Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Identifying division is easy; finding points of agreement is difficult

Andrew Yang

The Forward Party, founded by Andrew Yang, "will greatly increase the overall health of our democracy while helping to put the power back into the hands of voters," writes Copenhaver.

Marco Bello/Getty Images

Copenhaver, a former mayor of Augusta, Ga., hosts “The Changemaker Podcast and is a founding partner of Starts With Us.

Negative campaigning is increasing in volume and nastiness every election cycle. Campaigns are based on a “divide and conquer” strategy, pitting citizens against each other. If you ask most political operatives why this is the case, they’ll tell you it’s because it works. It drives donations, volunteer engagement and turnout. And while I won’t debate that it works, it’s not the only approach that works.


Believe me, I know. In the past 19 years, I’ve been a part of four local campaigns in Augusta, Ga. Each one focused on being positive, uplifting and inclusive of people from all walks of life. This principle resulted in three successful campaigns for mayor in a city of 200,000, earning support from 56 percent of voters in 2005, 65 percent in 2006, and 64 percent in 2010. Instead of “divide and conquer,” we focused on “unite and overcome,” bringing citizens together by using constant grassroots outreach to rally them around a common cause.

So why, then, is negative campaigning so prevalent? It’s not because it works — it’s because it’s easy.

Finding points of division and exploiting them is easy, while working to find points of agreement is much more difficult. I’ve spent my political career doing both, though, to great success, and that’s why I’m so excited to be a part of the Forward Party.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Forward, a centrist political party founded by 2020 Democratic presidential and 2021 New York mayoral candidate Andrew Yang, describes its goals as the reduction of partisan polarization and the implementation of electoral reforms.

I was recently asked to join the Forward Party's advisory board, and I agreed to serve without hesitation. Our democracy is not sustainable on its current trajectory, driven by political extremism on both sides of the aisle. Sadly, the normalization of inflammatory political rhetoric in our nation has directly contributed to the recent rise in political violence.

I believe that as a viable third party — something that a recent Gallup poll showed has the support of 63 of Americans — the Forward Party will greatly increase the overall health of our democracy while helping to put the power back into the hands of voters. The efforts of Forward to dial down the anger, animosity and often sheer hatred we see between representatives of both legacy parties is a necessary intervention in a political environment that continues to become more and more dangerous.

Forward’s values resonate with me, especially treating everyone with dignity and respect and building from the bottom up and not the top down. I honestly believe that positive change in our nation must start at the grassroots level. I’ve also witnessed firsthand that voters will turn to an alternative to the toxic and divisive status quo of hyper-partisan politics if they are provided with one.

In February, 10 years after I left office, Mayor Garnett Johnson tapped me to run the Augusta Stronger Together campaign, which aimed to ensure that the mayor — the primary executive elected directly by the people — would have a full and equal vote on the Augusta Commission. We deployed the “unite and overcome” approach and, on May 21, the referendum was approved with 74 percent of the vote. Through the campaign, we were able to educate, inform, engage and empower our local electorate, which mirrors another goal of the Forward Party.

My campaigns for mayor and the ballot referendum were won with an average of 64.75 percent of the vote, proving that focusing on building more unity in our communities and healing our political divides is not some pie-in-the-sky dream but rather a winning political strategy. Each one was completely grassroots-driven and none were about asking anyone to swear fealty to any political ideology, another Forward principle that resonates with me. Working across all lines of difference, each individual campaign had at its core respecting and appreciating that our citizens are all different, but together we comprise one community. Each one also showed the difference we can make when we commit to joining hands and working together towards a common goal.

I’ve always pointed out that good leadership is about providing people with hope. That is much harder than exploiting their fears, but, as one of our greatest presidents said, we do these things “not because they are easy, but because they are hard because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills.”

With a decidedly dark political landscape facing our nation, the Forward Party is looking to bring those of us together who want a hopeful future. It won’t be easy; in fact, it will be quite hard. But our focus on preserving our democracy for current and future generations of Americans is something that provides me with a beacon of hope in the darkness.

I hope it does for you as well.

Read More

Flag of Ukraine alongside flag of United States

Flags of Ukraine and the United States

Alex Wong/Getty Images

In swing states, D’s and R’s agree U.S. should continue aid to Ukraine

Amid debates about U.S. international engagement, a new public consultation survey conducted in six swing states by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation found widespread bipartisan support for the United States continuing to provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

Majorities of both Republicans and Democrats support the U.S. upholding the principle of collective security by helping to protect nations that are under attack; continuing to be a member of NATO; and continuing to abide by the longstanding international ban on nuclear testing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red and blue fingers pointing at each other
PM Images/Getty Images

Maybe America needs a mom to call a time out

Klug served in the House of Representatives from 1991 to 1999. He hosts the political podcast “Lost in the Middle: America’s Political Orphans.”

All of us have had that moment. An innocent comment over coffee with a friend, at a family dinner or while riding an elevator with a coworker. Everyone is at edge over politics. Nerves are rubbed raw. Civility has seemingly vanished.

When asked to rate the level of political division in the country on a scale of 0-100, where 0 is no division and 100 is the edge of a civil war, the mean response is 71, according to the Georgetown University Institute of Public Service. A similar share of Americans tell Pew they worry about political disagreements triggering more violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ben Klutsey

Our views on the issues haven't changed that much over the past several decades. If anything, we’ve moved a little bit closer to each other. But the way we feel about each other has changed over time," said Ben Klutsey, director of the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center.

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘A truly pluralistic society has both inclusion and dissent’: A conversation with Ben Klutsey

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the sixth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

The documentary film “Undivide Us” brings together Americans from across the political spectrum for conversations about abortion, immigration, guns and other controversial issues. According to Ben Klutsey, who helped facilitate the conversations, “Participants came in expecting shouting matches, but they ended up exchanging phone numbers and wanting to stay connected because they found each other to be incredibly interesting. People are not as polarized as we think they are when we look at our screens and social media.”

This could also serve as a mission statement for Klutsey, who directs the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center, a libertarian research center housed at George Mason University. At Mercatus, Klutsey is attempting to build a community of students and scholars who can exchange ideas and coexist with one another peacefully despite their political differences. Klutsey also regularly interviews leading thinkers about liberalism for the online journal Discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less
Caroline Mehl

"Some of the biggest factors causing polarization today are identity-based issues," said Caroline Mehl. "Issues that touch on identity tend to be the things that are the most difficult to talk about and the things that bring people furthest apart."

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

'We’re in the danger zone': A conversation with Caroline Mehl

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the third in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

College campuses are often depicted as “ivory towers,” purposefully set apart from the rest of the world so that students and faculty can pursue intellectual inquiry in an unfettered way. But of course, colleges are not immune to what happens in the world beyond their gates. This includes the problem of political polarization.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mark Gerzon headshot

Meet the change leaders: Mark Gerzon

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Mark Gerzon, president and founder of Mediators Foundation, has specialized in leadership that bridges divides. His concern about the increasing polarization in America led him to devote the past three decades to working on the ideological frontier between the left and right.

Keep ReadingShow less