Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

For this community, being a local doesn’t mean being in person

Woman with a horse by a river

SuzAnne Miller has been building a virtual community at her ranch.

Dunrovin Ranch

The Aspen Institute’s Weave: The Social Fabric Project tackles the problem of broken trust that has left Americans divided, lonely, and in social gridlock. Weave connects and invests in grassroots leaders stepping up to weave a new, inclusive social fabric where they live. This is the third in an ongoing series telling the stories of community weavers from across the country.

Skoler is communications director for Weave: The Social Fabric Project.

SuzAnne Miller runs a Montana guest ranch that has become “home” for people across the world. Most have never visited in person. They live there thanks to webcams, microphones, live chats and community sharing.

Miller doesn’t use technology to create a virtual place that is artificial. She is using it to let people who need community share a real place and connect deeply through it. Her work started simply enough.


In 2011, University of Montana researchers approached her about installing a web camera at her horse ranch in Lolo to study the behavior of ospreys. She accepted and by the following year, hundreds of thousands were watching. When the ospreys left the nest and Miller turned the camera off, people started calling and emailing to ask her to keep the camera on.

“At first I didn’t get it,” says Miller. “I thought, ‘Get a life! What do you mean you want to watch my ranch?’” She reluctantly left the camera on and went on with her life. And then, she fell ill.

She became home-bound for six months. For the first time, she looked at the livestream and understood why it meant so much to so many people. “When your life is confined to four walls, having a portal to the natural world, where lots of things are happening and where you can talk to real people, it's very powerful.”

People who had lost mobility or felt isolated where they lived were visiting the ranch daily and talking with each other about it on social media. They saw the ranch as their community.

So Miller and her husband worked with them to expand the experience. They put in more cameras and created Days at Dunrovin, a website where folks can chat, volunteer to become camera operators and interact with staff at the ranch through a two-way microphone system. They added an $8-per-month paywall to support the technology and keep trolls from crashing the conversations.

For Diane Hoffman of Kenneth Square, Pa., the ranch was a safe place to deal with the death of her husband. “It’s a place where it's calm, nobody is fighting, and where people are nice to each other. It was the perfect place for me to rejoin the world.” Online guests have visited in person and some have asked if it could be a final resting place when they die. Miller’s work doesn’t fit the usual idea that weaving is local, done mainly in person. Yet the relationships and trust in Dunrovin’s community show people are weaving lasting connections. Miller, a retired researcher, surveyed the members and found that Days at Dunrovin offers emotional and mental health benefits very similar to those of a close physical community.

You can see the ranch and learn more about Miller’s work in this six-minute Montana PBS video. Miller is part of the Weave Speakers Bureau. If you are interested in bringing her or any of our speakers to your community, you can make a request here.

This story first appeared in Weave’s weekly newsletter.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Political outrage is rising—but dismissing the other side’s anger deepens division. Learn why taking outrage seriously can bridge America’s partisan divide.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Taking Outrage Seriously: Understanding the Moral Signals Behind Political Anger

Over the last several weeks, the Trump administration has deployed the National Guard to the nation’s capital to crack down on crime. While those on the right have long been aghast by rioting and disorder in our cities, pressing for greater military intervention to curtail it, progressive residents of D.C. have tirelessly protested the recent militarization of the city.

This recent flashpoint is a microcosm of the reciprocal outrage at the heart of contemporary American public life. From social media posts to street protests to everyday conversations about "the other side," we're witnessing unprecedented levels of political outrage. And as polarization has increased, we’ve stopped even considering the other political party’s concerns, responding instead with amusement and delight. Schadenfreude, or pleasure at someone else’s pain, is now more common than solidarity or empathy across party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less