Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

5 Things Americans Agree on at The Start of Trump's Second Term

5 Things Americans Agree on at The Start of Trump's Second Term

Group of People Waving American Flags in Back Lit

Getty Images//Rawpixel

More In Common, a nonprofit dedicated to finding ways to bridge political divisions in the US, released a new report that spotlights key areas of agreement across the political spectrum in the early days of the Trump administration.

The report, released last week, reveals a shared consensus on wildfire relief, respect for our allies, a commitment to the constitution, and a desire for unity even though each side is skeptical of the other.


How President Trump and US lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle govern will highlight which voters they are listening to -- if they are listening at all.

US Voters Want Leaders That Follow the Constitution

For example, 74% of Americans, including 73% of Republicans and 71% of independents, believe President Trump should always follow the US Constitution, even if it means he can't get some things done.

One respondent that identified as a Trump voter in 2024 said “He should follow the Constitution and not break laws to do what he wants."

An interesting data point, however, is that Gen Z men stood apart from other survey groups. Forty-two percent (42%) said there are some instances in which Trump would be justified in ignoring the Constitution.

There are also more younger voters in Gen Y and Gen Z who at least somewhat prefer a political leader who is willing to bend the rules, though not a majority (36% of Millennials and 35% of Gen Zers).

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Most Americans Want to See Federal Aid for California Wildfire Relief

When it comes to federal aid for natural disasters, whether it is a tornado or hurricane or wildfire, Americans have historically come together in favor of helping victims and people in need.

The California wildfires are no different -- though partisan politics has become a variable (including how people expect others to respond).More In Common found 78% of Americans at least somewhat support the US government providing assistance for relief efforts. This includes 90% of Democrats, 72% of Republicans, and 76% of independents.

Overall support among Republicans was higher than independents and Democrats expected, highlighting how the narratives over partisan divisions have caused people to see the worst in others.

For example, Republican support for relief was at 72%, but independents expected that support to be at 48% and Democrats expected it to be at 40%.

"Divided" Is the Most Common Description for America Today

Americans agree partisan divisions in the US are a problem. In fact, "divided" was the most common word used to describe the nation across the political spectrum in the survey, including 61% of independents.

The second most common description was "chaotic."

However, Americans were more likely to say the most desired quality for the US was "united" at nearly half of all respondents, followed by "honest" for independents and Democrats and "hard-working" for Republicans.

“My biggest hope is for our leaders to work together to build America back up; the land of the free for all and home of the brave," said one respondent who identified as a Harris voter in 2024.

Most Americans Want a Foreign Policy That Respects Allies and Defends Democracies

More In Common found that a majority of Americans want a foreign policy approach that respects America's allies, ensures the US is respected, stays out of foreign conflicts, but also protects democracies.

For example, 71% of survey respondents agreed the US should "honor our international alliances." Sixty-five percent (65%) said the US should "make sure the world respects America."

Sixty-three percent (63%) agreed that the US should "stay out of wars and conflicts around the world," but 60% also believe it is the US's responsibility to protect democracies from being invaded by powerful neighbors.

Elon Musk's Involvement in US Politics Gets Mixed Responses

The world's richest man, Elon Musk, has not shied away from the political arena in the US and other countries around the world, most notably supporting Donald Trump's campaign for a second presidential term.

To say there have been moments of controversy is an understatement, and how voters view him and his involvement in the nation's politics tends to come down to their own political leanings.

For example, "smart" was the most common word used to describe Musk for Americans at-large, but especially among moderates (34%), traditional conservatives (45%), and devoted conservatives (57%).

The further right a voter falls, the more favorably they tend to view Musk. The further left a voter falls, the more likely they are to describe him as "dangerous."

However, regardless of how voters view him, Americans at-large are critical of his involvement in American politics. The data found that 28% of total survey respondents thought Musk's role was at least somewhat good.

Twenty-three percent (23%) said there was an equal mix of good and bad, while 37% said somewhat or very bad.

“Elon Musk's track record in revolutionizing industries like electric vehicles and space exploration demonstrates his ability to drive significant change," said one respondent who identified as a traditional conservative and Trump voter.

"However, his involvement in politics should be carefully monitored to ensure that his decisions align with the public interest and do not disproportionately benefit his own ventures.”

Check out more from More in Common's report here.

5 Things Americans Agree on at The Start of Trump's Second Term was first published on Independent Voter News, and was republished with permission.

Shawn Griffiths is the national editor of Independent Voter News, where a version of this story first appeared.

Read More

Sacred Succession: The Pope's Final Gift to Democracy
a person standing on a sidewalk with a hat on
Photo by Chris Weiher on Unsplash

Sacred Succession: The Pope's Final Gift to Democracy

When the bells of St. Peter's Basilica tolled on Easter Monday, announcing Pope Francis's death at 88, they rang for the world's 1.3 billion Catholics and all of humanity. During the moment of transition for the Catholic Church, we witnessed the conclave, a ritual of power transfer that predates modern democracy yet might offer surprising lessons for our contemporary political moment.

The death of a pope represents more than a religious milestone. It is a moment that transcends theological boundaries, offering insights into how institutions navigate succession, how power transfers in an age of global uncertainty, and how ancient traditions might illuminate modern challenges.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Pope

The newly elected Pontiff, Pope Leo XIV is seen for the first time from the Vatican balcony on May 8, 2025 in Vatican City, Vatican.

(Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

The American Pope

Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost made history on Thursday by being elected as the pope, marking the first time an American has been chosen for this role within the Roman Catholic Church. At 69 years old, he has taken on the papal name Leo XIV.

Originally from Chicago, Prevost has dedicated much of his ministry to Peru. His election occurred on the second day of the cardinals' conclave in Vatican City, after four ballots were cast.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Macomb Community College on April 29, 2025 at Warren, Michigan.

President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Macomb Community College on April 29, 2025 at Warren, Michigan.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

​​The American Schism in 2025: Understanding the Other Side

In distilling lessons from my research onAmerican Schism, I often refer to a secret sauce or magic formula that U.S. citizens deployed at times during our history to productively bridge major societal divisions. To be clear, in these periods, the rifts endured but relying on the formula’s specific ingredients led us to better outcomes as compared to other eras when this formula was abandoned. In the former moments, we often forged new policy solutions — in the latter, we often experienced violent episodes.

One of the three key elements of this magic formula is what I label deep empathetic listening (stay tuned to this series for future discussion of the other two elements). Sounding simple but too often forsaken today, this form of listening is not easy work. It is analogous to a routine practice from high school debate club: first, through research and critical thinking, one constructs a rational argument for a particular point of view supported by data and carefully vetted sources. Then, perhaps a week later, one is assigned the same but from the opposing point of view. It is perhaps not surprising that our civic discourse has collapsed today — with current communication methods and platforms such as social media, critically researched data is sparse while sanctimonious outrage is omnipresent.

Keep ReadingShow less