Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The war behind the presidential election

Repairing our torn social fabric starts with artful listening

White House split into red and blue halves
Douglas Rissing/Getty Image

Hsu focuses on awareness through music in her Conscious Listening classes and residencies. Hsu is also a public voices fellow with The Op Ed Project.

This presidential election is one of the most high stakes and divisive races any of us have experienced. As we wait anxiously to see how swing state voters will decide the election for the rest of us, many feel powerless and irrelevant.

The frightening reality is that we have reached a tipping point where distrust and disconnection have become normalized. We no longer seem to have common values or the civility to disagree respectfully. And when we lose the ability to connect, reason disappears. We urgently need to reclaim the power to connect with ourselves and with others.


As a Juilliard-trained pianist and educator specializing in listening skills, as an immigrant working with partners and clients from multiple cultures, and as an arts entrepreneur seeking innovative opportunities to engage, I believe it is not too late to weave a stronger cultural fabric — if we all participate.

My work in music is often misunderstood to be the work of playing notes quickly and accurately. However, it is not the individual notes but the moment-to-moment listening and consequent decisions that create the spirit of the piece.

Most of my time is spent listening for what is missing. Building connections between the different elements, imagining how the harmony and the dynamic contour can better support each other, teasing out what is primary and what is secondary information, creating a tensegrity of multidimensional layers.

Whatever happens in November, after the election we will still have another war to fight. And that will be between our own cynicism — the curse we have created for ourselves — and a conscious decision to disarm and reconnect tense relationships. When the opposition goads us, it is hard to stay dignified and not retaliate. But creating unity and reconciliation demands we give up something.

When we listen to the opposition, we are not condoning irresponsible behavior, forfeiting our right to speak our own perspective or throwing blame around. We are doing our part to engage and create the opportunity for a pathway forward.

While we can’t change the minds of those entrenched in xenophobia or personal wealth or conspiracy theories, we can creatively improve the cultural conditions that prime our brains to connect with each other. If we each level up our listening strategies, our collective impact adds up over time. Here are four tactics I use as a teacher, to foster engagement.

1. Notice and applaud the courage to take emotional risks. Human beings, like live music, require a willing audience in order to reveal their inner being. Many people who might normally withdraw to avoid potential conflict will open up to a listening ear.

A recent study in the International Journal of Education Social Studies and Management shows how a teacher’s interpersonal communication style directly impacts student behavior. When a teacher shows appreciation to the student sharing a perspective, the student responds with more enthusiasm to learn. When students see that I am invested in their well-being, they are more likely to share what they are actually thinking and feeling. And I get an extra thrill when I see a performer who would risk an extra moment of silence to completely connect with the audience in the moment, rather than safely execute a rhythm to avoid reproach.

2. Ask questions. Approach conversations as multilayered and open-ended. For instance, you might ask, “I noticed that he frowned when you mentioned his mother. Did you also notice it?” Situations, like music, have many elements such as main theme, harmonic tone, pacing, dynamic contour, etc.

By engaging through multiple dimensions, we can loosen up people’s grip on the idea that any single view is a complete reality and open them up to wonder, “Why? Why not? What if?” Reaching a mutual understanding that we are all fallible results in more willingness to listen and not judge.

3. Connect the dots between personal morals and systemic issues. Moral reframing is using personal morals to open up a conversation about a larger issue a person may ordinarily be ideologically or politically opposed to. Regardless of a political party’s stance on universal health care, we can agree that having healthy workers who are not devastated by unexpected health care bills is essential to a stable economy.

A pretty chord by itself isn’t meaningful until it finds a place in a string of chords to create a harmonic progression. In life, too, we need a mindset to connect personal values with current issues, and individual needs with collective ones.

4. Observe and adapt. If political issues are too triggering, we can find other points of engagement. If we can’t directly talk about candidates, we can sidestep to related issues like how to get young voters involved and how to make voting easier.

To be sure, this high quality of intentional engagement is not easy and we will do it imperfectly. I am among the busy people who failed to notice right-wing radio hosts sowing the seeds of distrust with no oversight. I am among the intimidated people who didn’t fight back when progressive friends condescendingly condemned belief in the divine as a mental crutch. But I am still in the fight for a better future.

Whatever the election outcome, our underlying problem of disconnection will remain. Until we reach a healthy tipping point back into discourse, there will always be another threat waiting in the wings to hijack the country. Let’s resist these forces of destruction by evolving our collective listening to find cohesion, connection and creativity, just as we do when we listen to beautiful music.

Read More

High School Civic Innovators Bridging America’s Divide

At just 17 years of age, Sophie Kim was motivated to start her organization, Bipartisan Bridges, to bring together people from both ends of the political spectrum. What started as just an idea during her freshman year of high school took off after Sophie placed in the Civics Unplugged pitch contest, hosted for alumni in Spring 2024. Since then, Sophie has continued to expand Bipartisan Bridges' impact, creating spaces that foster civil dialogue and facilitate meaningful connections across party lines.

Sophie, a graduate of the Spring 2024 Civic Innovators Fellowship and the Summer 2025 Civic Innovation Academy at UCLA, serves as the founder and executive director of Bipartisan Bridges. In this role, Sophie has forged a partnership with the organization Braver Angels to host depolarization workshops and has led the coordination and capture of conversations on climate change, abortion, gun control, foreign aid, and the 100 Men vs. a Gorilla debate. In addition, this year, Sophie planned and oversaw Bipartisan Bridges’ flagship Politics and Polarization Fellowship, an eight-week, in-person program involving youth from Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Huntington Beach, California. A recent Bipartisan Bridges session featuring youth from both Los Angeles and Orange County will be featured in Bridging the Gap, an upcoming documentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less