Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Is Civility in Politics Possible?

Opinion

silhouettes of people arguing in front of an America flag
'One side will win': The danger of zero-sum framings
Pict Rider/Getty Images

In an era of increasing political polarization, the need for civility in politics has never been greater. Engaging in constructive and respectful dialogue is essential for maintaining a healthy democracy, fostering unity, and ensuring that governments function effectively. Unfortunately, modern political discourse is often characterized by hostility, personal attacks, and a reluctance to find common ground.

President Donald Trump reminded me of this deterioration in political decorum when he sparred with Maine Gov. Janet Mills, a Democrat, over transgender athletes during a meeting of governors at the White House last week.


Here is the back-and-forth as reported by the Associated Press:

“Is Maine here, the governor of Maine?” he asked.

“I’m here,” she replied.

“Are you not going to comply with it?” he asked.

“I’m complying with state and federal laws,” Mills replied.

Trump responded, “We are the federal law.” He again threatened the state’s federal funding and said Maine may be a Democratic state, but its residents largely agree with him on this issue.

“We’re going to follow the law,” she said.

“You’d better comply,” Trump warned. “Otherwise, you’re not getting any federal funding.”

“We’ll see you in court,” the governor replied.

“Good, I’ll see you in court. I look forward to that. That should be a real easy one,” Trump said. “And enjoy your life after governor because I don’t think you’ll be in elected politics.”

When politicians refuse to engage in respectful discussions, it weakens public trust in government institutions and undermines the ability of leaders to address pressing societal issues.

By prioritizing respectful dialogue, cooperation, and mutual understanding, we can rebuild trust in political institutions, promote effective governance, and create a political landscape where diverse perspectives are valued. Right?

Robert B. Talisse, a W. Alton Jones Professor of Philosophy and Political Science at Vanderbilt University, wrote in a 2020 column for The Conversation that civility may be too demanding, asking too much of passionate human nature. "People are prone to see, and complain about, incivility in their political opponents while being blind to, and silent about, the same flaws in themselves and those like them. And once they spot an opponent being uncivil, they free themselves to retaliate in kind."

The Challenges and Possibilities of Civility

Civility in politics faces numerous obstacles. Hyper-partisanship has created an environment where compromise is often seen as a weakness rather than a necessary tool for governance. When politicians and citizens prioritize ideological purity over constructive dialogue, the space for civil discourse diminishes.

Dr. Christopher Lynch, a Missouri State University political science professor, said that civil conversations aim to genuinely understand another position different from ours. Lynch was interviewed about why it’s important to maintain civility in political discussions and how to achieve it following a national survey on why political-based conflict was rising ahead of the November 2024 election.

Dr. LeAnn Brazeal, associate professor of communication, added that the goal of conversations should not be to win but to understand. “Genuine listening helps us understand and see where our interests intersect,” she said.

I agree with Brazeal and Lynch that a more productive approach is to seek a deeper understanding of the complex factors that contribute to different perspectives. Doing so can help reduce polarization and foster more constructive dialogue.

The role of social media and sensationalist news outlets is another obstacle that has exacerbated political divisions. Online platforms encourage echo chambers, where individuals are exposed only to views that align with their own, reinforcing polarization. Additionally, the immediacy and anonymity of social media facilitate hostile exchanges, making productive discussions more difficult.

In Paving the path forward to strengthening democracy, I shared that in times of high conflict, it's common for people to split into two opposing groups and view each other negatively. This can lead to generalizations and name-calling, which often dehumanize the other side and escalate tensions.

The media has a significant role in fostering a culture of civility. News outlets should strive for balanced reporting and avoid sensationalism that fuels division. Journalists can contribute to civility by holding politicians accountable for inflammatory rhetoric and promoting thoughtful discussions on key issues.

As a solutions journalism practitioner, I leverage Complicating the Narratives, which helps journalists find new ways to report on controversial issues and polarizing politics. It draws on the experience of experts in conflict mediation. When reporters use these strategies, they listen better, ask more revealing questions, effectively introduce opposing viewpoints, and embrace nuance in their reports. They learn to tell more accurate, richer, and fuller stories.

Citizens, too, are responsible for engaging in respectful discussions, seeking to understand different perspectives, and rejecting the temptation to dehumanize political opponents are crucial steps toward a more civil political landscape. Social media, in particular, should be used as a space for meaningful dialogue rather than a breeding ground for hostility and misinformation.

While the current state of political discourse may suggest that civility is unattainable, I believe it remains possible if concerted efforts are made at all levels of society.

By prioritizing respectful dialogue, cooperation, and mutual understanding, we can rebuild trust in political institutions and create a political landscape where diverse perspectives are valued. Civility in politics is not just an ideal—it is a necessity for the stability and success of any democratic society. The responsibility to uphold it lies with everyone—leaders, media, and citizens alike. Only through collective effort can we bridge divides and work towards a more inclusive and functional democracy.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and a trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

The SVL (Stories, Values, Listen) framework—which aims to bridge political divides with simple, memorable steps for productive cross-partisan conversations—is an easy-to-use tool for making an impact at scale.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Make Talking Politics Easier and More Scalable: Be SVL (Stories, Values, Listen)

How can one have a productive conversation across the political spectrum?

We offer simple, memorable guidance: Be SVL (pronounced like “civil”). SVL stands for sharing Stories, relating to a conversation partner’s Values, and closely Listening.

Keep ReadingShow less
St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less