Gov. Josh Shapiro, D-Pa., joined Morning Joe to discuss the start of his time in office and appointing Republican Al Schmidt as Secretary of the Commonwealth.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Join a growing community committed to civic renewal.
Subscribe to The Fulcrum and be part of the conversation.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More

Luna Rosado, a single mom of three in Connecticut, said she is paying about $40 more a week on gas, cutting into her budget for groceries and other essentials.
Courtesy of Luna Rosado; Emily Scherer for The 19th
‘I Can’t Keep Up’: Many Single Moms Were Struggling To Get By. Then Gas Prices Shot Up.
Apr 09, 2026
The rise in gas prices happened so quickly, single mom Luna Rosado has barely had time to adjust.
Rosado fills her tank twice a week to commute to her two health care jobs and shuttle her three kids to school, basketball and soccer practice.
This month, as costs have risen 30 percent after the start of war in Iran, she’s been paying about $40 more a week on gas. That’s $160 less a month for groceries and everything else they need. Rosado has since had to calculate and recalculate her budget, seeing where she can find the room to absorb the changes.
“It felt almost impossible in the beginning because I didn’t know how to approach the situation. Everything’s just getting more expensive,” said Rosado, who lives with her three kids, ages 11, 9 and 7, in Plainville, Connecticut. “I’m like, ‘I can’t keep up.’”
The impact of gas prices is so broad it could sway the midterm elections. After the United States and Israel attacked Iran at the end of February, leading Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz and cut off a quarter of the world’s oil supply, single moms are one group that feels it all the more acutely as they balance rising costs on one income.
Chastity Lord, the president and CEO of the Jeremiah Program, which works with low-income single mothers, hears stories like Rosado’s nearly daily, she said — the single mom and teacher who is crashing on a friend’s couch to save on gas, or the single moms who are gig workers cutting back their Uber or DoorDash driving hours.
As of this week, the average price of a regular, unleaded gallon of gas is just over $3.97 — more than $1 higher than what it was a month ago, according to AAA. In some states, like New Mexico, prices are up as much as 40 percent, according to a New York Times analysis of data from GasBuddy, a gas price finder app.
“Gas cuts through everything,” Lord said. As a single mom, “you’re already underwater, and it’s almost like the gas puts weights on your feet.”
More than 4 in 5 single parents are women, and the majority of those are Black women and Latinas. Their median income is also about $17,000 less than single fathers. And though single moms work at higher rates than married mothers, they are also more likely to be paying more to fuel their commute — and spending a larger share of their income at the pump.
The families spending the highest percentage of their income on gas — about 4.3 percent — are those earning $40,000 to $49,999 a year, according to consumer expenditure data from 2024. That’s the exact bracket where many single moms are concentrated; the median income for single mothers working full-time is about $40,000.
Single moms “are going to be the first ones to feel any economic problem going on,” said Sara Estep, an economist with the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank.
“Because there is only one person earning money for the family, that creates a lot of sensitivity to these prices. There is very little room left to pivot at that point,” she said.
Low-income people, Lord said, are also rarely filling up their tanks the whole way, but rather putting in what they can as they go. They have increased visibility into the price jumps because they’re watching them closely day to day. “This is something that is poking you daily as you go put the gas in your car,” she said.
It becomes about tradeoffs — what can you live without? For moms, it means cutting back on going out with their kids to just focus on the basics.
Rosado, the mom in Connecticut, has started shopping at cheaper grocery stores and stopped driving for Uber and Lyft on the weekends because the increased gas prices would cut into her profits too much to make the time worth her while. That means losing supplemental money that was helping pay for her phone bill, child care and groceries.
“I’m a strong person so I roll with the punches, but I’ve had sleepless nights because of this — insomnia,” Rosado said. “It shouldn’t feel this way but it does.”
As a single mom of three teenagers, Heidi Dragneff has felt that weight much of this year. Dragneff said it now costs $60 to fill up her tank, by her calculation an increase of about 80 cents per gallon over the past two weeks, and she’s “terrified of what it’s going to look like” every time she goes to the pump. Her car recently broke down, too, so she’s debating the repair costs and the possibility of having to buy a new vehicle altogether.
I end up trying to make lists of budgets, like, where is all of my money going?”
Heidi Dragneff
On top of that, Dragneff’s rent increased $600 a month last year, her energy bills doubled this month and soon she’s going to lose child support in June for her eldest daughter who just turned 18, which means a cut of $400 a month. Moving is out of the question because she doesn’t have enough in savings to cover first and last months’ rent and security deposits. Recently, she stopped contributing to her 401K to cut back.
“I end up trying to make lists of budgets, like, where is all of my money going? How is it disappearing so quickly? And you go over these numbers over and over and over again, and nothing changes,” said Dragneff, who is a Navy veteran now doing organizing work for other veterans in Virginia Beach.
Single moms, she said, have to figure it out alone.
“From the outside it looks like we are these super strong women that have it all together when we are struggling just as much as anybody else, if not more,” she said. “Our kids are looking to us. It’s our responsibility, [on] our shoulders, to not lose our job, to make sure that we are able to make ends meet, keep the lights on and pay the rent.”
What’s also been challenging over the past few years, single moms told The 19th, is the unpredictability of where the price changes are occuring. A few years ago, the story was all about rising grocery prices. Now it’s gas, too.
“We don’t even know what’s going to happen day to day just watching the news,” said Taylour Grant, a single mom of four — ages 2, 7, 9 and 14 — in Tampa, Florida.

Taylour Grant, a single mom of four in Tampa, Florida, said recent cuts to her food stamps have left her with less wiggle room as gas prices climb. (Courtesy of Taylour Grant)
Grant’s food stamps were cut by nearly $200 a month recently after changes to the eligibility requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program went into effect in Florida last month. That means she has even less wiggle room to cut back on other things, like groceries, as gas prices climb.
She blamed the Trump administration for the instability.
“They don’t have the everyday worries that we have. They don’t have to worry about feeding their kids. They don’t have to worry about getting gas,” Grant said. “I’m pretty sure they don’t know how much a gallon of milk costs, so it’s just them not being mindful of us down here.”
With the midterm elections approaching in November, Democrats and Republican strategists have agreed that affordability will top the list of voter concerns this cycle. It’s a topic that has been highly motivational for mothers, who are often the ones managing household purchases and budgets. Women, more than men, report more concern about paying their bills in every area, according to a 19th News/SurveyMonkey poll taken in September.
Sondra Goldschein, the executive director of the Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy, which backs candidates that support issues like paid parental leave and affordable child care, is knocking on doors this election cycle talking to mothers about cost of living issues. In the organization’s conversations with voters, Goldschein said, they “are seeing people really step forward to voice their strong concerns and looking for various outlets to help make changes, whether it’s who they’re going to vote for or whether they’re going to run for office themselves.”
Samantha Shepherd, a child care director in Savannah, Georgia, and a single mom of two girls, said rising gas prices are affecting families at her center, including one mother who may not be able to take her children to school. (Courtesy of Samantha Shepherd)
The Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy PAC this year is supporting Democrats in Senate races in North Carolina, Georgia, Michigan, Maine and Ohio and in House races in Iowa and Pennsylvania.
Lord is also hearing that the affordability crisis is mobilizing moms. At an early March conference of 600 single mothers, Lord said there was one session that was absolutely packed: “Why Women Don’t Run & Why They Should.”
“Moms are interested in being involved in campaigns, doing door knocking … There’s a deep desire to be involved in reimagining what’s possible for themselves, their family, but also their community,” Lord said. “Yes, there’s incredible stress, there’s incredible fatigue, alarm, vulnerability, but … people are like, ‘What do I need to do? Who do I need to hold accountable? What role do I play in changing what is happening in my local community?’”
“It is political,” said Samantha Shepherd, a child care director in Savannah, Georgia, and a single mom of two girls ages 6 and 7. Recently, one single mother whose children attend her center said she might not be able to take the kids to school because of the gas prices.
“We’re suffering for the drastic decisions that are being made by those who sit in the White House or those who are our legislators,” she said. “It’s important that people understand their voices need to be heard as well. Collectively, we can make a lasting sound, but if we don’t make no noise about it, they’re not even going to hear us.”
‘I Can’t Keep Up’: Many Single Moms Were Struggling To Get By. Then Gas Prices Shot Up. was originally published by the 19th and is republished with permission.
Chabeli Carrazana is an economy and child care reporter for the 19th.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended

A 20-year education veteran examines the decline of student performance in America, highlighting the impact of screen time, overreliance on technology, weak fundamentals, and unequal school funding—and calls for urgent education reform.
Getty Images, StockPlanets
The Mind Is a Terrible Thing to Waste - What To Do
Apr 08, 2026
The motto of the United Negro College Fund can today be applied to all children in our school systems—not just the socially disadvantaged, or poor, or intellectually challenged, but all children regardless of SES characteristics or intelligence. I say this based on 20 years of working as a volunteer tutor or staff in elementary and middle schools in various parts of the country.
The problem has several components. The first is the pervasive negative impact on children's minds of their compulsive use of screens, social media, and the internet. There is no shortage of articles that have been written, both scientific and anecdotal, about the various aspects of this negative impact. Research shows that the compulsive use of screen devices leads to a variety of social interaction and psychological problems.
Then there is the use that is being made of computers in schools as a major part of the instruction program. From what I have seen, students spend more time on the laptop than receiving instruction from their teacher. While computers have a place in a learning program, I believe that too much reliance has been placed on them. Research adds credence to this feeling.
Parents don't seem to place the same emphasis on learning that they used to, and as a result, children are less committed to the process. As learning is not an easy process, and definitely often not "fun," this lack of commitment results in many students frequently tuning instruction out. (I found no research on this.)
Both ELA and math instruction are based on and depend on the mastering and understanding of fundamentals—for ELA, phonics; for math, the basic rules for adding and subtracting, and most importantly, the multiplication table. Yet time and again, I have found that students who have not mastered these fundamentals are moved forward regardless. Most schools today promote all students to the next grade, regardless of performance; I've been told that parents don't want their children held back.
Teachers are often blamed for the fact that the national scores of students' knowledge of English and Math have declined. But while there no doubt is some blame there, there is just so much a teacher can do when faced with children who don't care about education, who think learning is irrelevant for them, and who have minds that have a short attention span because of the impact of technology.
Another problem is that even with all the money the Federal government pours into our schools, there are still many children who are left behind because they don't receive the remedial instruction they need; teachers just don't have the time. I'm not talking so much about the children in Special Ed or Title 1 programs, I'm talking about the many children who don't qualify for these programs but just never learned the basics in elementary school, not because of a learning disability but because they just couldn't keep up, and so each year fall farther and farther behind as they are promoted to the next grade. This applies to both English and Math. Even if they learn some process in 5th or 6th grade, the basics—whether it's phonics or the multiplication tables—need to be applied, and if those were never mastered, the student is stuck.
But school districts uniformly do not spend the money to provide one-on-one remedial services to such children. Because they fall between the cracks of the various Federal programs, they are doomed to low functioning in life. In a country as rich as ours, this is disgraceful. No child should be left behind.
Finally, the way in which schools are funded in this country is a recipe for inequality. Local property taxes account for 45% of school funding; another 45% comes from the state, with the federal government contributing only 10%. Although states often apply equalization formulas, they usually don't work. As a result, children who grow up in areas that have a better tax base receive a better funded, and typically a better, education. Thus, poor children—both White and people of color—never receive the education that gives them the equal opportunity that is promised in the Declaration of Independence to pursue happiness.
The result of all these factors is that untold millions of minds are wasted. This is not just an unnecessary tragedy for the individuals so impacted, but it is a drag on our society and economy because these individuals will never be able to contribute to the economy as they otherwise would and their participation in society is limited.
Regarding the impact of technology on children's lives, after numerous studies around the world of the negative impact on children, there is movement to limit the use of smartphones and other technology by children under 16. Regarding the use of technology in the classroom, I am not aware of any movement to return to a system of greater teacher involvement. Regarding those that never master ELA or math, parent, teacher, and school organizations must lobby state and federal governments for funds to provided one-on-one remedial instruction for such children, initially whatever grade they're in; at some point, it should only be necessary in the elementary grades where those skills are taught.
But beyond such efforts, it is critical that parents emphasize the importance of learning to success and happiness in one's life. There is a reason why certain cultures, both in fact and stereotype, produce students who excel more in their education—Asian and Jewish come to mind immediately—it is that parents in these cultures, regardless of their social status, generally emphasize the importance of education, not just to get ahead for a better life.
All parents should be encouraged by whatever agencies or health providers they come in contact with to bring education into the home and emphasize its importance to their children. If a parent is not comfortable with that because of their own low-level of educational attainment, they need to be shown how they can do this simply but effectively.
This should be seen as a component part of the push for equal opportunity in our society. Everyone at all levels of society should be committed to this goal that has its roots in the words of the Declaration of Independence, that:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men."Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com
Keep ReadingShow less

A civil rights attorney reflects on being banned from Instagram, rising censorship, and her parents’ escape from Cuba—drawing chilling parallels between past authoritarian regimes and growing threats to free speech in America.
Getty Images, filo
Canceled and Silenced: From Instagram Ban to Fears of Censorship
Apr 08, 2026
I have often discussed my parents' fleeing Cuba, in part, for free speech.
The Washington Post just purged one third of their team, including reporters who are stationed in Ukraine and the middle east, reporting on critical international affairs.
A Washington Post reporter's home was raided by the FBI.
Don Lemon, a former CNN anchor, was arrested.
Instagram banned me - twice.
I became a feminist in the 90s (I was probably one sooner, but didn’t know the meaning). I was an immediate fan of Ms. Magazine, specifically the principle that the magazine had no advertisements because of the sexism, expectations, and pressure that women feel by looking at unrealistic images of models.
I immediately subscribed to the notion to try to do everything I can to stay away from advertising and from propaganda.
For the same reason I love Ms. Magazine; I hate social media. It is not real. It creates a semblance of perfection or pressure to keep up with standards that are not accurate or possible. It allows bullying. It causes depression in teens. It violates privacy and sells your data. The list goes on.
But social media can feel like a necessary evil. Most places I go, people connect over their Instagram accounts. Businesses advertise, and social action is taken on social media.
I created an Instagram account using my business email, hoping to highlight the work of my organization and to stay apprised of things that were happening for survivors across the country. A couple of weeks into having an account, never having posted, using a professional headshot and my professional email - I was banned.
I had to prove that I was real. I had to upload a picture of my driver’s license. I had to upload a copy of my passport. And when that still wasn’t enough, I had to record an image of me looking at the camera and looking to the left, to the right, up, and down. I remained banned. Silenced.
I went to an event later that week where a CEO of a migrant farm worker immigrant rights group told me that her account was banned. I felt like there was a connection there and wondered if we were being monitored and targeted.
I filed an appeal. Nothing. I emailed Instagram. Nothing. I ChatGPT’d “how do I file an appeal with Instagram.” Nothing.
My friend said, "What did you do?” Nothing--except follow groups pursuing survivors and social justice.
A few months later, I thought I would attempt again. I was feeling disconnected from not having access to Instagram. Using an email I had previously used for a now deactivated Facebook account, I created a new Instagram account.
I started following the protests of the national strike for January 30, and that same day, January 30, 2026, I got banned. I again uploaded a video of me turning my head to the left, to the right, up and down. I uploaded my driver’s license and my passport, and I was told I had violated community standards - permanently banned, again.
Silenced. I have never posted one thing. I once reposted something from my organization. I think my account lasted about a week.
Now I wonder: do I have free speech? I am not sure if I was banned because I lead a nonprofit, but outspoken leaders across the country are being silenced. Reporters are being arrested and attacked. Legal observers have been assassinated. First responders were assassinated. Nonprofit leaders silenced.
I can’t help but see a pattern.
My job as a lawyer is to advise people of their rights. We are proud at Survivor Justice Center to give “voice and choice.” We do not tell our clients what to do, but provide them with their legal options. This is a core tenent of being an attorney and a guiding principle to my beliefs.
As an attorney, I must give this advice: it is imperative we continue to speak out and exercise our right to free speech. We must not be complicit. We must continue to fight for those rights of others, even when our voices are silenced.
However, for the first time, I feel afraid to be on the streets exercising this right. I have asked my board for a plan if I am arrested. Was banning me on Instagram only the start? Am I now a target due to my job, my beliefs, or the fact that I’m a daughter of immigrants?
I encourage my staff to speak out against injustice; when my friends express hesitancy at attending rallies or gatherings, I remind them of their rights and encourage them to utilize them. But the recent silencing of critics has made me doubt my own advice. Should I encourage people to use their voice when I know the potential consequences?
My parents fled a communist dictatorship where their rights to free speech were stripped. I have a staff member who was born into a regime with a dictator in Chile; she recently remarked that what we are facing now feels like what she experienced and what her family fled.
The stories of my parents' escape from Cuba linger in my head; I’m reminded of their struggles when I see news of people being punished just for standing up for what they believe in. Even now, journalists in Cuba face harsh penalties for sharing the truth, often dismissed as “fake news” (sound familiar?).
The reality of my parents' past and my future are colliding, and it’s terrifying.
Carmen McDonald is an attorney who serves as executive director of the Survivor Justice Center; she is a former Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project and Blue Shield California.
Keep ReadingShow less
Immigration Crackdowns Are Breaking the Food System
Apr 08, 2026
In using immigration to target Farm and food chain workers, as well as other essential industries like carework, cleaning, and food chains, our federal government is committing us to a food system in danger.
A food system where Farmworkers, meat packers, and other food chain workers are threatened with violence is not a system that will keep families healthy and fed. It is not a system that the soils and waterways of our planet can sustain, and it is not a system that will support us in surviving climate change. We each have a role to take in moving toward a food system free of exploitation.
The threat of immigration enforcement, which has always been hand in hand with racism, makes all workers vulnerable. This form of abuse from employers, landlords, and law enforcement is used to threaten and remove workers who organize against their exploitation. This is true even in places like Washington State, where laws like the Keep Washington Working Act which prohibits local law enforcement agencies from giving any non public information to Federal Immigration officers for the purpose of civil immigration enforcement , and the recently passed HB 2165 banning mask use by law enforcement offer some kind of protection.
Legal protections are critical, but their enforcement crawls at a snail’s pace and the violence against Farmworkers is growing rapidly and exponentially. Our communities are experiencing attacks on multiple fronts: The physical violence of a militarized immigration police force, but also in efforts to pass dehumanizing federal laws while eroding the local and state capacity to respond. Local governments are slow and reluctant to use limited backstops to take action.
We have seen this most vividly in the detainment of our friend and Farmworker organizer Alfredo ‘Lelo’ Juarez, who was abducted from his car while on the way to work in Mount Vernon in March 2025. As a teenager, Lelo helped organize local Farmworkers to create the independent union Familias Unidas por la Justicia. After four months in Tacoma at the private immigration prison owned by Geo Group, which is notorious for inhumane conditions, he chose to return to Mexico.
In Washington State we are also alarmed to see the exponential growth of the H-2A visa program; which places Farmworkers in a permanent second class. When you are separated from your family, while your housing and other basic needs are tied to your continued employment at aspecific farm, there is little to no room to push back against unsafe working conditions. In the last year/two years, H2-A visas have grown exponentially in Washington State. Nationally, the Farm Workforce Modernization Act would nationalize and expand the use of this pseudo-slavery program. Last October, the Trump administration lowered the national wage paid to H2A workers and changed the rules of the program to make it cheaper and easier for farms to contract workers.
The exploitation of people in our food and agricultural systems has been part of the United States since before our founding., The H2-A visa and ICE’s current state-sanctioned violence is profoundly rooted in the enslavement of Black people and the enforcement of that slavery through patrols.
Our experience here in our local communities is also connected. We can clearly see ICE targeting communities where low-wage immigrant workers live – mobile home parks and farmworker housing complexes. We witness their testing our tolerance, and desensitizing us to unspeakable violence. Community members rightly connect masked agents in unmarked vehicles to this administration’s sowing of terror between neighbors in our own neighborhoods where we sleep, work, and our children go to school.
We know from our years of organizing with Farmworkers and allies that this is not the food system that most people want. We have the power to change our food system to a just one; where people and the planet are equally cared for, and where our essential resources are protected for future generations. It is incumbent upon each of us to push back against exploitative practices like the H2A visa program while at the same time building a food system that holds equal care and protection for workers, the earth, and the families that are sustained by it.
Rosalinda Guillén is a longtime farmworker rights organizer based in Washington State. She is the founder and executive director of Community to Community Development, where she works on immigrant rights, food justice, and labor organizing.
Immigration Crackdowns Are Breaking the Food System was first published by Washington Latino News and was republished with permission. WALN is an affiliate of the Latino News Network.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More

















