Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Project 2025: Voters oppose the far-right playbook

Kenan Thompson

"Saturday Night Live" cast member Kenan Thompson talks about Project 2025 during day three of the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross-partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Of the nearly 200 op-eds I have published since 2013, none received more readership than my June 4 article in The Fulcrum headlined "Project 2025 is a threat to democracy." In fact, that op-ed inspired The Fulcrum's exhaustive analysis of Project 2025.

The series of cross-partisan op-eds, which are void of pre-determined left- or right-wing solutions, explores the nuances and complexities of Project 2025.


If you’re not familiar with Project 2025, it is a playbook specifically created for Donald Trump to use in the first 180 days of his second presidential administration. The far-right Heritage Foundation spent $22 million to create the 887-page policy book; it involved 34 authors, 277 contributors, a 54-member advisory board and a coalition of 110 conservative organizations (including the American Legislative Exchange Council, The Heartland Institute, Liberty University, Middle East Forum, Moms for Liberty, the NRA, Pro-Life America, Tea Party Patriots). Formally called the “Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise,” it is available to read online.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

It’s important to know that Heritage President Kevin Roberts has close affiliations with Trump, vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance and Russian President Vladimir Putin. He referred to Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s Hungarian dictatorship as the model” of conservative politics.

The 30 chapters of Project 2025, described by Politico as an authoritarian Christian nationalist movement with the purposeful intention of moving America from a democracy to an autocracy-fascist-oriented country, are a daunting read.

Trump has tried to distance himself from Project 2025, though at least 140 people who worked in his administration were involved in writing the plan. Vance wrote the foreword to Roberts’ upcoming book, though — interestingly — due to mounting controversy over Project 2025, sales have been delayed until after the Nov. 5 election.

Additionally, 23 videos with 14 hours of content have been prepared to coach future Trump administration appointees on how to implement Project 2025’s plan changing America’s form of government to a dictatorship and undermine the rule of law, separation of powers, civil liberties, and separation of church and state. Twenty-nine of the 36 speakers in training videos have worked for Trump or Vance.

At 9:39 a.m. on July 5, Trump posted on Truth Social: “I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying.”

National columnist Will Bunch responded: “I wish Trump luck in getting a single person, on either side of the political divide, to believe that he knows nothing about Project 2025, yet somehow knows that he disagrees with most of it. Indeed, this is Trump’s 2024 version of the big lie.”

There’s a preponderance of evidence — a standard of proof used in most civil trials — that links Trump and Vance to Project 2025.

A July 8-11 YouGov poll found 59 percent of American adults are aware of Project 2025; including 71 percent of Democrats, 55 percent of Republicans and 50 percent of independents.

Another YouGov survey found 68 percent of the proposed Project 2025 policies are opposed by Americans. Might this suggest about one of every three adults, possibly MAGA Republicans, favor presidential dictatorship, Christian nationalism and the power of white male supremacy?

Project 2025 is an issue every registered voter ought to become very knowledgeable about. If Trump is elected, there is an exceedingly high probability he will act upon the multipronged recommendations contained within the 30 chapters.

This is not an election to sit out. Your vote on Nov. 5 will identify the future of our country for your children, grandchildren and heirs down-the-road.

More articles about Project 2025

    Read More

    Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the Oval Office

    President-elect Donald Trump and President Joe Biden meet in the Oval Office on Nov. 13.

    Jabin Botsford /The Washington Post via Getty Images

    Selfish Biden has given us four years of Trump

    It’s been a rough go of it for those of us still clinging to antiquated notions that with leadership and power should come things like honesty, integrity, morality, and expertise.

    One look at any number of Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks and it’s clear those things no longer matter to a great number of people. (Hell, one look at Trump himself and that’s painfully, comically obvious.)

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Donald Trump
    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    How to approach Donald Trump's second presidency

    The resistance to Donald Trump has failed. He has now shaped American politics for nearly a decade, with four more years — at least — to go. A hard truth his opponents must accept: Trump is the most dominant American politician since Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

    This dominance unsettles and destabilizes American democracy. Trump is a would-be authoritarian with a single overriding impulse — to help himself above all else.

    Yet somehow he keeps winning.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Donald Trump and his family on stage

    President-elect Donald Trump claimed a mandate on Nov. 6.

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    Elections don’t tell leaders what voters want. 2024 was no exception.

    Interpreting the meaning of any election is no easy task. In a democracy, the results never speak for themselves. That is as true of the 2024 presidential election as it has been for any other.

    This year, as is the case every four years, the battle to say what the results mean and what lessons the winning candidate should learn began as soon as the voters were counted. But, alas, elections don’t speak for themselves.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Young people cheering

    Supporters cheer during a campaign event with Vice President Kamala Harris at Temple University in Philadelphia on Aug. 6.

    Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

    The youth have spoken in favor of Harris, but it was close

    For many young voters, the 2024 presidential election was the moment they had been waiting for. Months of protests and demonstrations and two political conventions had all led to this — the opportunity to exercise their democratic rights and have a say in their future.

    While Donald Trump won the election, Kamala Harris won among young voters. But even though 18- to 29-year-olds provided the strongest support for Harris, President Joe Biden did better with that cohort four years ago.

    Keep ReadingShow less