Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Project 2025: Elon Musk’s attack on the Department of Labor

Project 2025:  Elon Musk’s attack on the Department of Labor

Workers at a Honda Plant in Ohio.

Getty Images, Andy Sacks

Last spring and summer, The Fulcrum published a 30-part series on Project 2025. Now that Donald Trump’s second term The Fulcrum has started Part 2 of the series has commenced.

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency( DOGE) claims to be cutting fraud and waste from government bureaucracy, which is a laudable goal. But upon closer examination, it’s clear that what Musk/DOGE is actually doing is using “fraud and waste” as an excuse to attack government agencies that Musk and the far right don’t like. Their targets reveal the influence of the controversial Project 2025, and so far, there is little evidence that they are saving very much for American taxpayers.


While the DOGE attacks on the Department of Education and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have garnered many headlines, less in the news has been about DOGE’s strikes aimed at the Department of Labor. The DOL, along with its affiliated agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board, is the main federal institution protecting workers’ rights and ensuring a fair playing field between employers and employees. Musk is undermining these agencies on many fronts, including operationally and in their data-collecting and enforcement capabilities.

The thirty-seven-page chapter in Project 2025 on labor contains numerous recommendations to weaken not only the federal labor agencies but also labor unions and their advocacy for workers. And President Donald Trump, through Musk, is implementing a number of these recommendations.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The attack on the Department of Labor has followed the familiar pattern that Trump/Musk have used with other federal agencies. They have placed thousands of DOL employees on leave, crippled operations, removed websites from the internet, and tried to seize highly sensitive data and information systems.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) oversees employee-employer relations and guarantees the right of workers to organize into trade unions. President Trump fired NLRB Chair Gwynne Wilcox and NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo on January 27. The firing of the general counsel was widely expected as part of normal administration turnover, but the removal of a board member, who was meant to serve out a five-year term, is without modern precedent. NLRB members are Senate-approved to fixed terms and can only be removed for “neglect of duty or malfeasance.”

By firing the chair, Trump has essentially shut down the NLRB by leaving the board below the quorum it needs to operate. The board now has just two members, but under federal law, it needs at least three members to act. The fired chair is suing the Trump administration for exceeding its presidential authority and requesting that she be reinstated as an NLRB board member.

Until there is a verdict, the NLRB will be unable to perform its duties of protecting the rights of workers and monitoring union elections. As just one example of the repercussions, Amazon has demanded that the Trump administration overturn a January 27 union election at its subsidiary grocery chain Whole Foods, when the workers voted overwhelmingly to unionize. In a recent filing, Whole Foods argued that “in the absence of a Board quorum,” the NLRB lacks statutory authority to certify the results.

No doubt, other businesses will be looking to take advantage of the chaos at the NLRB. One of them will be Musk’s company SpaceX. Showing Musk’s clear conflicts of interest, SpaceX has been trying to get the federal courts to declare that the very existence of the NLRB is unconstitutional. Now that Trump is effectively in control of the NLRB, it has sent the court a letter indicating that it is below the quorum needed to make decisions and is withdrawing its legal defense of its own constitutionality. This could well result in the end of the NLRB, which was formed in 1935 as part of the New Deal’s labor protections.

More labor agencies undermined

The next labor agency axe to fall was at the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, which requires federal contractors and subcontractors to commit to nondiscrimination toward workers and tracks compliance by these businesses. It has long been on the conservatives’ kill list—and a major priority of Project 2025—since for decades this program has audited the nation’s largest companies, including Amazon, Google, Meta, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing, to ensure fair pay and hiring to workers of all races and genders.

President Trump’s acting Labor Secretary Vincent Micone issued an order to the OFCCP to “immediately cease and desist” enforcing government contractors’ adherence to anti-discrimination laws and affirmative action initiatives and stop ensuring workplaces are free from illegal discrimination. Ninety percent of the OFCCP staff are being terminated. It hardly seems coincidental that Meta, Google, and Amazon, which were scheduled for compliance evaluations, all contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund.

Other rollbacks of labor rules passed under the Biden administration are in the works, including ones targeted by Project 2025. These include decreasing the number of workers eligible for overtime pay, decreasing protections for people working in extreme heat, decreasing protections for teenagers hired to do dangerous jobs, undermining a worker’s right to not be subject to abusive noncompete clauses that lock you in a job, and overturning regulations that would allow more workers to collectively bargain and hold their employers accountable for labor violations. Trump is also moving to end the legal defense of a Biden-era U.S. Department of Labor rule on independent contractor status, which will make it easier to treat workers as contractors instead of regular employees and deny them Social Security, Medicare, unemployment, and other labor protections.

Targeting data analysis capabilities

As it has with other federal agencies, DOGE has taken aggressive moves to target labor-related databases that include crucial private information, including about whistleblowers. Among the targeted agencies are the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Wage and Hour Division, and the Federal Employees Compensation Act Claims Administration, all of which hold sensitive worker information, including about labor law violations. These agencies are key sources of data measuring fundamental gauges of the U.S. economy’s health, which shape how policymakers and businesses view the economy. A coalition of labor unions has filed a lawsuit, seeking to keep Musk and his computer moles out of the Labor Department’s internal systems, but it’s hard to say how the conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court will ultimately rule.

Elon Musk’s anti-labor history

The fact that Elon Musk, the world’s wealthiest individual, would be the main agitator for these labor reversals is clearly a conflict of interest. Musk's companies currently have an estimated $3 billion in contracts with the U.S. government and a long history of anti-labor management practices. The Department of Labor has 17 open investigations into Tesla and SpaceX. Tesla assembly workers have accused the company of overwork, speed-up and injuries, sub-standard industry pay, and anti-union harassment.

OSHA has repeatedly fined Musk’s companies for serious safety violations, including exposing Tesla workers to hazardous chemicals and an incident at SpaceX where a worker fell to his death. A judge’s ruling in September 2019 stated that Tesla illegally and systematically threatened and retaliated against pro-union workers. At the peak of the COVID pandemic, Musk downplayed the pandemic’s danger and flouted public health orders, calling California state safety officials “fascist.” With the rest of California’s businesses only semi-open, Musk fully reopened his Tesla assembly plant and ordered his 10,000 employees back to work, in violation of the law.

The Trump administration, led by Musk and DOGE, is clearly implementing many of the extreme directives of Project 2025. This scorched-earth campaign against the Department of Labor, unions, and the U.S. labor force goes well beyond anything Trump did in his first term. Many labor advocates are worried that Trump and Musk will roll back worker standards and labor enforcement that have taken decades to painstakingly craft.

Samples of Phase 2 articles about Project 2025

Samples of Phase 1 articles about Project 2025

Steven Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

Read More

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 11, 2025 in New York City. Following the worst day for the markets this year, the Dow was down nearly 500 points in morning trading.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

The chaos that gripped Wall Street on March 10, 2025, was no accident.

The plummeting stock market, the sharp decline in Bitcoin, and the spike in volatility all pointed to a single, undeniable factor: President Donald Trump’s economic policies, particularly his tariff-heavy approach, have unnerved investors and accelerated fears of an impending recession.

Keep ReadingShow less
Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

Elon Musk speaks during CPAC-DC at the Gaylord National Resort in Oxon Hill, M.D., on Feb. 20, 2025.

Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

When the computers arrived at City Hall in January of 2002, they were the talk of the town.

Known as “The Bloomberg,” the system of flat-screen terminals used to crunch real-time market data made famous by their namesake mogul Mike Bloomberg, were sent to populate the new mayor of New York City’s wall-less office, known to his staffers as The Bullpen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma
white microscope on top of black table
Photo by Ousa Chea on Unsplash

Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma

As India marches towards its ambitious goal of becoming a “Viksit Bharat” by 2047, as proclaimed by Narendra Modi, a critical challenge threatens this vision: the ongoing exodus of its brightest minds. India aspires to become a global power, but its current development seems to rely more on its population size than on its achievements in science, technology, art, innovation, and the like. This strategic vacuum is particularly glaring in the discussion around the H-1B visa. The Indian government has always attached great importance to the US H-1B visa, regarding it as part of its national interest. However, what is more worth thinking about is: why does India actively support the outflow of outstanding talents from the country?

A report “The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2024” released by the US National Science Foundation shows that in 2021, foreign-born scientists and engineers accounted for about 19% of all science and engineering workers in the United States, and this proportion jumped to about 43% among scientists and engineers with doctoral degrees. Among them, India has become the largest source of foreign-born science and engineering workers, accounting for 29%. “Our dependence on foreign talent, especially our over-reliance on talent from strategic competitors such as India, is like a double-edged sword. It has promoted our scientific and technological progress, but it has also exposed our weaknesses,” in response to this phenomenon, Divyansh Kaushik of the Institute of the Federation of American Scientists, emphasized. Why can’t a country that can cultivate a large number of internationally competitive talents keep them in the country? According to statistics, 75% of H-1B visa holders in the United States are from India, which reflects the structural problems of India’s local job market.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Figurines of manual workers with stacks of coins

Getty Images/Glow Images

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Among the international trade issues making headlines is President Trump’s recent announcement to abandon current U.S. law regarding small, low-value packages containing products purchased by Americans from overseas. The initial Executive Order was paused just days later. But the threat remains, making damaging economic repercussions imminent.

The process for such small-dollar shipments is de minimis entry. The term means “pertaining to tiny or trivial things,” emphasizing why its usage only applies to goods under a lower-priced threshold.

Keep ReadingShow less