Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Conflict of Interest Complaints Against Musk Grow

Conflict of Interest Complaints Against Musk Grow

U.S. President Donald Trump and White House Senior Advisor, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk deliver remarks next to a Tesla Cyber Truck and a Model S on the South Lawn of the White House on March 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

On Friday, March 14, 2025, The Fulcrum published a news report entitled, “Complaint Filed Against Elon Musk for Potentially Violating Laws to Benefit His Satellite Business,” in which we reported on a complaint filed by the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) with the U.S. Department of Transportation’s acting Inspector General. The complaint asks them to investigate if Elon Musk unlawfully influenced government decision-making and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracts involving his satellite business.

Two days after The Fulcrum report, Evan Feinman—the outgoing director of the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program—publicly criticized the Trump administration for allegedly diverting funds from rural broadband projects to Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet company. This criticism was expressed in an email to colleagues on March 16, 2025. Feinman described the diversion of funds as a betrayal to rural America, emphasizing the importance of providing reliable and affordable internet access to underserved areas.


The BEAD Program is part of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), which operates under the U.S. Department of Commerce.

In a strongly worded email, Feinman expressed concerns that this move would leave rural America with slower and more expensive internet while enriching Musk further. He urged people to advocate against these changes and emphasized the importance of providing high-quality internet access to rural areas.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Feinman, in his email, stated:

"Stranding all or part of rural America with worse internet so that we can make the world’s richest man even richer is yet another in a long line of betrayals by Washington." Feinman also urged, "Reach out to your congressional delegation and reach out to the Trump Administration and tell them to strip out the needless requirements, but not to strip away from states the flexibility to get the best connections for their people."

His concerns centered on his belief that Starlink's technology might deliver slower speeds at higher costs, which he believed would not serve rural America's best interests.

Elon Musk has faced several conflict-of-interest complaints in recent weeks, particularly related to his roles in government and his business ventures. Below are a few examples in addition to the FAA and Starlink conflict complaint described above:

  • DOGE and Federal Agencies: As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk has been accused of targeting federal agencies that were investigating his companies, such as Tesla and SpaceX. This includes firing inspectors general from agencies like the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Labor.
  • CFPB Oversight: Democratic lawmakers have raised concerns about Musk's role in stripping the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) of its power to regulate digital payment platforms. This move could benefit Musk's plans to expand Twitter/X into a financial services platform. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) are calling on the Office of Government Ethics to investigate Musk’s compliance with federal ethics laws, specifically whether he has recused himself from DOGE’s work with the CFPB or been issued ethics waivers. “If Mr. Musk has taken actions in his federal role that will benefit his financial interests without receiving appropriate waivers and approvals, he may have violated the criminal conflict of interest statute,” the letter from Warren and Schiff read.
  • Delaware Legislation: A proposed bill in Delaware, allegedly influenced by Musk, would shield corporate executives from liability and make it harder to hold them accountable for conflicts of interest. Critics argue this could benefit Musk and other powerful executives.

Given the extent of Elon Musk’s role with DOGE and the increased attention on his actions, the likelihood of further scrutiny, allegations, and charges of conflict of interest is considerable, especially given the existing and potentially additional federal contracts for Tesla and SpaceX.


David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 11, 2025 in New York City. Following the worst day for the markets this year, the Dow was down nearly 500 points in morning trading.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

The chaos that gripped Wall Street on March 10, 2025, was no accident.

The plummeting stock market, the sharp decline in Bitcoin, and the spike in volatility all pointed to a single, undeniable factor: President Donald Trump’s economic policies, particularly his tariff-heavy approach, have unnerved investors and accelerated fears of an impending recession.

Keep ReadingShow less
Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

Elon Musk speaks during CPAC-DC at the Gaylord National Resort in Oxon Hill, M.D., on Feb. 20, 2025.

Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

When the computers arrived at City Hall in January of 2002, they were the talk of the town.

Known as “The Bloomberg,” the system of flat-screen terminals used to crunch real-time market data made famous by their namesake mogul Mike Bloomberg, were sent to populate the new mayor of New York City’s wall-less office, known to his staffers as The Bullpen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma
white microscope on top of black table
Photo by Ousa Chea on Unsplash

Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma

As India marches towards its ambitious goal of becoming a “Viksit Bharat” by 2047, as proclaimed by Narendra Modi, a critical challenge threatens this vision: the ongoing exodus of its brightest minds. India aspires to become a global power, but its current development seems to rely more on its population size than on its achievements in science, technology, art, innovation, and the like. This strategic vacuum is particularly glaring in the discussion around the H-1B visa. The Indian government has always attached great importance to the US H-1B visa, regarding it as part of its national interest. However, what is more worth thinking about is: why does India actively support the outflow of outstanding talents from the country?

A report “The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2024” released by the US National Science Foundation shows that in 2021, foreign-born scientists and engineers accounted for about 19% of all science and engineering workers in the United States, and this proportion jumped to about 43% among scientists and engineers with doctoral degrees. Among them, India has become the largest source of foreign-born science and engineering workers, accounting for 29%. “Our dependence on foreign talent, especially our over-reliance on talent from strategic competitors such as India, is like a double-edged sword. It has promoted our scientific and technological progress, but it has also exposed our weaknesses,” in response to this phenomenon, Divyansh Kaushik of the Institute of the Federation of American Scientists, emphasized. Why can’t a country that can cultivate a large number of internationally competitive talents keep them in the country? According to statistics, 75% of H-1B visa holders in the United States are from India, which reflects the structural problems of India’s local job market.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Figurines of manual workers with stacks of coins

Getty Images/Glow Images

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Among the international trade issues making headlines is President Trump’s recent announcement to abandon current U.S. law regarding small, low-value packages containing products purchased by Americans from overseas. The initial Executive Order was paused just days later. But the threat remains, making damaging economic repercussions imminent.

The process for such small-dollar shipments is de minimis entry. The term means “pertaining to tiny or trivial things,” emphasizing why its usage only applies to goods under a lower-priced threshold.

Keep ReadingShow less