Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Artificial intelligence can take the politics out of policymaking

artificial intellligence robot
white robot wallpaper

Pendyala is an assistant professor of applied data science at San Jose State University and is a public voices fellow of The OpEdProject.

In a recent study, 71 percent of the government leaders said that using generative artificial intelligence in their operations will result in benefits that outweigh any potential risks. Maybe we should enshrine the use of data in our founding documents.

Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” I think it is now time to append that statement with: “supported by a body of data science tools and technologies.”

Decision-making in industries, including the restaurant business, is increasingly being driven by data. Even some investment funds are now entirely automated from end to end, using data-driven decision-making. But governments are still slow to adopt data-driven methods, even for the most widely impacting policies. In democracies, legislation is still predominantly driven by vote-bank politics and popular or partisan beliefs.


While data science is not yet devoid of biases and other ethical issues that the recent presidential executive order on AI addresses, the science is still mature enough for application in governance – with reasonable checks and balances provided under the U.S. Constitution.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Last year, I submitted a grant proposal to investigate the safety of a legal right turn on red using machine learning. It was denied, even though further analysis will prove the efficacy of using of AI to investigate government programs.

For example, I asked ChatGPT: “Based on the data you have, can you tell if making private elementary school fees tax deductible will help society?” ChatGPT is trained mostly on data in the form of natural language statements available on the Internet and not on specific numbers. Still, it did a useful qualitative analysis of the impact by providing detailed and sensible arguments for and against the concept. Using quantitative data certainly is a tool for providing more specific metrics.

Data may also show how much time, energy, and effort spent in commute may have been saved, and accidents avoided, if the government incentivized employers and schools of a minimum size to run shuttles for commuters. More data can probably also quantify the money saved if the resulting climate disasters could have been avoided. We currently do not have these studies, hence we are having to rely on politics and opinions that aren’t supported by accurate data.

As AI advances, and becomes more commonplace, we need to open our mind to how it might reduce unsubstantiated electoral promises, abuse of public services, and government inefficiencies. Data will certainly help in determining if laws like California’s Proposition 47, which reduced certain low-level drug and property crimes from felonies to misdemeanors, did more bad than good to the community – not people or the popular vote.

As part of my talks at events and the class that I teach on Big Data, I explain how a Massachusetts governor’s own sensitive health information was exposed by a graduate student despite his assurances that the common man’s privacy is protected.

President Biden might have been able to avoid contributing to the rise of inflation if there was an additional check done by data-driven methods. Building prediction models using artificial intelligence based on a number of current and past features of the economy, analysts could have predicted how Biden’s proposals would affect inflation.

People’s opinions may not always be correct, but data analysis can expose latent characteristics of the situation described by the data.

Read More

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 11, 2025 in New York City. Following the worst day for the markets this year, the Dow was down nearly 500 points in morning trading.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

The chaos that gripped Wall Street on March 10, 2025, was no accident.

The plummeting stock market, the sharp decline in Bitcoin, and the spike in volatility all pointed to a single, undeniable factor: President Donald Trump’s economic policies, particularly his tariff-heavy approach, have unnerved investors and accelerated fears of an impending recession.

Keep ReadingShow less
Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

Elon Musk speaks during CPAC-DC at the Gaylord National Resort in Oxon Hill, M.D., on Feb. 20, 2025.

Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

When the computers arrived at City Hall in January of 2002, they were the talk of the town.

Known as “The Bloomberg,” the system of flat-screen terminals used to crunch real-time market data made famous by their namesake mogul Mike Bloomberg, were sent to populate the new mayor of New York City’s wall-less office, known to his staffers as The Bullpen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma
white microscope on top of black table
Photo by Ousa Chea on Unsplash

Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma

As India marches towards its ambitious goal of becoming a “Viksit Bharat” by 2047, as proclaimed by Narendra Modi, a critical challenge threatens this vision: the ongoing exodus of its brightest minds. India aspires to become a global power, but its current development seems to rely more on its population size than on its achievements in science, technology, art, innovation, and the like. This strategic vacuum is particularly glaring in the discussion around the H-1B visa. The Indian government has always attached great importance to the US H-1B visa, regarding it as part of its national interest. However, what is more worth thinking about is: why does India actively support the outflow of outstanding talents from the country?

A report “The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2024” released by the US National Science Foundation shows that in 2021, foreign-born scientists and engineers accounted for about 19% of all science and engineering workers in the United States, and this proportion jumped to about 43% among scientists and engineers with doctoral degrees. Among them, India has become the largest source of foreign-born science and engineering workers, accounting for 29%. “Our dependence on foreign talent, especially our over-reliance on talent from strategic competitors such as India, is like a double-edged sword. It has promoted our scientific and technological progress, but it has also exposed our weaknesses,” in response to this phenomenon, Divyansh Kaushik of the Institute of the Federation of American Scientists, emphasized. Why can’t a country that can cultivate a large number of internationally competitive talents keep them in the country? According to statistics, 75% of H-1B visa holders in the United States are from India, which reflects the structural problems of India’s local job market.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Figurines of manual workers with stacks of coins

Getty Images/Glow Images

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Among the international trade issues making headlines is President Trump’s recent announcement to abandon current U.S. law regarding small, low-value packages containing products purchased by Americans from overseas. The initial Executive Order was paused just days later. But the threat remains, making damaging economic repercussions imminent.

The process for such small-dollar shipments is de minimis entry. The term means “pertaining to tiny or trivial things,” emphasizing why its usage only applies to goods under a lower-priced threshold.

Keep ReadingShow less