Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

A Passionate Call for More Hill Policy Experts

During two decades representing suburban New Jersey in the House, Democrat Bill Pascrell Jr. has never been known as an outspoken advocate for addressing the institutional weaknesses of Congress. (He's focused instead on addressing blue-collar concerns about taxes and health care on the Ways and means Committee.) But he uncorked a fiery and very much worth reading op-ed in Sunday's Washington Post.

Headlined "Why is Congress so dumb?," it articulates a point of view that's not popular outside the Beltway but is widely shared by people who see the legislative branch as having shriveled in the past quarter-century: Congress would be able to stand up to presidents more forcefully, and repel special interests more consistently, if it spent more to cultivate its own internal experts.


He's hoping the new Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress makes that a top recommendation, concluding: "After decades of disinvesting in itself, Congress has become captured by outside interests and partisans. Lawmakers should be guided by independent scholars, researchers and policy specialists. We must recognize our difficulties in comprehending an impossibly complex world."

Read More

Texas redistricting maps

Two bills have been introduced to Congress that aim to ban mid-decade redistricting on the federal level and contain provisions making an exception for mid-decade redistricting.

Tamir Kalifa/Getty Images

Congress Bill Spotlight: Anti-Rigging Act, Banning Mid-Decade Redistricting As Texas and California Are Attempting

Trump claims Republicans are “entitled” to five more Texas House seats.

Context: in the news

In August, the Republican-controlled Texas state legislature approved a rare “mid-decade” redistricting for U.S. House seats, with President Donald Trump’s encouragement.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independent Madness- or How the Cheshire Cat Can Slay the Gerrymander

The Cheshire Cat (John Tenniel) Devouring the Gerrymander (Elkanah Tisdale )

Independent Madness- or How the Cheshire Cat Can Slay the Gerrymander

America has a long, if erratic, history of expanding its democratic franchise. Over the last two centuries, “representation” grew to embrace former slaves, women, and eighteen-year-olds, while barriers to voting like literacy tests and outright intimidation declined. Except, that is, for one key group, Independents and Third-party voters- half the electorate- who still struggle to gain ballot access and exercise their authentic democratic voice.

Let’s be realistic: most third parties aren't deluding themselves about winning a single-member election, even if they had equal ballot access. “Independents” – that sprawling, 40-percent-strong coalition of diverse policy positions, people, and gripes – are too diffuse to coalesce around a single candidate. So gerrymanderers assume they will reluctantly vote for one of the two main parties. Relegating Independents to mere footnotes in the general election outcome, since they’re also systematically shut out of party primaries, where 9 out of 10 elections are determined.

Keep ReadingShow less