Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: United States Vs. China Tariff War

USA China trade war and American tariffs as opposing cargo freight containers in conflict as an economic and diplomatic dispute over import and exports concept as a 3D illustration.
Are Trump's tariffs good for the economy or will they increase prices?
wildpixel/Getty Images


What tariffs did the United States impose on China on April 2nd?

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a series of tariffs, including a 10% universal tariff on all imports, with additional country-specific rates. For China, an additional 34% tariff was imposed.


These tariffs are in addition to the 10% tariff on China imposed in February 2025, which was raised to 20% in March 2025, bringing the total tariff on Chinese imports to 54%.

The 10% universal tariff will take effect on April 5, 2025, while the higher country-specific rates, including the additional 34% on China, are scheduled to begin on April 9, 2025.

What amount of tariff did China announce on April 4th in response?

In retaliation, China announced a 34% tariff on all U.S. imports, set to go into effect on April 10, 2025.

Have any lawsuits been filed that could stop Trump's April 2nd tariffs?

On April 3, 2025, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), a legal group with conservative backing, filed a lawsuit in federal court in Florida on behalf of Simplified, a Florida-based retailer. The lawsuit contends that the tariffs on Chinese imports are unconstitutional and seeks to block their implementation and enforcement. The plaintiffs argue that the President overstepped his authority by imposing these tariffs without proper congressional approval, asserting that such actions require detailed investigations and findings as stipulated by trade statutes.

Legal experts anticipate that the courts will need to determine whether the President's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the tariffs is lawful. Historically, the IEEPA has been employed for sanctions rather than for imposing tariffs, making this a novel application of the law. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a significant precedent regarding the scope of presidential authority in trade matters.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In 2024, did China impose tariffs on the US, and did the US impose tariffs on China? If so, what products did they apply to?

In 2024, China and the United States had tariffs on each other's goods as part of their ongoing trade tensions.

  • U.S. Tariffs on China: Tariffs included increases on solar wafers and polysilicon (from 25% to 50%), steel and aluminum (25%), electric vehicles (from 27.5% up to 102.5% over three years), and lithium-ion EV batteries and critical minerals (set to reach 25% by 2025).
  • China's Tariffs on the U.S.: China imposed reciprocal tariffs targeting key U.S. exports, particularly agricultural and energy products. These included tariffs ranging from 10% to 15% on U.S. soybeans and sorghum, a 15% tariff on coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG), a 10% tariff on crude oil, and additional tariffs of 10% on U.S. agricultural machinery and automobiles.

What percentage of the total US trade deficit in 2024 was from China?

In 2024, the United States recorded a total goods trade deficit of approximately $1.2 trillion. Of this, the goods trade deficit with China accounted for $295.4 billion. This means that the deficit with China represented approximately 24.6% of that year's total U.S. goods trade deficit.

Are there any advantages of the trade deficit for the US?

Yes, despite often being viewed negatively, there are advantages of a trade deficit for the United States:

  1. Access to Diverse and Affordable Goods: A trade deficit allows the U.S. to import a wide variety of goods and services that may not be produced domestically, as well as an influx of cheaper imported goods, enhancing consumer choice and reducing prices, improving living standards.
  2. Foreign Investment: Trade deficits often lead to capital inflows, as foreign countries reinvest the dollars they earn from exports into U.S. assets like stocks, bonds, and real estate. This can strengthen the U.S. economy.
  3. Encouraging Economic Efficiency: Exposure to international competition through trade can drive domestic firms to become more efficient and innovative.
  4. Comparative Advantage: By importing goods that are cheaper or more efficiently produced elsewhere, the U.S. can focus on industries where it has a competitive edge, boosting overall productivity.

What are the disadvantages to the US of the current trade deficit with China?

The substantial trade deficit between the United States and China presents several challenges for the U.S. economy:

    1. Economic Dependence: A significant trade deficit can make the U.S. reliant on Chinese imports, which could pose risks during geopolitical tensions or supply chain disruptions.
    2. Manufacturing Job Losses: Critics argue that the trade deficit contributes to the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs to China, impacting domestic employment in certain industries.
    3. Weakened Domestic Industries: The influx of cheaper Chinese goods can make it challenging for U.S. manufacturers to compete, potentially leading to the decline of some industries.
    4. National Security: U.S. policymakers are increasingly worried about Chinese efforts to spread disinformation and collect sensitive information on Americans.

    The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

    Editor's Note: David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

    Read More

    Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

    With Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) by his side President Donald Trump speaks to the press following a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC.

    Getty Images, Tasos Katopodis

    Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

    Republican U.S. Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri is an unusual combo of right and left politics—kind of like an elephant combined with a donkey combined with a polar bear. And, yet, his views may augur the future of the Republican Party.

    Many people view the Republican and Democratic parties as ideological monoliths, run by hardcore partisans and implacably positioned against each other. But, in fact, both parties have their internal divisions, influenced by various outside organizations. In the GOP, an intra-party battle is brewing between an economic populist wing with its more pro-labor positions and a traditional libertarian wing with its pro-free market stances.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Just the Facts: Trump’s Middle East Trip

    U.S. President Donald J. Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman a signing ceremony at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

    Getty Images, Win McNamee

    Just the Facts: Trump’s Middle East Trip

    The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

    Are pro-Israel supporters of Donald Trump concerned about his recent trip to the Middle East?

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Man looking at stocks on his phone. Stock market.

    As Trump pushes disruption, the markets push back.

    Getty Images, Alistair Berg

    The Markets Strike Back: Why Trump’s Economic Fantasies Keep Crashing into Reality

    Trump may have won the election, but he’s losing the markets. In just 100 days, Wall Street has erased nearly $6 trillion in global equity value, according to Bloomberg data cited in The Guardian. The S&P 500 has logged one of its worst openings to a presidential term since the Nixon years. And fund managers—the real-world referees of economic confidence—are sending a message Congress seems unwilling to deliver: enough.

    While Trump’s second term has been marked by a tsunami of executive orders, tariff threats, and regulatory purges, the financial markets are refusing to play along. From panicked sell-offs to jittery consumer sentiment and retreating business investment, U.S. capital is staging its own quiet rebellion. Consumer confidence has dropped to its lowest level since 2020, with Americans’ outlook on jobs, income, and business conditions sinking to a 13-year low, according to The Conference Board.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Business professional watching stocks go down.
    Getty Images, Bartolome Ozonas

    The White House Is Booming, the Boardroom Is Panicking

    The Confidence Collapse

    Consumer confidence is plummeting—and that was before the latest Wall Street selloffs.

    Keep ReadingShow less