Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same

Opinion

The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
a red hat that reads make america great again

Recently, while listening to a podcast, I came across the term “reprise” in the context of music and theater. A reprise is a repeated element in a performance—a song or scene returning to reinforce themes or emotions introduced earlier. In a play or film, a familiar melody might reappear, reminding the audience of a previous moment and deepening its significance.

That idea got me thinking about how reprise might apply to the events shaping our lives today. It’s easy to believe that the times we are living through are entirely unprecedented—that the chaos and uncertainty we experience are unlike anything before. Yet, reflecting on the nature of a reprise, I began to reconsider. Perhaps history does not simply move forward in a straight line; rather, it cycles back, echoing familiar themes in new forms.


While we often see today’s events as singular and unique, maybe they are simply another reprise—altered in detail, but woven from patterns that have appeared before. History has a way of repeating itself, sometimes with different actors and circumstances, yet with recognizable themes that persist across generations.

In many ways, old ideas resurface in new contexts, reaffirming the familiar saying: “The more things change, the more they stay the same.”

Looking at America today, I wonder if the MAGA political movement is a reprise of a past era. If history rhymes, what lessons can we draw from previous cycles to better understand the present moment?

The world we live in today feels vastly different—artificial intelligence reshapes industries, social media amplifies voices like never before, and the political shifts of the MAGA era have dramatically altered the national conversation. It’s easy to feel swept up in the rapid pace of change, as if events are spiraling in unpredictable ways.

Yet, despite these transformations, some fundamental patterns, behaviors, and structures persist over time. Beneath the evolution of technology and politics, deeper historical rhythms continue to play out. History often echoes itself, repeating cycles with new actors and altered circumstances, but familiar themes nonetheless, oftentimes with fresh nuances.

Here are a few enduring patterns that have shaped—and continue to shape—our world:

  • Economic Cycles: Boom-and-bust patterns have defined economies for centuries—periods of rapid growth followed by downturns. The Roaring Twenties led into the Great Depression, the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s preceded the early 2000s recession, and today, just four months into Trump’s second term, the S&P 500 experienced an 18.75% drop, marking one of the sharpest drawdowns in history, only to fully recover two months later.
  • Social Movements & Civil Rights Struggles: The fight for equality has resurfaced in different forms, from abolitionism and women’s suffrage to the civil rights and LGBTQ+ movements. As the second Trump term begins, civil rights battles have reignited, with the administration rolling back diversity initiatives and closing federal offices focused on civil rights enforcement, erasing protections for transgender and binary individuals in federal regulations, and halting civil rights cases at the Department of Education.
  • Political Revolutions & Power Struggles: Governments follow familiar cycles—reform, upheaval, and authoritarian resurgence. The French Revolution set the stage for future revolutions, just as American political shifts follow historical rhythms: Eisenhower’s eight-year Republican presidency preceded Kennedy and Johnson’s Democratic leadership, just as George H.W. Bush’s term was followed by Bill Clinton’s Democratic administration. If history holds, political tides will continue to shift in the years ahead.
  • Technological Disruption: Innovation always transforms society, yet concerns remain constant—fears of job loss, ethical dilemmas, and resistance to new technology. From the printing press to industrialization, from computers to AI, each revolution sparks uncertainty alongside progress.
  • Generational Rebellion: Each generation challenges the norms set by those before them. The counterculture of the 1960s, punk rock of the 1980s, and Gen Z’s climate activism all reflect a cycle of youth-driven change. What issues will impassion the younger generation of today to rebel as past generations have repeatedly done?
  • War & Conflict: Religious tensions have fueled wars for centuries—the Crusades (1096–1291) saw battles between Christians and Muslims over the Holy Land, while the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) devastated Europe as Protestant and Catholic states clashed. Today, history repeats itself: the Israel-Hamas war, the India-Pakistan conflict, and Myanmar’s Rohingya crisis each carry strong religious components.

These cycles underscore a deeper truth—while the world feels new, the patterns of history persist, shaping the present in ways we often fail to recognize.

Understanding history as a reprise—a recurring theme rather than a sequence of isolated events—can offer valuable perspective. The next time someone insists, “But this time it's different,” a phrase often heard in moments of national and global stress, it may be worth reflecting on history’s patterns. What seems entirely new often carries echoes of the past.

This perspective is especially relevant today, as concerns over democracy under the Trump administration intensify. While the situation may feel unprecedented, it shares similarities with past democratic challenges—whether in the McCarthy era, the Watergate scandal, or the Civil Rights movement—where political turmoil, executive overreach, and societal divisions tested institutions.

That said, today’s tensions have distinct characteristics, shaped by polarization, erosion of democratic norms, and deep political divisions. Yet parallels exist. In the 1970s, President Nixon waged war on the press, barring reporters and attempting to suppress the Pentagon Papers. He pressured the Justice Department, manipulated the judicial system, and orchestrated election interference—culminating in the Watergate scandal. His administration’s tactics, much like today’s concerns, underscored a broader pattern of political leaders seeking to consolidate power.

Recognizing these recurring dynamics does not diminish the uniqueness of today’s challenges—particularly in the realm of technology, where innovation is accelerating at an unprecedented rate. However, taking a step back allows us to see beyond the surface of change. Social movements, technological advances, and geopolitical shifts often follow deeper currents of human behavior—from generational rebellion to economic cycles to evolving political ideologies.

Perhaps the idea of reprise can offer perspective amid uncertainty. A historical lens reminds us that while society transforms, familiar struggles, cultural themes, and ideological debates tend to resurface in new forms. Change is inevitable, yet the foundations of human nature, societal structures, and historical cycles remain surprisingly consistent.

A thoughtful mind should ask, "Is it different this time?"—but also consider, "Is this time just another version of last time?" The specifics may evolve, but the underlying forces of ambition, fear, power, and greed often reappear in familiar patterns.

So, while history does not repeat perfectly, it is indeed a reprise—and understanding these nuances can offer both solace and caution as we navigate the present.

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less