Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What three African nations can teach us about holding a legitimate election

Democratic Republic of Congo President

Félix Tshisekedi (above), who replaced Joseph Kabila as president of the Democratic Republic of Congo, "shows how a strongman can be outmaneuvered by a combination of internal and external pressure," writes Leach.

Michele Tantussi/Getty Images

Leach works for SHL & Associates, a Texas consulting firm, and is a fellow at the Truman National Security Project, a progressive defense and foreign policy think tank. He has a doctorate in international relations, focused on Africa, from London Metropolitan University.


Back in 2015, Trevor Noah questioned whether Donald Trump would be America's first African president — noting on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" how the Republican presidential candidate's rhetoric, style and xenophobia resembled those of many African despots.

Trump is now president, of course, and seeking a second term by actively using his power to disenfranchise voters and publicly muse about ignoring the results of the coming election. At the same time, though, it's the leaders in three African nations — the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa and Malawi — setting examples for how the United States can recover and restore our own democracy.

When Félix Tshisekedi became president of the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2018, some worried he was placed there by outgoing President Joseph Kabila and would serve as a political puppet, particularly since it appeared that a different opposition candidate won the election. But Tshisekedi has proved resilient to Kabila's coalition, which dominates the National Assembly, including a successful negotiation to select a prime minister acceptable to both parties.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Tshisekedi has released political prisoners and chipped away at corruption within the government, a gargantuan task after more than two decades of Kabila-family rule. Critically, the African Union named him as its first vice chairman this year and designated him chairman for next year. This external validation indicated Tshisekedi enjoyed broad regional and continental support, an implicit warning to Kabila to tread lightly.

Tshisekedi shows how a strongman can be outmaneuvered by a combination of internal and external pressure. Kabila's exit was made possible only by years of diplomacy and popular demand for change. And just as the African Union delicately nudged the contested 2018 election in the right direction, our allies should be prepared to encourage the United States to insist on a free, fair and transparent election in November.

Some have warned of ballot counting interference by Attorney General William Barr and other underhanded disruptions of our contest, so it is suddenly within the realm of possibility that the United States will need external allies tactfully moving in tandem with domestic action to shore up the legitimacy of an election resulting in a President-elect Joe Biden.

In South Africa, after a decade of corruption by President Jacob Zuma, a convention of the governing African National Congress replaced him with Cyril Ramaphosa as party leader and president of the country. Ramaphosa was re-elected president last year on his reputation as a technocratic businessman and negotiator. Zuma's adherents maintain significant influence within the party, and Ramaphosa has not been able to pursue the reforms or excise corruption in the manner he hoped. But his accomplishments are remarkable and have put the state above party in every regard.

Ramaphosa's ANC may signal the future Republican Party of the United States. Trumpism will surely not end if Trump loses, but the GOP can tactfully begin marginalizing the remnants of Trumpism now and find a Ramaphosa-like figure — someone who can lead the party away from the impulses of further self-destruction and authoritarianism and back to democratic norms and values.

Malawi offers an example of the judiciary taking charge in countering election fraud. In February, the country's High Court concluded the Malawian Electoral Commission failed to conduct a free and fair election in 2019, vacated the presidency and ordered a new election. Despite the pandemic, Malawi conducted a new and credible election in May and the opposition candidate won, a direct result of the country's strong and independent judiciary.

It is very possible our Supreme Court will play a pivotal role leading up to or following the November election; the justices, and plenty of other federal and state courts, have already been very active hearing election law disputes.

Even in this polarized era, the Supreme Court is viewed by the majority of the public as an independent arbiter. More Americans approve of the court today than any time in the past 10 years. This perspective may change, as courts at all levels are petitioned by the Republican Party and the Trump team to limit participation in the election. But Malawi provides a strong example of how, in a moment when democracy itself hangs in the balance, an independent judiciary can secure the other two branches of government from democratic failure.

Analogies aren't perfect. But as Trump and his supporters in the administration work to undermine the legitimacy of the election and attack fundamental democratic norms, these three African nations offer instructive insights for meeting the challenges. As we work to defend and preserve government by and for the people in the face of unprecedented attack from within, we would do well to look to democracies around the world for ways to strengthen our own.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less