Originally published by The 19th.
More women are increasingly disengaging with politics even as they see the stakes rising, according to a new poll from the Women & Politics Institute at American University and the Barbara Lee Family Foundation.
Forty-one percent of women say they’re more tuned out from politics — a 12-point increase compared to polling conducted last year. The figure was higher for women of color (49 percent) and women under 40 (55 percent).
That’s despite 3 in 5 women saying the upcoming midterm elections in November will be more important than most.
“Women have a bandwidth issue. And they may be deeply concerned about the election, but they’re also just trying to stay on track at their jobs and make sure that their kids do their homework and all of those other responsibilities that even in the most progressive families, it usually turns out to be the woman that worries about those details,” said Amanda Hunter, executive director of the Barbara Lee Family Foundation. “And that was all amplified during COVID.”
The survey shows more women are worried about their finances and the economy as a whole. And nearly half of women feel more burned out and lonely since the pandemic began.
Benenson Strategy Group conducted the survey, which included 801 online interviews between February 10-15 among women who were likely to vote in 2022. Forty-three percent of the respondents identified as Democrats; 33 percent identified as Republicans and 24 percent identified as independents. The margin of error is 3.5 percent.
Lindsay Vermeyen, senior vice president at Benenson, said the level of political disengagement among parents of young children is significant: 56 percent of parents with children under 5 years old.
“It’s probably not new news that parents are burned out,” she said. “But this just really reinforces that parents, especially of kids who haven’t been able to get vaccinated, are really feeling left behind.”
The findings around the economy also stood out to Vermeyen: Half of the women interviewed said their financial situation had worsened since the start of the pandemic, an 11-point increase compared to last year.
“We are seeing that women are feeling less and less like they can continue to do it all,” she said.
The survey data previews American women’s concerns ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. When asked about what they considered the most important issues in deciding who to vote for, 36 percent listed the economy, a similar figure to polling data released last year. But inflation and health care tied for third at 26 percent. (The pandemic was second at 27 percent.)
The survey also shows women continue to widely support improvements to the country’s health care systems. More than 80 percent of women continue to believe the pandemic has exposed more flaws in America’s health care system and that it needs to be improved. That includes support for programs like Medicaid, Medicare and the Affordable Care Act and policies like paid sick leave and paid family leave. That support has increased among Republican women, from 62 percent last year to 73 percent this year.
“Women have always been — at least for the past several decades — the source of speculation as voters, because women are known to be a powerful force at the ballot box,” said Amanda Hunter, executive director of the Barbara Lee Family Foundation. “And of course, women are not monolithic in the way that they vote. But this data sheds some light on what issues are going to be important to women.”
The survey also shows 40 percent of women are starting to think life will never go back to “normal” — a 14 point increase from 2021. Hunter called the data point “striking.”
“Women are really sounding the alarm about a lot of cracks in our systems that throughout the pandemic have come to the forefront,” she said. “After two years, this data really reveals the burdens that so many women have been shouldering in so many different categories.”
The survey also shows women are galvanized by seeing more women serving in public office. While 53 percent of women believe that elected officials, regardless of gender, have let people down and not delivered results, 54 percent also said the record number of women in Congress has had a “positive impact on women’s lives across the country.” Three in 4 Democrats and more than half of Independents want to see more women in office. (More than half Republican women respondents thought there was just the right amount of women in elected office.)
Beyond elections, the survey also showed that 7 in 10 women thought President Joe Biden should uphold a commitment to nominate a Black woman to the U.S. Supreme Court. The polling was conducted before Biden announced he would nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the high court.
Hunter noted that the foundation often talks about breaking the “imagination barrier” that exists when there’s a position that has been dominated by men for many years.
“When a woman breaks through into a position, it really opens up a new vision of what’s possible for other women and girls across the country — regardless of if they have an interest in maybe being a Supreme Court justice some day. It just shows a different level of possibility and serves as an inspiration,” she said.




















Eric Trump, the newly appointed ALT5 board director of World Liberty Financial, walks outside of the NASDAQ in Times Square as they mark the $1.5- billion partnership between World Liberty Financial and ALT5 Sigma with the ringing of the NASDAQ opening bell, on Aug. 13, 2025, in New York City.
Why does the Trump family always get a pass?
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche joined ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday to defend or explain a lot of controversies for the Trump administration: the Epstein files release, the events in Minneapolis, etc. He was also asked about possible conflicts of interest between President Trump’s family business and his job. Specifically, Blanche was asked about a very sketchy deal Trump’s son Eric signed with the UAE’s national security adviser, Sheikh Tahnoon.
Shortly before Trump was inaugurated in early 2025, Tahnoon invested $500 million in the Trump-owned World Liberty, a then newly launched cryptocurrency outfit. A few months later, UAE was granted permission to purchase sensitive American AI chips. According to the Wall Street Journal, which broke the story, “the deal marks something unprecedented in American politics: a foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming U.S. president’s company.”
“How do you respond to those who say this is a serious conflict of interest?” ABC host George Stephanopoulos asked.
“I love it when these papers talk about something being unprecedented or never happening before,” Blanche replied, “as if the Biden family and the Biden administration didn’t do exactly the same thing, and they were just in office.”
Blanche went on to boast about how the president is utterly transparent regarding his questionable business practices: “I don’t have a comment on it beyond Trump has been completely transparent when his family travels for business reasons. They don’t do so in secret. We don’t learn about it when we find a laptop a few years later. We learn about it when it’s happening.”
Sadly, Stephanopoulos didn’t offer the obvious response, which may have gone something like this: “OK, but the president and countless leading Republicans insisted that President Biden was the head of what they dubbed ‘the Biden Crime family’ and insisted his business dealings were corrupt, and indeed that his corruption merited impeachment. So how is being ‘transparent’ about similar corruption a defense?”
Now, I should be clear that I do think the Biden family’s business dealings were corrupt, whether or not laws were broken. Others disagree. I also think Trump’s business dealings appear to be worse in many ways than even what Biden was alleged to have done. But none of that is relevant. The standard set by Trump and Republicans is the relevant political standard, and by the deputy attorney general’s own account, the Trump administration is doing “exactly the same thing,” just more openly.
Since when is being more transparent about wrongdoing a defense? Try telling a cop or judge, “Yes, I robbed that bank. I’ve been completely transparent about that. So, what’s the big deal?”
This is just a small example of the broader dysfunction in the way we talk about politics.
Americans have a special hatred for hypocrisy. I think it goes back to the founding era. As Alexis de Tocqueville observed in “Democracy In America,” the old world had a different way of dealing with the moral shortcomings of leaders. Rank had its privileges. Nobles, never mind kings, were entitled to behave in ways that were forbidden to the little people.
In America, titles of nobility were banned in the Constitution and in our democratic culture. In a society built on notions of equality (the obvious exceptions of Black people, women, Native Americans notwithstanding) no one has access to special carve-outs or exemptions as to what is right and wrong. Claiming them, particularly in secret, feels like a betrayal against the whole idea of equality.
The problem in the modern era is that elites — of all ideological stripes — have violated that bargain. The result isn’t that we’ve abandoned any notion of right and wrong. Instead, by elevating hypocrisy to the greatest of sins, we end up weaponizing the principles, using them as a cudgel against the other side but not against our own.
Pick an issue: violent rhetoric by politicians, sexual misconduct, corruption and so on. With every revelation, almost immediately the debate becomes a riot of whataboutism. Team A says that Team B has no right to criticize because they did the same thing. Team B points out that Team A has switched positions. Everyone has a point. And everyone is missing the point.
Sure, hypocrisy is a moral failing, and partisan inconsistency is an intellectual one. But neither changes the objective facts. This is something you’re supposed to learn as a child: It doesn’t matter what everyone else is doing or saying, wrong is wrong. It’s also something lawyers like Mr. Blanche are supposed to know. Telling a judge that the hypocrisy of the prosecutor — or your client’s transparency — means your client did nothing wrong would earn you nothing but a laugh.
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.