Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A Veterans Day message

A Veterans Day message
Getty Images

Welcome to November, a month of vivid landscapes and reflective moments. As we approach Veterans Day, our thoughts naturally turn to the diverse and nuanced experiences of veterans.

This is a time not only for gratitude but also for deeper understanding. An organization called Veterans for All Voters reminds us to extend our recognition beyond a simple “thank you.”


The Veterans Day Message was written by Navy veterans Todd Connor and Eric Bronner of Veterans for All Voters. Their words resonate deeply and underscore the importance of active, meaningful engagement.

The Message

With Veterans Day upon us, it’s appropriate to thank military veterans and their family members for their service. There is something else we can do, though, and that is to ask them to continue serving by working to shore up our fragile republican democracy. To really honor veterans, and to allow them to continue to serve us as civilians, we need to grant them full access to civic life.

This begins, most importantly, with voting — where in 2020, almost 26 million independent Americans, including hundreds of thousands of military veterans, were barred by state election laws from participating in the presidential preference primaries. This unnecessary structural defect means that many Active Duty independent voters and veterans can’t even vote for their next Commander in Chief.

8B7A5172 (1)_edited.jpg

The two of us are proud Navy veterans. We learned and grew so much during our time of service. We are grateful for this country, our fellow citizens, and the opportunity to serve. Because we love this country so much, we have decided — as many veterans do — to continue serving. In our case, we are building and mobilizing a community of fellow military veterans to advocate for healthy electoral competition that will, in turn, make our politics less toxic.

Our organization, Veterans for All Voters, is fighting to let all voters — including over 50% of military voters who are independent (nonpartisan/unaffiliated) — fully participate in their taxpayer-funded public elections. Through open and competitive elections, we can make our government more responsible and politicians more accountable to all of us.

So, today, if you would like to thank one of our more than 285 veteran leaders in 47 states for their service, please consider one of the following actions:

  • Join the nonpartisan reform movement and advocate for structural reforms that allow all eligible voters to fully participate in elections.
  • Introduce a veteran or anyone who is “military-connected” to Veterans for All Voters.
  • Donate to our nonpartisan nonprofit that is making a tremendous impact around the country and giving dozens of military veterans a new mission post-service.

We are military veterans from all walks of life, and every part of the political spectrum, banding together to make politics less toxic and our Republic more representative through fully open, nonpartisan, public elections. Simply put, we are fighting to #LetAllVotersVote in every single public election.

Please consider going beyond “thank you” this Veterans Day, and join or support the independent reform movement that we are building. Onward!


Read More

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Man Who Keeps His Word — Even When He’s Joking

U.S. President Donald Trump tours the Ford River Rouge Complex on January 13, 2026 in Dearborn, Michigan.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

A Man Who Keeps His Word — Even When He’s Joking

We’ve learned why it’s a mistake to treat Trump’s outrageous lines as “just talk”

“We shouldn’t need a mid-term election” is his latest outrageous statement or joke. Let’s break down the pattern.

When a candidate says something extreme, we, the public, tend to downgrade it: He’s joking. He’s riffing. He’s trolling the press. We treat the line like entertainment, not intent.

Keep ReadingShow less