• Home
  • Opinion
  • Quizzes
  • Redistricting
  • Sections
  • About Us
  • Voting
  • Events
  • Civic Ed
  • Campaign Finance
  • Directory
  • Election Dissection
  • Fact Check
  • Glossary
  • Independent Voter News
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Subscriptions
  • Log in
Leveraging Our Differences
  • news & opinion
    • Big Picture
      • Civic Ed
      • Ethics
      • Leadership
      • Leveraging big ideas
      • Media
    • Business & Democracy
      • Corporate Responsibility
      • Impact Investment
      • Innovation & Incubation
      • Small Businesses
      • Stakeholder Capitalism
    • Elections
      • Campaign Finance
      • Independent Voter News
      • Redistricting
      • Voting
    • Government
      • Balance of Power
      • Budgeting
      • Congress
      • Judicial
      • Local
      • State
      • White House
    • Justice
      • Accountability
      • Anti-corruption
      • Budget equity
    • Columns
      • Beyond Right and Left
      • Civic Soul
      • Congress at a Crossroads
      • Cross-Partisan Visions
      • Democracy Pie
      • Our Freedom
  • Pop Culture
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
  • events
  • About
      • Mission
      • Advisory Board
      • Staff
      • Contact Us
Sign Up
  1. Home>
  2. Big Picture>
  3. afghanistan>

Afghanistan, a false binary

David L. Nevins
Debilyn Molineaux
https://twitter.com/davidlnevins?lang=en
August 18, 2021
Displaced Afghans

Displaced Afghans from the northern provinces rest after they arrive at a makeshift camp near Kabul on Aug. 10.

Paula Bronstein/Getty Images
Molineaux is president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, and Nevins is its co-founder and board chairman. They are co-publishers of The Fulcrum.

The horrific scenes we have watched the past few days from Afghanistan are unbearable to watch. How did we get here? And what can we learn?

As we watch the unraveling of 20 years of work, hopes and dreams, what options do we have to help? For veterans or active duty service people or peacebuilders, it is especially difficult as they measure what they see against the sacrifices they have made. For regular Americans who wanted us out of Afghanistan, there are still mixed emotions.

Yet here we are, safe and sound in our homes, and as so often happens our national leaders move from empathy and caring to the political game of taking advantage of a situation; the blame game starts. In Afghanistan, there is enough blame to go around.

Along with the blame game is the usual oversimplification of an incredibly complex situation. That is what we do as Americans. We oversimplify. Our leaders reduce complex situations into easy-to-grasp catchy soundbites with binary choices that do nothing to solve the problem. Nothing.

On Monday, President Biden said: "I stand squarely behind my decision. After 20 years, I've learned the hard way that there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces." He admitted that his administration miscalculated and took responsibility by saying "the buck stops with me." Yet this will do little to change the nature of the ensuing political battle.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

And who can blame the Republicans from taking advantage of the situation to paint Biden as weak and ill prepared when we all know that the Democrats are just as quick to take advantage of strategic errors by past and future Republican presidents.

This is the way our system works. Or doesn't work.

But a problem like Afghanistan is not black or white, good or bad, smart or dumb. Our nation's 20-year history in Afghanistan is complex, nuanced and contradictory. And how much easier is it for each of us individually and for us as a nation to turn to our conditioned use of binary choice-making. No critical thinking required. No questioning of the choices offered.

"The dualistic mind pulls everything down into some kind of tit-for-tat system of false choices and too-simple contraries," says Fr. Richard Rohr of the Center for Action and Contemplation.

The world we live in is more complex than ever. In the midst of multiple existential crises, we need to change the manner in which we solve problems and face the future. We need to handle complexity differently; not by dumbing down to binary choices, but by expanding our ability to think in nuance and accept paradoxes. We must have a holistic approach that investigates all factors that could lead to multiple outcomes; to see systems and to connect with others. To restore our humanity, we must wean ourselves of simplistic binary choices and avoid the blame game.

Ask yourself what are your choices to help the Afghan people? With whom do you have influence? While we are dealing with feelings of guilt, loss, shame, et al., people in Afghanistan are trying to survive. Our immediate focus should be on helping people, not devolving into the blame game of binary thinking.

As the Afghanistan crisis fades (and they all -- including Vietnam, Rwanda, Sudan, Yugoslavia et al -- fade with time), what are the lessons we learned? How can we respond differently next time?

What is the role of the United States in the world? If China were to take over Taiwan or Russia were to invade another country in the former Soviet bloc, what would we do? What are the national interests that will guide us in an increasingly hostile political world? How might we be better prepared to address the complexity of situations involving the U.S., inside the boundaries of other nations?

As civilians, we will not know the extent of the complexity the military and diplomatic corps are facing. We do not know the delicate negotiations that have taken place. The blame game further erodes our trust that the professionals are doing their job, the best they know how. The media is exacerbating our outrage and fear by feeding us images of suffering.

For average citizens there is nothing for us to do as individuals beyond expect more from our leaders. Our leaders must not demonize their political opponents at this moment. Bold leaders will grab this opportunity to take political risks and develop long-term solutions. This in turn will help define the United States' responsibility in the world for generations to come

We as citizens deserve better than tit-for-tat politics.

afghanistan

Want to write
for The Fulcrum?

If you have something to say about ways to protect or repair our American democracy, we want to hear from you.

Submit
Get some Leverage Sign up for The Fulcrum Newsletter
Follow
Contributors

Reform in 2023: Leadership worth celebrating

Layla Zaidane

Two technology balancing acts

Dave Anderson

Reform in 2023: It’s time for the civil rights community to embrace independent voters

Jeremy Gruber

Congress’ fix to presidential votes lights the way for broader election reform

Kevin Johnson

Democrats and Republicans want the status quo, but we need to move Forward

Christine Todd Whitman

Reform in 2023: Building a beacon of hope in Boston

Henry Santana
Jerren Chang
latest News

Reframing judicial elections — not “who should we elect,” but “why should we elect them at all?”

Alexander Vanderklipp
7h

Seven Days in March

Lawrence Goldstone
7h

Video: Modernizing Congress: The business case to upgrade government

Our Staff
9h

Something is horribly, horribly wrong

Debilyn Molineaux
15 March

Virtue’s place in our politics

Kevin Frazier
15 March

D.C. voter suppression by the Federal Government

David Butler
14 March
Videos

Video: What would happen if Trump was a third-party candidate in 2024?

Our Staff

Video: How the Federal Reserve is the shadow branch of the government

Our Staff

Video: 2023 National Week of Conversation

Our Staff

Video: Bipartisan lunch with lawmakers: Making elections work better in PA

Our Staff

Video: Antisemitism and its impacts

Our Staff

Video: We the people’s forum - Social media and the First Amendment

Our Staff
Podcasts

Podcast: A tricky dance

Our Staff
14 March

Podcast: Kevin, Tucker and wokism, oh my!

Debilyn Molineaux
David Riordan
13 March

Podcast: Civic learning amid the culture wars

Our Staff
13 March

Podcast: Winning legislative majorities

Our Staff
09 March
Recommended
Reframing judicial elections — not “who should we elect,” but “why should we elect them at all?”

Reframing judicial elections — not “who should we elect,” but “why should we elect them at all?”

Judicial
Seven Days in March

Seven Days in March

Threats to democracy
Video: Modernizing Congress: The business case to upgrade government

Video: Modernizing Congress: The business case to upgrade government

Congress
Something is horribly, horribly wrong

Something is horribly, horribly wrong

Big Picture
Virtue’s place in our politics

Virtue’s place in our politics

Big Picture
Video: What would happen if Trump was a third-party candidate in 2024?

Video: What would happen if Trump was a third-party candidate in 2024?