Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Where are the private-sector leaders in the battle to save our democracy?

empty suit next to American flag

"As we watch with growing alarm as our democratic norms erode, one notable voice has been largely missing from the conversation: private-sector leadership," writes Radwell.

Sean Gladwell

Radwell is the author of “American Schism” and serves on the Business Council for Business for America.

Due to growing political divides, the United States is at the greatest risk since the Civil War. As a former CEO, I’d like to know why my fellow business leaders aren’t doing more to fix it.

Over the last decade our political debate has collapsed under the weight of toxic hyperpartisanship, and millions of our fellow citizens have lost faith in our established institutions. Both political parties are failing to deliver solutions for working-class citizens or to address the ever-increasing prosperity gap. As a result, Americans increasingly look outside the establishment for answers.

Indeed, our public sector no longer functions productively. A tidal wave of rage and resentment crowds out rational debate and the willingness to listen to other points of view. Empirical data, diverse viewpoints, reason and compromise are all essential to solve public policy problems. Yet these very elements seem completely missing today, and a deep cynicism has taken root across the country.


In my book “American Schism” (2022 International Book Award winner for best general nonfiction), I discuss the paradox of the “frustrated majority,” the 70 percent of Americans who recognize that our political system is broken and we must find a more productive way forward. Why is this a paradox? Because this group often remains silent, believing they are actually in the minority since the voices on the extreme left and right get the most media coverage and are pandered to by political candidates. It’s time for the moderate majority to take the lead.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

As we watch with growing alarm as our democratic norms erode, one notable voice has been largely missing from the conversation: private-sector leadership. These individuals represent the most influential segment of the “frustrated majority” – but are also largely silent.

To be clear, business is heavily involved in government when advancing its own interests; one walk down K Street proves that. But when it comes to defending our fundamental democratic institutions, business leaders are even more likely to keep their heads in the sand due to the risk of political blowback, being canceled or boycotted, or incurring the wrath of activist groups online.

Business for America, a nonpartisan business membership organization, is leading the charge to address this silence. BFA works with companies that want to help boost civic engagement, reduce political polarization and modernize government. In its recent “Business Survey on Political Backlash,” the group confirmed that business leaders from firms both large and small feel that attacks on business are driven by political agendas and not a genuine desire to solve issues (93 percent of those surveyed). Further, over 80 percent of these leaders believe that attacks from political leaders on businesses is at an all-time high. Leaders’ top concerns are finding themselves in a PR crisis, consumer boycotts and retaliatory action from government officials.

So many C-level executives whom I know personally are afraid to speak out lest they attract the rage of some anonymous community, causing irreparable damage to their brand or their bottom line. While many of them remain silent, as the BFA survey indicates, the level of concern is very high. Why are private-sector leaders so reluctant to speak out and defend the open democratic society that has been fundamental to their liberty and success?

The irony of this situation is striking: Business leaders have mastered the practical tools to solve problems, which is precisely what is missing in our public policy sphere. These very leaders hold the key to breaking out of our impasse: in addition to their empirical problem-solving skills, their abilities to forge compromise and drive to consensus are the secret sauce that is missing today. And yet the very leaders who can shift the dynamic in our politics have been cowed into silence.

I propose that we can only move forward if the frustrated majority finds the courage to wrestle back the gavel from the partisan extremes who are running (what feels more and more like) an asylum. The leadership voices within this moderate majority group — especially my fellow business leaders — are the ones we desperately need to hear before time runs out on our democracy.

Read More

Dictionary definition of tariff
Would replacing the income tax with higher tariffs help ‘struggling Americans’?
Devonyu/Getty Images

Could Trump’s tariffs have unintended consequences that hurt America?

The first few weeks of the Trump administration have been head-spinning. President Trump and his team were well-prepared to launch their policy agenda, signing over 50 executive orders, the most in a president's first month in more than 40 years. A major focus has been economic policy, first with immigration raids, which were quickly followed by announcements of tariffs on imports from America’s biggest trade partners.

The tariff announcements have followed a meandering and confusing course. President Trump announced the first tariffs on February 1, but within 24 hours, he suspended the tariffs on Mexico and Canada in favor of “negotiations.” Mexico and Canada agreed to enforce their borders better to stop migrants and fentanyl imports, which the Trump administration called a victory. Despite the triumphalist rhetoric, the enforcement measures were substantially the same as what both countries were already planning to do.

Keep ReadingShow less
From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

The flag of India.

Canva Images

From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

In the intricate landscape of global geopolitics, the ascendancy of Indian Americans stands as a quiet yet transformative force—a phenomenon that demands serious consideration. While traditional paradigms of power focus on military might or economic clout, the strategic leverage wielded by this diaspora is rewriting the rules of global influence. India’s economic trajectory reflects its ambitions on the global stage. Contributing 4% to global GDP today, the nation is poised to become the world’s third $10 trillion economy within two decades. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts India will account for 18% of total global growth by decade’s end, a rise that challenges established economic hierarchies.

Trade data between India and the United States reflects the growing interdependence: In 2020, U.S. imports to India stood at $51.3 billion. This figure grew to $80.1 billion in 2024, alongside a trade deficit swelling from $24.2 billion to $41.5 billion. This trade expansion is mirrored by Indian-American professionals dominating key sectors of the U.S. economy. With a median household income of $119,000, Indian Americans outperform national averages and hold influential roles across corporate and governmental institutions. CEOs of global giants like Microsoft, Google, and Citibank exemplify this trend, along with leadership roles in companies like Apple, Intel, and Dell.

Keep ReadingShow less
Will Trump’s immigration crackdown be good or bad for the economy?

Roofers on an 8-12 pitch roof laying under-layment before installing roof tile. Roofer is throwing safety line out of the way.

Getty Images//TerryJ

Will Trump’s immigration crackdown be good or bad for the economy?

In his first days in office, President Donald Trump wasted no time showing he means business, announcing a crackdown on immigration. He declared a national emergency, signed a raft of executive orders, sent 1,500 active duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, and his Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) has initiated raids on thousands of migrants across the nation.

The issue of immigration has always been multifaceted, impacting both the economy and human rights, not to mention the expensive logistical operation necessary to deport millions of people. But my discussion below is focused specifically on this question: what will happen to the economy if many of the immigrant workers (who are also consumers and taxpayers) who fill many jobs in the construction, restaurant, health care, agriculture, and elder care industries, suddenly are whisked away?

Keep ReadingShow less
Tariffs: Not a tax, and not free money

United States trade cargo container hanging against clouds background

Getty Images//Iskandar Zulkarnean

Tariffs: Not a tax, and not free money

During the recent election season, there was much talk of Trump’s plan to lay tariffs on the importation of foreign goods. Pundits, politicians, and journalists to the left of center consistently referred to them as a tax on the American people. Many of those to the right of center, especially those of the MAGA contingent, seemed to imply they are a pain-free way for the federal government to raise money.

Some correctly said that the country essentially ran on tariffs in its early history. Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary and arguably the godfather of our initial financial system, successfully proposed and implemented a tariff system with two goals in mind. Fund the young American government and protect young American businesses against competition from established foreign companies. The second bill signed by President George Washington was a broad tariff bill.

Keep ReadingShow less