Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

America’s youth shows how to defend freedom

America’s youth shows how to defend freedom

Students walked out of area schools to gather at the Tennessee State Capitol building in protest to demand action for gun reform laws in the state on April 3, 2023 in Nashville, Tennessee.

Photo by Seth Herald/Getty Images

Aftergut is a former federal prosecutor and Chief Assistant City Attorney in San Francisco who writes on national affairs. He has argued and won cases in the Supreme Court of the United States and of California.

Neither youth nor the vote is wasted on the young. Events this month from Tennessee to Wisconsin to Pennsylvania have proven that young people will fight for their freedoms and rights, including the right to be safe.


As Republican state legislatures respond with youth-vote suppression laws, there are pathways open to citizens seeking to ensure a democratic future for Generation Z. More on that in a moment.

First, let’s look at their recent activism. This month, the threat of being shot in school launched student walk-outs and a protest for gun safety inside the statehouse in Tennessee. Those actions followed the shooting deaths of three children and three adults at Nashville’s Covenant School on March 27.

The students’ protest prompted a virtuous cycle: Three Democratic legislators joined the demonstrators; the Republican House majority reacted by expelling the two legislators who were black; then, with the whole world watching, a week later, the Tennessee Assembly’s majority backpedaled in humiliation and accepted the two expelled members’ reinstatement.

Republican Governor Bill Lee reversed course and signed an executive order aimed at strengthening background checks for gun buyers. Reinstated legislator Justin Jones poetically pronounced that “truth crushed to the ground will rise again.”

Then there’s Wisconsin. On April 4, the threat to women’s reproductive freedom drove young people to the polls in unprecedented numbers to vote for Janet Protasciewicz, the pro-choice candidate. Her election secured a 4-3 majority in favor of abortion rights.

The college student vote "was unlike anything that's ever been seen in a spring election,” according to Teddy Landis, an organizer for Project 72 WI, whose mission is to turn out young voters. The Washington Post reported about an illustrative county, Eau Claire, where the highest turnout was in the ward where the upper campus of the University of Wisconsin at Eau Claire resides. Protasciewicz received 87 percent of the vote in that ward.

A day before in Pennsylvania, more than 150 high school students walked out of their classes in College Park, [h]olding signs reading ‘Stop Banning Books,’ [and] ‘Books Aren’t Obscene, Censorship Is.’ They were protesting a policy the Perkiomen Valley School Board was considering that targets “sexualized content” in library books, a right wing talking point meant to appeal to parents.

Book-banning would seem an uncomfortable fit with the School District’s Mission Statement: “We cultivate an inclusive community of learners, empowered to grow intellectually, socially, emotionally.”

To borrow from Newton’s third law, for every hypocritical adult action, these kids have an equal and principled youth reaction.

As Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Will Bunch wrote, “America’s young people — the ones who left their classrooms last week . . . in Nashville to plead for real action against gun violence, the ones fighting book bans in their schools and speaking out for radical action on climate — are the bravest and boldest generation this nation has seen in some time.”

Trump strategists like KellyAnne Conway have taken note: “I’m really concerned . . . that the left becomes a turnout machine with young people.”

The GOP’s current pro-gun, anti-abortion, pro-censorship course will never attract college students, so in Ohio and Idaho, they have adopted laws intended to suppress their vote. Similar legislation is pending in at least 11 other states, including Florida.

The effort is organized. As The Guardian reports, the conservative Heritage Foundation and its political arm “have spent tens of millions of dollars promoting their own model bills that impose strict restrictions on voting.”

Citizens mobilizing is the antidote to such antidemocratic measures, and we’ve seen it from young people demonstrating in Tennessee and Pennsylvania and voting in Wisconsin. Efforts to lay the groundwork for more pro-democracy action on the ground are already underway.

This month, the nonpartisan organizations the Civics Center and Open Democracy “held a training to teach students and school staff how to organize a voter registration drive ” in New Hampshire. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has founded a national organization called “Democracy Summer” which “teaches high school and college students state-of-the-art tactics in voter registration and political organizing.”

Many say that we, the elder generation, have squandered our democratic heritage. While our national norms and traditional beliefs about government are surely under challenge, those working hard to preserve democracy understand that you can’t wring your hands and roll up your sleeves at the same time.

For all citizens who care about passing the torch of rights we were handed participation in and support for nonpartisan efforts like those of Project 72WI, the Civics Center, or Open Democracy are surely welcome. We can back Gen-Z in helping to ensure that our freedoms have not been wasted on us and are there for those taking the reins of America’s future.

Read More

news app
New platforms help overcome biased news reporting
Tero Vesalainen/Getty Images

The Selective Sanctity of Death: When Empathy Depends on Skin Color

Rampant calls to avoid sharing the video of Charlie Kirk’s death have been swift and emphatic across social media. “We need to keep our souls clean,” journalists plead. “Where are social media’s content moderators?” “How did we get so desensitized?” The moral outrage is palpable; the demands for human dignity urgent and clear.

But as a Black woman who has been forced to witness the constant virality of Black death, I must ask: where was this widespread anger for George Floyd? For Philando Castile? For Daunte Wright? For Tyre Nichols?

Keep ReadingShow less
Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less