Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Electoral College must be held to the highest standards

Donald Trump and Mike Pence

Supporters of Donald Trump wanted Mike Pence to throw out lawfully named electors and swing the 2020 election.

Aurora Samperio/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Schmidt is a syndicated columnist and editorial board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Thought leaders have long understood that honor and integrity are imperative when choosing the leader of an idealistic society. America’s Founding Fathers understood this as well and therefore established the Electoral College, making electors a set of guardians within a system that would more times than not select the best person to be president. The Founders also thought these electors should be of upright character as well.


Much of what we learned about how the Founding Fathers decided to set up the government of the new American experiment came from the Federalist Papers. The 85 essays that make up the Federalist Papers were written under the pseudonym “Publius,” the pen name for Alexander Hamilton (the first secretary of the Treasury), James Madison (the fourth president and John Jay (the first chief justice).

Federalist 68 described the Electoral College and noted the way a president is elected, “if not perfect, it is at least excellent.” Electors are chosen by each state, and then they assemble and vote in their state. This was designed to promote a “detached and divided situation that will expose them much less to heats and ferments.” The electors, or immediate agents in the election, as Hamilton called them, “will at least enter the task free from any sinister bias.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Hamilton wrote that the Electoral College process affords moral certainty and “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The Founders thought the Electoral College would produce “a constant probability of seeing the station filled with characters preeminent for ability and virtue.”

Approximately 234 years later, a fraudulent plot was underway in order to obstruct the certification of Joe Biden’s victory and undermine the very process our Founders envisioned. While Special Counsel Jack Smith is still conducting his investigation, the American public has learned some of the details of the fake electors plan.

Seven states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – that Donald Trump lost in 2020 were found to have slates of fake GOP electors who falsely claimed Trump had won their electoral votes. The plan, which was based on a flawed legal theory, called for Vice President Mike Pence to swap official electors with an alternate slate during the certification process, thus changing the outcome of the Electoral College vote and the overall winner of the presidential race.

Testimony has revealed that Trump was fully aware of the fake electors plan. CNN recently reported that two days before the Jan. 6 insurrection, the Trump campaign realized that the fake elector certificates from two critical battleground states (Michigan and Wisconsin) were stuck in the mail. Trump campaign operatives scrambled to fly copies of the phony certificates to Washington, D.C., to try to get the documents to Pence while he presided over the Electoral College certification. According to emails and recordings obtained by CNN, “The operatives even considered chartering a jet to ensure the files reached Washington, DC, in time for the Jan. 6, 2021, proceeding.”

There are investigations in each of the seven states and some fake electors have already been charged.

The Founding Fathers hoped the Electoral College would add an additional layer of protection to avoid corruption in the choosing of a worthy leader as they worried that a faction of partisans might conspire to control an election. In the case of Donald Trump and the 2020 election, their worst fears came true.

At the end of 2022, Congress passed and Biden signed an omnibus appropriations bill that included the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act. This welcome improvement to the ambiguous Electoral Count Act of 1887 strengthens the institution of the Electoral College. But unless we as a society can reestablish the norms laid out by the Founders, the events of Jan. 6 can and most likely will occur again. It is imperative that we go back to the foundations of our founding, reduce partisan factionalism and start holding our electors to the highest standards.

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump

Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

Scholars unmask Trump election lawyers’ use of falsified evidence

Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

After 2022’s midterm election, I had an email exchange with Robert Beadles, a combative northern Nevada businessman and Donald Trump devotee. His post-2020 hounding of Reno’s top election official had pushed her to resign. Beadles didn’t trust the midterm results either and offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who’d prove that it was not stolen.

Easy money, right? Beadles’ distrust was tribal. But his reward hinged on refuting a statistical analysis that he waved like the flag. His statistician, Edward Solomon, who lived halfway across the country, found mathematical aberrations in the results that he didn’t like. The men claimed that was proof enough that the announced election results were dishonest.

I, and several experienced analysts — a math PhD, a computer scientist, and an election auditor who had spent years studying election systems, voting data, and procedures — tried to explain why the statistics, alone, did not prove anything. We politely told him what records to obtain, why they mattered, what methodologies to use. Beadles didn’t care and soon lashed out.

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less