Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

For this community, being a local doesn’t mean being in person

Woman with a horse by a river

SuzAnne Miller has been building a virtual community at her ranch.

Dunrovin Ranch

The Aspen Institute’s Weave: The Social Fabric Project tackles the problem of broken trust that has left Americans divided, lonely, and in social gridlock. Weave connects and invests in grassroots leaders stepping up to weave a new, inclusive social fabric where they live. This is the third in an ongoing series telling the stories of community weavers from across the country.

Skoler is communications director for Weave: The Social Fabric Project.

SuzAnne Miller runs a Montana guest ranch that has become “home” for people across the world. Most have never visited in person. They live there thanks to webcams, microphones, live chats and community sharing.

Miller doesn’t use technology to create a virtual place that is artificial. She is using it to let people who need community share a real place and connect deeply through it. Her work started simply enough.


In 2011, University of Montana researchers approached her about installing a web camera at her horse ranch in Lolo to study the behavior of ospreys. She accepted and by the following year, hundreds of thousands were watching. When the ospreys left the nest and Miller turned the camera off, people started calling and emailing to ask her to keep the camera on.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

“At first I didn’t get it,” says Miller. “I thought, ‘Get a life! What do you mean you want to watch my ranch?’” She reluctantly left the camera on and went on with her life. And then, she fell ill.

She became home-bound for six months. For the first time, she looked at the livestream and understood why it meant so much to so many people. “When your life is confined to four walls, having a portal to the natural world, where lots of things are happening and where you can talk to real people, it's very powerful.”

People who had lost mobility or felt isolated where they lived were visiting the ranch daily and talking with each other about it on social media. They saw the ranch as their community.

So Miller and her husband worked with them to expand the experience. They put in more cameras and created Days at Dunrovin, a website where folks can chat, volunteer to become camera operators and interact with staff at the ranch through a two-way microphone system. They added an $8-per-month paywall to support the technology and keep trolls from crashing the conversations.

For Diane Hoffman of Kenneth Square, Pa., the ranch was a safe place to deal with the death of her husband. “It’s a place where it's calm, nobody is fighting, and where people are nice to each other. It was the perfect place for me to rejoin the world.” Online guests have visited in person and some have asked if it could be a final resting place when they die. Miller’s work doesn’t fit the usual idea that weaving is local, done mainly in person. Yet the relationships and trust in Dunrovin’s community show people are weaving lasting connections. Miller, a retired researcher, surveyed the members and found that Days at Dunrovin offers emotional and mental health benefits very similar to those of a close physical community.

You can see the ranch and learn more about Miller’s work in this six-minute Montana PBS video. Miller is part of the Weave Speakers Bureau. If you are interested in bringing her or any of our speakers to your community, you can make a request here.

This story first appeared in Weave’s weekly newsletter.

Read More

Mismatched letters speelling out "respect"
Thinglass

The power of disrespect: Introducing the Return2Respect movement

Marinace is the coordinator of the Return2Respect movement.

My first thought was to extol the virtues of respect. However, we all know respect is good and right and necessary. But do we really know the impacts of disrespect on individuals and our democratic principles?

Disrespect manifests itself through incivility, impacting how people relate to one another. A 2012 survey conducted by PRRI showed 82 percent of Americans believed lack of civil discourse among politicians was a serious problem. By 2023, a Pew study showed it still at 84 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red and blue heads colliding
wildpixel/Getty Images

Toxic political talk undermines the foundations of our country

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 presidential race is heating up and, with it, an alarming trend has emerged in how we as a nation are talking to each other. It's not just a matter of political strategy; it's a crisis that demands our immediate attention.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Yphtach Lelkes

"When everyone on your side believes one thing and everyone on the other side believes the other thing, you can no longer build coalitions, and democracy doesn't work very well," said Yphtach Lelkes, co-director of the Polarization Research Lab.

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘The problem comes from the top’: A conversation with Yphtach Lelkes

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the fifth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

On Jan. 6, 2021, the threat of political violence in the United States became an issue of urgent national concern. America has long had political extremists who have advocated for violent struggle of one kind or another — Weather Underground, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and others. But the rioting on Capitol Hill seemed to suggest something else entirely — namely, that support for political violence had moved from the fringes and into the mainstream of American life.

According to Robert Pape of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats at the University of Chicago, more than half of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists were white-collar workers — business owners, architects, doctors and lawyers. “We need to really come to grips with the fact that what we saw on Jan. 6 is not simply the usual bad apples acting out yet again,” Pape says.

What do Americans really think about political violence? How widespread is support for the use of force to achieve political goals? It is difficult to wrap your arms around these kinds of questions. Different polls suggest different answers.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up of dictionary definition of extremism
Devonyu/Getty Images

Casual extremism and how language in the middle enables the extremes

McAleer is the author of "The Cure For Hate – A Former White Supremacist's Journey From Violent Extremism To Radical Compassion." He co-founded Life After Hate and is a founding partner of the Builders Movement.

When I was a white supremacist who had infiltrated the Canadian military reserves, an officer who had spent two tours of Northern Ireland embedded in a British unit told me that the Irish Republican Army had only 75 active personnel who pulled triggers and planted bombs. Behind those combatants were 3,500 people who offered them safe houses and storage for their ammunition. Bolstering them was a much broader community of people who endorsed their efforts.

Ultimately, decades of sectarian violence were perpetrated by a small group of people on each side; but it was the broader public's support that gave extremists permission to carry out their carnage.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person feelign anxiety, peering through an American flag

Resist demonizing the "other" side, writes Javanbakht.

Moor Studio/Getty Images

Dealing with election anxiety? A psychiatrist explains how to channel your fears and break out of tribal thinking.

Javanbakht is an associate professor of psychiatry at Wayne State University.

Instead of excitement about the upcoming election, many of my patients and friends – regardless of political affiliation – report they’re terrified at the thought of the “other side” winning. Democrats tell me they fear Donald Trump will end our democracy; Republicans are afraid Kamala Harris will turn the United States into a socialist society without family values.

Watching the news leaves people from both parties exhausted, sad and scared about the future. Each half of the country is made to believe the other half is stupid, deeply misguided, immoral, dishonest or maliciously plotting to ruin the country they themselves love.

I am a psychiatrist who specializes in treating and researching fear and anxiety. My book, “Afraid: Understanding the Purpose of Fear, and Harnessing the Power of Anxiety,” explores the politics of fear and the role media play in modern anxieties. Scientific insights on fear can provide a helpful perspective on election anxieties and suggest some practical tips on managing politics-related worries.

Keep ReadingShow less