Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Treasury Secretary Bessent Foreshadows Trade Deals With Major Economic Partners

News

Treasury Secretary Bessent Foreshadows Trade Deals With Major Economic Partners

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent talks with Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-NC, after testifying in front of the House Appropriations Committee May 6, 2025.

Athan Yanos/MNS.

WASHINGTON – Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent attempted to reassure Americans about the state of the U.S. economy, despite President Donald Trump’s major economic changes and the instability they have brought to the stock market.

“In the first 100 days of the new administration, we have set the table for a robust economy that allows Main Street to grow with Congress and the White House working hand in hand. We expect to see even more positive results over the next few months,” Bessent told the House Appropriations Committee last week.


However, in Trump’s first 100 days, the stock market dropped more than it did during the first 100 days of any former U.S. president since President Richard Nixon's second term in 1973. Additionally, U.S. Consumer Confidence, which measures U.S. optimism about the economy, dropped to the lowest it had been since the beginning of COVID in 2020.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-MD, blamed the president’s policies, particularly his reciprocal tariffs, for the economic troubles. Trump put the tariffs in place on April 2, and then, a week later, paused the tariffs for 90 days for all countries.

“Small business owners and farmers risk going under as they struggle to navigate ever-changing tariffs. Our economy is in chaos, and so I think, is our government,” said Hoyer.

However, Bessent emphasized that the purpose of the tariffs was to reduce trade deficits with 18 major trading partners. Bessent stated that the tariffs will help force these partners to sign better trade deals with the U.S. and that negotiations with all these countries, excluding China, are already underway.

“We are currently negotiating with 17 of those trading partners, so I expect that we can see a substantial reduction in the tariffs that we are being charged, “ said Bessent, prior to the announcement of a U.S.-U.K. deal.

Two days after the hearing on Thursday, the White House announced a new trade deal with the U.K. to give Americans billions of dollars of increased market access to U.K. markets for products like ethanol, beef, and other agricultural products.

Additionally, with Congress expected to vote on a bill that would make Trump’s 2025 tax cuts permanent, representatives on both sides of the aisle emphasized the need to reduce the national debt.

“We need to change course and get us out of the $36 trillion debt pathway,” said Rep. Michael Cloud, R-TX. “The American people have watched this all play out, realizing that their nation has been in decline.”

Secretary Bessent also warned that, without major changes, the U.S. debt could soon grow so large that it would no longer be sustainable.

“It would look like a sudden stop in the economy as the credit would disappear, as markets would lose confidence, and I’m committed to that not happening,” said Bessent.

However, the Center for American Progress, an independent policy institute, estimated that Trump's tax cuts would significantly raise the U.S. debt by reducing government-generated revenue.

Secretary Bessent said that even with the government-generated revenue being cut, the larger problem in reducing the national debt would be to control government spending. He credited DOGE and other Trump initiatives for playing a vital role in helping reduce government spending.

After the hearing, Rep. Hoyer sowed doubt on Congress's ability to reduce debt levels.

“It takes two parties [to reduce the national debt], and to date, the administration has not been willing to work with the other party,” said Hoyer.


Athan Yanos is a graduate student at Northwestern Medill in the Politics, Policy and Foreign Affairs specialization. He is a New York native. Prior to Medill, he graduated with an M.A. in Philosophy and Politics from the University of Edinburgh. He also hosts his own podcast dedicated to philosophy and international politics.


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Republicans aren’t willing to call the war in Iran what it is

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (left) and Admiral Charles Bradford "Brad" Cooper II, Commander of US Central Command, speak during a press conference at US Central Command (CENTCOM) headquarters at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida, on March 5, 2026.

(Octavio Jones/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)

Republicans aren’t willing to call the war in Iran what it is

Let's state the obvious: We’re at war with Iran.

My evidence? Turn on your TV. U.S. forces, working with Israel, killed the supreme leader of Iran and many of his top aides. We sunk Iran’s navy and destroyed most of their air force. We bombed thousands of military sites across the region. President Trump, the commander in chief, has demanded “unconditional surrender” from Iran. He routinely refers to this as a “war.” Pete Hegseth, who calls himself the secretary of war, also describes this as a war daily, such as last week when he said, “We set the terms of this war.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Selling War Like a Brand Is Disrespectful to Those Truly in Harm’s Way

A memorial in Tyrone honors residents who served in World War I.

Photo by Jay Paterno.

Selling War Like a Brand Is Disrespectful to Those Truly in Harm’s Way

Each day in America as late morning approaches, families of service members stationed in the Middle East probably grow nervous as nightfall nears seven time zones away. On military bases or aircraft carriers, pilots are fueling up and taking off for missions over Iran. In countries across both sides of the Persian Gulf, civilians await the terror of missiles and bombs whistling through the darkness.

Back home, a mother worries about her son in his plane. A spouse, with a young child, worries about their service member while balancing the everyday stresses of holding a family together. At night, the seriousness of war emerges, and the distant drumbeats pound amid the silence.

Keep ReadingShow less
A child holding a basket full of colorfully painted eggs.

A proposed bill in Congress could make Easter Monday a U.S. federal holiday. Here’s what the Easter Monday Act would do, why supporters back it, and critics’ concerns.

Getty Images, Evgeniia Siiankovskaia

Congress Bill Spotlight: Easter Monday Act, Federal Holiday

Easter traditions: chocolate bunnies, egg rolling contests out on the lawn… and the day off?

What the legislation does

Keep ReadingShow less