Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Will Trump and Musk ultimately clash?

Will Trump and Musk ultimately clash?

President-elect Donald Trump and Elon Musk talk ring side during the UFC 309 event at Madison Square Garden on November 16, 2024.

Getty Images / Chris Unger

In June of 2017, Elon Musk, the Chief Executive Officer of Tesla, abruptly left the White House advisory council on manufacturing after U.S. President Donald Trump said he would withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord.

Despite the pleas from many U.S. allies and corporate leaders, Trump went ahead and withdrew at the start of his first term as President.


President Biden wasted no time rejoining the Paris Agreement on his very first day in office, January 20, 2021, and officially became a party to the agreement one month later.

And now four years later, once again Trump has decided to withdraw the U.S. from the climate treaty as he signed a withdrawal from the Paris climate treaty on his first day in office, including a letter to the United Nations explaining the reasons for the withdrawal.

It is interesting to note that there are no public comments from one of his strongest allies, Elon Musk, on the withdrawal from the accords.

This is somewhat surprising given that Musk strongly believes in global warming. For many years he has consistently voiced his concerns about climate change and its impact on humanity, and has stated that “climate change is the biggest threat that humanity faces this century, second only to artificial intelligence.” He has also repeatedly emphasized the importance of transitioning to sustainable energy to combat this crisis.

As the leader of Tesla, Musk's long commitment to sustainability is well known given Tesla’s focus on electric vehicles and clean energy, plus his funding initiatives like the XPRIZE Carbon Removal program.

Furthermore, Musk believes that the transition to sustainable energy needs to happen as quickly as possible, emphasizing that the world needs to move away from fossil fuels and transition to renewable energy sources urgently to mitigate the effects of climate change.

In contrast, Donald Trump has made several remarks about global warming referring to climate change as a "hoax" and has questioned the scientific consensus on the issue. On many occasions, Trump has criticized climate policies, emphasizing economic growth and energy independence over concerns of climate change.

This is in stark contrast to Musk, who has also highlighted the economic opportunities that come with transitioning to renewable energy and his belief in prioritizing sustainability. His stance remains clear: addressing climate change is not just an environmental necessity but also an economic opportunity.

Whether their differing viewpoints on climate change will surface into public disagreement remains to be seen. Musk certainly isn’t adverse to expressing his opinion, as he did two days after Trump was inaugurated when he voiced doubts about President Trump’s newly announced infrastructure plan for AI, claiming technology companies behind the effort do not yet have the $500 billion needed to finance the project. On his platform X, he wrote “They don’t actually have the money.”

Will the two ultimately clash?

That remains to be seen, but Trump has a history of turning on former supporters when things don’t go his way, so it will be interesting to see how the power dynamics work out in this relationship.

Both men are extremely calculating, and perhaps their mutual interests and the benefits of working together will overcome their differences on certain key policies. Or perhaps ego, trust, or fear of losing control, or just differences in vision and strategies, will destroy the relationship.

Only time will tell.

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Ending taxes on home sales would benefit the wealthiest households most – part of a larger pattern in Trump tax plans

File:Homes-for-sale-Burrus-02.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Ending taxes on home sales would benefit the wealthiest households most – part of a larger pattern in Trump tax plans

Not long after U.S. housing prices reached a record high this summer – the median existing home went for US$435,000 in June – President Donald Trump said that he was considering a plan to make home sales tax-free.

Supporters of the idea, introduced by U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as the No Tax on Home Sales Act in July, say it would benefit working families by eliminating all taxes on the sales of family homes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

"Just the Facts" on the new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, its impact on tech firms, startups, and healthcare, plus legal challenges and alternatives for skilled workers.

Getty Images, Popartic

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What Is the $100,000 Visa Fee?

This is a new one-time $100,000 application fee for employers seeking to sponsor foreign workers under the H-1B visa program. The visa is designed for highly skilled professionals in fields like tech, medicine, and engineering.

Keep ReadingShow less
Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

Dave Anderson shares how the Fed’s rate cuts reveal misconceptions about fiscal vs. monetary policy and government intervention in U.S. free markets.

Getty Images, Royalty-free

Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

The Federal Reserve Board's move on Wednesday, Sept. 17, to lower the federal funds interest rate by one-quarter of a point signals that it is a good time to discuss a major misconception that most voters have about public policy.

It is typically assumed that Democrats stand for government intervention into free markets to counteract the inherent bias towards those who are more economically well off. It is also assumed that Republicans, in contrast, reject the idea of government intervention in free markets because it violates rights to property and the natural order of free markets, which promotes the greatest total welfare.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a nurse's hand resting on the shoulder of an older man who's hand rests on top.

September is World Alzheimer’s Awareness Month. Dr. Dona Kim Murphey explains how systemic failures, Medicare privatization, and racial disparities are deepening the dementia care crisis.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

Profits Over Patients: Re-Examining Systems As Culprit in Dementia Care (or Lack Thereof)

September is World Alzheimer's Awareness Month. Alzheimer's is the most common kind of dementia, a disorder characterized by the progressive loss of brain cells and, in its final stages, complete dependence—the inability to remember, speak, move, or even eat or swallow unassisted. Many end up in nursing homes. Seven million people are impacted by dementia in the United States today, a number that will more than double in the next 25 years.

But awareness is not just about understanding the magnitude of the problem or content expertise on the choices we make as individuals to mitigate the enormous present and future challenges of this disease. It is about a consciousness of the role of systems, namely insurance and government, that are seriously undermining our ability to care.

Keep ReadingShow less