Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Project 2025: Elon Musk’s attack on the Department of Labor

Opinion

Project 2025:  Elon Musk’s attack on the Department of Labor

Workers at a Honda Plant in Ohio.

Getty Images, Andy Sacks

Last spring and summer, The Fulcrum published a 30-part series on Project 2025. Now that Donald Trump’s second term The Fulcrum has started Part 2 of the series has commenced.

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) claims to be cutting fraud and waste from government bureaucracy, which is a laudable goal. But upon closer examination, it’s clear that what Musk/DOGE is actually doing is using “fraud and waste” as an excuse to attack government agencies that Musk and the far right don’t like. Their targets reveal the influence of the controversial Project 2025, and so far, there is little evidence that they are saving very much for American taxpayers.


While the DOGE attacks on the Department of Education and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have garnered many headlines, less in the news has been about DOGE’s strikes aimed at the Department of Labor. The DOL, along with its affiliated agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board, is the main federal institution protecting workers’ rights and ensuring a fair playing field between employers and employees. Musk is undermining these agencies on many fronts, including operationally and in their data-collecting and enforcement capabilities.

The thirty-seven-page chapter in Project 2025 on labor contains numerous recommendations to weaken not only the federal labor agencies but also labor unions and their advocacy for workers. And President Donald Trump, through Musk, is implementing a number of these recommendations.

The attack on the Department of Labor has followed the familiar pattern that Trump/Musk have used with other federal agencies. They have placed thousands of DOL employees on leave, crippled operations, removed websites from the internet, and tried to seize highly sensitive data and information systems.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) oversees employee-employer relations and guarantees the right of workers to organize into trade unions. President Trump fired NLRB Chair Gwynne Wilcox and NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo on January 27. The firing of the general counsel was widely expected as part of normal administration turnover, but the removal of a board member, who was meant to serve out a five-year term, is without modern precedent. NLRB members are Senate-approved to fixed terms and can only be removed for “neglect of duty or malfeasance.”

By firing the chair, Trump has essentially shut down the NLRB by leaving the board below the quorum it needs to operate. The board now has just two members, but under federal law, it needs at least three members to act. The fired chair is suing the Trump administration for exceeding its presidential authority and requesting that she be reinstated as an NLRB board member.

Until there is a verdict, the NLRB will be unable to perform its duties of protecting the rights of workers and monitoring union elections. As just one example of the repercussions, Amazon has demanded that the Trump administration overturn a January 27 union election at its subsidiary grocery chain Whole Foods, when the workers voted overwhelmingly to unionize. In a recent filing, Whole Foods argued that “in the absence of a Board quorum,” the NLRB lacks statutory authority to certify the results.

No doubt, other businesses will be looking to take advantage of the chaos at the NLRB. One of them will be Musk’s company SpaceX. Showing Musk’s clear conflicts of interest, SpaceX has been trying to get the federal courts to declare that the very existence of the NLRB is unconstitutional. Now that Trump is effectively in control of the NLRB, it has sent the court a letter indicating that it is below the quorum needed to make decisions and is withdrawing its legal defense of its own constitutionality. This could well result in the end of the NLRB, which was formed in 1935 as part of the New Deal’s labor protections.

More labor agencies undermined

The next labor agency axe to fall was at the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, which requires federal contractors and subcontractors to commit to nondiscrimination toward workers and tracks compliance by these businesses. It has long been on the conservatives’ kill list —and a major priority of Project 2025—since for decades this program has audited the nation’s largest companies, including Amazon, Google, Meta, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing, to ensure fair pay and hiring to workers of all races and genders.

President Trump’s acting Labor Secretary Vincent Micone issued an order to the OFCCP to “immediately cease and desist” enforcing government contractors’ adherence to anti-discrimination laws and affirmative action initiatives and stop ensuring workplaces are free from illegal discrimination. Ninety percent of the OFCCP staff are being terminated. It hardly seems coincidental that Meta, Google, and Amazon, which were scheduled for compliance evaluations, all contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund.

Other rollbacks of labor rules passed under the Biden administration are in the works, including ones targeted by Project 2025. These include decreasing the number of workers eligible for overtime pay, decreasing protections for people working in extreme heat, decreasing protections for teenagers hired to do dangerous jobs, undermining a worker’s right to not be subject to abusive noncompete clauses that lock you in a job, and overturning regulations that would allow more workers to collectively bargain and hold their employers accountable for labor violations. Trump is also moving to end the legal defense of a Biden-era U.S. Department of Labor rule on independent contractor status, which will make it easier to treat workers as contractors instead of regular employees and deny them Social Security, Medicare, unemployment, and other labor protections.

Targeting data analysis capabilities

As it has with other federal agencies, DOGE has taken aggressive moves to target labor-related databases that include crucial private information, including about whistleblowers. Among the targeted agencies are the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Wage and Hour Division, and the Federal Employees Compensation Act Claims Administration, all of which hold sensitive worker information, including about labor law violations. These agencies are key sources of data measuring fundamental gauges of the U.S. economy’s health, which shape how policymakers and businesses view the economy. A coalition of labor unions has filed a lawsuit, seeking to keep Musk and his computer moles out of the Labor Department’s internal systems, but it’s hard to say how the conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court will ultimately rule.

Elon Musk’s anti-labor history

The fact that Elon Musk, the world’s wealthiest individual, would be the main agitator for these labor reversals is clearly a conflict of interest. Musk's companies currently have an estimated $3 billion in contracts with the U.S. government and a long history of anti-labor management practices. The Department of Labor has 17 open investigations into Tesla and SpaceX. Tesla assembly workers have accused the company of overwork, speed-up and injuries, sub-standard industry pay, and anti-union harassment.

OSHA has repeatedly fined Musk’s companies for serious safety violations, including exposing Tesla workers to hazardous chemicals and an incident at SpaceX where a worker fell to his death. A judge’s ruling in September 2019 stated that Tesla illegally and systematically threatened and retaliated against pro-union workers. At the peak of the COVID pandemic, Musk downplayed the pandemic’s danger and flouted public health orders, calling California state safety officials “fascist.” With the rest of California’s businesses only semi-open, Musk fully reopened his Tesla assembly plant and ordered his 10,000 employees back to work, in violation of the law.

The Trump administration, led by Musk and DOGE, is clearly implementing many of the extreme directives of Project 2025. This scorched-earth campaign against the Department of Labor, unions, and the U.S. labor force goes well beyond anything Trump did in his first term. Many labor advocates are worried that Trump and Musk will roll back worker standards and labor enforcement that have taken decades to painstakingly craft.

Samples of Phase 2 articles about Project 2025

Samples of Phase 1 articles about Project 2025

Steven Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

Read More

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

"Just the Facts" on the new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, its impact on tech firms, startups, and healthcare, plus legal challenges and alternatives for skilled workers.

Getty Images, Popartic

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What Is the $100,000 Visa Fee?

This is a new one-time $100,000 application fee for employers seeking to sponsor foreign workers under the H-1B visa program. The visa is designed for highly skilled professionals in fields like tech, medicine, and engineering.

Keep ReadingShow less
Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

Dave Anderson shares how the Fed’s rate cuts reveal misconceptions about fiscal vs. monetary policy and government intervention in U.S. free markets.

Getty Images, Royalty-free

Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

The Federal Reserve Board's move on Wednesday, Sept. 17, to lower the federal funds interest rate by one-quarter of a point signals that it is a good time to discuss a major misconception that most voters have about public policy.

It is typically assumed that Democrats stand for government intervention into free markets to counteract the inherent bias towards those who are more economically well off. It is also assumed that Republicans, in contrast, reject the idea of government intervention in free markets because it violates rights to property and the natural order of free markets, which promotes the greatest total welfare.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a nurse's hand resting on the shoulder of an older man who's hand rests on top.

September is World Alzheimer’s Awareness Month. Dr. Dona Kim Murphey explains how systemic failures, Medicare privatization, and racial disparities are deepening the dementia care crisis.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

Profits Over Patients: Re-Examining Systems As Culprit in Dementia Care (or Lack Thereof)

September is World Alzheimer's Awareness Month. Alzheimer's is the most common kind of dementia, a disorder characterized by the progressive loss of brain cells and, in its final stages, complete dependence—the inability to remember, speak, move, or even eat or swallow unassisted. Many end up in nursing homes. Seven million people are impacted by dementia in the United States today, a number that will more than double in the next 25 years.

But awareness is not just about understanding the magnitude of the problem or content expertise on the choices we make as individuals to mitigate the enormous present and future challenges of this disease. It is about a consciousness of the role of systems, namely insurance and government, that are seriously undermining our ability to care.

Keep ReadingShow less
Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) arrives for a news conference following a House GOP Conference Meeting at the U.S. Capitol on September 16, 2025 in Washington, DC. House Republican leadership faces a long week as they try to rally House Republicans behind a stopgap funding bill to avert a shutdown, while also navigating growing pressure to boost security for lawmakers in the wake of Charlie Kirk's killing.

Getty Images, Kent Nishimura

Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Every autumn brings its rituals: football, spectacular fall colors, and in Washington, the countdown to a government shutdown. Once a rare emergency, these funding standoffs have become as routine as pumpkin‑flavored beverages.

September 30 marks when federal funding will expire, a recurring cliff since the 1970s. Each year it looms larger, shaping the rhythm of Congress’s work. Lawmakers are again scrambling—not to solve problems, but merely to keep the lights on.

Keep ReadingShow less