures across the country. As the vote drew nearer, hundreds of activists risked arrest outside the White House in order to demand that President Biden step up to help pass transformative voting rights legislation.

But despite our calls for senators to listen to us, we were let down by those who feel more loyalty to corporate donors and to preserving their own political power than they do to us, the voters who elected them in the first place. Fifty-two Senators voted against updating Senate rules to allow a simple majority vote on the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act. Each of those senators cemented their legacies as roadblocks to legislation that would safeguard our democracy from anti-voter laws intended to sabotage future elections and silence voters of color.

Just as Mary Church Terell, Martin Luther King Jr. and John Lewis persevered, today’s voting rights advocates will persevere to honor our ancestors’ vision of an inclusive democracy that reflects the American people. We will not stop, and we will continue to adapt. Progress can and will be achieved on the local, state and federal levels. The next steps for the voting rights movement are clear: We must continue to organize and advocate until every American has fair representation in our government. As the Senate and Biden administration consider alternative legislation and executive actions, it’s critical our elected leaders prioritize bold, comprehensive solutions that confront the multiple threats facing our democracy.

More than 150 years after ratifying the 15thAmendment, we should not have to keep fighting these fights to ensure the rights of Black and Brown voters, yet activists continue to fight because we know our cause is right and necessary. They’re continuing to call their senators to encourage them to advance voting rights legislation that would have the greatest impact on our democracy. In Texas and Georgia, organizers are continuing robust voter registration and door-to-door canvassing efforts to increase turnout in spite of new anti-voter laws. In cities and counties across the country, advocates for democracy are volunteering or running to fill vital roles as election officials.

It is disappointing to see Democratic senators like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema and Republicans who previously supported the Voting Rights Act, like Sens. Susan Collins, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn, vote against advancing protections for democracy that Americans overwhelmingly support. We must hold all 52 senators who blocked the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act accountable for selling out our democracy, and we must also move beyond this moment and continue to push for reforms in every possible way.

Progress always takes time and effort, but as youth poet laureate Amanda Gorman said, “while democracy can be periodically delayed, it can never be permanently defeated. In this truth, in this faith we trust. For while we have our eyes on the future, history has its eyes on us.”

Make no mistake: The movement to defend and strengthen democracy accomplished incredible feats by having the House pass historic voting rights legislation and then demanding that the Senate debate the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, and we will continue to persevere until we finally achieve a free, fair and equal democracy for every American.

Failure is not an option.

Read More

Mandatory vs. Voluntary Inclusionary Housing: What Cities Are Doing to Create Affordable Homes

affordable housing

Dougal Waters/Getty Images

Mandatory vs. Voluntary Inclusionary Housing: What Cities Are Doing to Create Affordable Homes

As housing costs rise across United States cities, local governments are adopting inclusionary housing policies to ensure that some portion of new residential developments remains affordable. These policies—defined and tracked by organizations like the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy—require or encourage developers to include below-market-rate units in otherwise market-rate projects. Today, over 1,000 towns have implemented some form of inclusionary housing, often in response to mounting pressure to prevent displacement and address racial and economic inequality.

What’s the Difference Between Mandatory and Voluntary Approaches?

Inclusionary housing programs generally fall into two types:

Keep ReadingShow less
Rebuilding Democracy in the Age of Brain Rot
person using laptop computer
Photo by Christin Hume on Unsplash

Rebuilding Democracy in the Age of Brain Rot

We live in a time when anyone with a cellphone carries a computer more powerful than those that sent humans to the moon and back. Yet few of us can sustain a thought beyond a few seconds. One study suggested that the average human attention span dropped from about 12 seconds in 2000 to roughly 8 seconds by 2015—although the accuracy of this figure has been disputed (Microsoft Canada, 2015 Attention Spans Report). Whatever the number, the trend is clear: our ability to focus is not what it used to be.

This contradiction—constant access to unlimited information paired with a decline in critical thinking—perfectly illustrates what Oxford named its 2024 Word of the Year: “brain rot.” More than a funny meme, it represents a genuine threat to democracy. The ability to deeply engage with issues, weigh rival arguments, and participate in collective decision-making is key to a healthy democratic society. When our capacity for focus erodes due to overstimulation, distraction, or manufactured outrage, it weakens our ability to exercise our role as citizens.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump's Clemency for Giuliani et al is Another Effort to Whitewash History and Damage Democracy

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani, September 11, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Trump's Clemency for Giuliani et al is Another Effort to Whitewash History and Damage Democracy

In the earliest days of the Republic, Alexander Hamilton defended giving the president the exclusive authority to grant pardons and reprieves against the charge that doing so would concentrate too much power in one person’s hands. Reading the news of President Trump’s latest use of that authority to reward his motley crew of election deniers and misfit lawyers, I was taken back to what Hamilton wrote in 1788.

He argued that “The principal argument for reposing the power of pardoning in this case to the Chief Magistrate is this: in seasons of insurrection or rebellion, there are often critical moments, when a well- timed offer of pardon to the insurgents or rebels may restore the tranquility of the commonwealth; and which, if suffered to pass unimproved, it may never be possible afterwards to recall.”

Keep ReadingShow less
What the Success Academy Scandal Says About the Charter School Model

Empty classroom with U.S. flag

phi1/Getty Images

What the Success Academy Scandal Says About the Charter School Model

When I was running a school, I knew that every hour of my team’s day mattered. A well-prepared lesson, a timely phone call home to a parent, or a few extra minutes spent helping a struggling student were the kinds of investments that added up to better outcomes for kids.

That is why the leaked recording of Success Academy CEO Eva Moskowitz pressuring staff to lobby elected officials hit me so hard. In an audio first reported by Gothamist, she tells employees, “Every single one of you must make calls,” assigning quotas to contact lawmakers. On September 18th, the network of 59 schools canceled classes for its roughly 22,000 students to bring them to a political rally during the school day. What should have been time for teaching and learning became a political operation.

Keep ReadingShow less