Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

5 Things Americans Agree on at The Start of Trump's Second Term

News

5 Things Americans Agree on at The Start of Trump's Second Term

Group of People Waving American Flags in Back Lit

Getty Images//Rawpixel

More In Common, a nonprofit dedicated to finding ways to bridge political divisions in the US, released a new report that spotlights key areas of agreement across the political spectrum in the early days of the Trump administration.

The report, released last week, reveals a shared consensus on wildfire relief, respect for our allies, a commitment to the constitution, and a desire for unity even though each side is skeptical of the other.


How President Trump and US lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle govern will highlight which voters they are listening to -- if they are listening at all.

US Voters Want Leaders That Follow the Constitution

For example, 74% of Americans, including 73% of Republicans and 71% of independents, believe President Trump should always follow the US Constitution, even if it means he can't get some things done.

One respondent that identified as a Trump voter in 2024 said “He should follow the Constitution and not break laws to do what he wants."

An interesting data point, however, is that Gen Z men stood apart from other survey groups. Forty-two percent (42%) said there are some instances in which Trump would be justified in ignoring the Constitution.

There are also more younger voters in Gen Y and Gen Z who at least somewhat prefer a political leader who is willing to bend the rules, though not a majority (36% of Millennials and 35% of Gen Zers).

Most Americans Want to See Federal Aid for California Wildfire Relief

When it comes to federal aid for natural disasters, whether it is a tornado or hurricane or wildfire, Americans have historically come together in favor of helping victims and people in need.

The California wildfires are no different -- though partisan politics has become a variable (including how people expect others to respond). More In Common found 78% of Americans at least somewhat support the US government providing assistance for relief efforts. This includes 90% of Democrats, 72% of Republicans, and 76% of independents.

Overall support among Republicans was higher than independents and Democrats expected, highlighting how the narratives over partisan divisions have caused people to see the worst in others.

For example, Republican support for relief was at 72%, but independents expected that support to be at 48% and Democrats expected it to be at 40%.

"Divided" Is the Most Common Description for America Today

Americans agree partisan divisions in the US are a problem. In fact, "divided" was the most common word used to describe the nation across the political spectrum in the survey, including 61% of independents.

The second most common description was "chaotic."

However, Americans were more likely to say the most desired quality for the US was "united" at nearly half of all respondents, followed by "honest" for independents and Democrats and "hard-working" for Republicans.

“My biggest hope is for our leaders to work together to build America back up; the land of the free for all and home of the brave," said one respondent who identified as a Harris voter in 2024.

Most Americans Want a Foreign Policy That Respects Allies and Defends Democracies

More In Common found that a majority of Americans want a foreign policy approach that respects America's allies, ensures the US is respected, stays out of foreign conflicts, but also protects democracies.

For example, 71% of survey respondents agreed the US should "honor our international alliances." Sixty-five percent (65%) said the US should "make sure the world respects America."

Sixty-three percent (63%) agreed that the US should "stay out of wars and conflicts around the world," but 60% also believe it is the US's responsibility to protect democracies from being invaded by powerful neighbors.

Elon Musk's Involvement in US Politics Gets Mixed Responses

The world's richest man, Elon Musk, has not shied away from the political arena in the US and other countries around the world, most notably supporting Donald Trump's campaign for a second presidential term.

To say there have been moments of controversy is an understatement, and how voters view him and his involvement in the nation's politics tends to come down to their own political leanings.

For example, "smart" was the most common word used to describe Musk for Americans at-large, but especially among moderates (34%), traditional conservatives (45%), and devoted conservatives (57%).

The further right a voter falls, the more favorably they tend to view Musk. The further left a voter falls, the more likely they are to describe him as "dangerous."

However, regardless of how voters view him, Americans at-large are critical of his involvement in American politics. The data found that 28% of total survey respondents thought Musk's role was at least somewhat good.

Twenty-three percent (23%) said there was an equal mix of good and bad, while 37% said somewhat or very bad.

“Elon Musk's track record in revolutionizing industries like electric vehicles and space exploration demonstrates his ability to drive significant change," said one respondent who identified as a traditional conservative and Trump voter.

"However, his involvement in politics should be carefully monitored to ensure that his decisions align with the public interest and do not disproportionately benefit his own ventures.”

Check out more from More in Common's report here.

5 Things Americans Agree on at The Start of Trump's Second Term was first published on Independent Voter News, and was republished with permission.

Shawn Griffiths is the national editor of Independent Voter News, where a version of this story first appeared.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less