Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Treasury Secretary Bessent Foreshadows Trade Deals With Major Economic Partners

News

Treasury Secretary Bessent Foreshadows Trade Deals With Major Economic Partners

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent talks with Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-NC, after testifying in front of the House Appropriations Committee May 6, 2025.

Athan Yanos/MNS.

WASHINGTON – Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent attempted to reassure Americans about the state of the U.S. economy, despite President Donald Trump’s major economic changes and the instability they have brought to the stock market.

“In the first 100 days of the new administration, we have set the table for a robust economy that allows Main Street to grow with Congress and the White House working hand in hand. We expect to see even more positive results over the next few months,” Bessent told the House Appropriations Committee last week.


However, in Trump’s first 100 days, the stock market dropped more than it did during the first 100 days of any former U.S. president since President Richard Nixon's second term in 1973. Additionally, U.S. Consumer Confidence, which measures U.S. optimism about the economy, dropped to the lowest it had been since the beginning of COVID in 2020.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-MD, blamed the president’s policies, particularly his reciprocal tariffs, for the economic troubles. Trump put the tariffs in place on April 2, and then, a week later, paused the tariffs for 90 days for all countries.

“Small business owners and farmers risk going under as they struggle to navigate ever-changing tariffs. Our economy is in chaos, and so I think, is our government,” said Hoyer.

However, Bessent emphasized that the purpose of the tariffs was to reduce trade deficits with 18 major trading partners. Bessent stated that the tariffs will help force these partners to sign better trade deals with the U.S. and that negotiations with all these countries, excluding China, are already underway.

“We are currently negotiating with 17 of those trading partners, so I expect that we can see a substantial reduction in the tariffs that we are being charged, “ said Bessent, prior to the announcement of a U.S.-U.K. deal.

Two days after the hearing on Thursday, the White House announced a new trade deal with the U.K. to give Americans billions of dollars of increased market access to U.K. markets for products like ethanol, beef, and other agricultural products.

Additionally, with Congress expected to vote on a bill that would make Trump’s 2025 tax cuts permanent, representatives on both sides of the aisle emphasized the need to reduce the national debt.

“We need to change course and get us out of the $36 trillion debt pathway,” said Rep. Michael Cloud, R-TX. “The American people have watched this all play out, realizing that their nation has been in decline.”

Secretary Bessent also warned that, without major changes, the U.S. debt could soon grow so large that it would no longer be sustainable.

“It would look like a sudden stop in the economy as the credit would disappear, as markets would lose confidence, and I’m committed to that not happening,” said Bessent.

However, the Center for American Progress, an independent policy institute, estimated that Trump's tax cuts would significantly raise the U.S. debt by reducing government-generated revenue.

Secretary Bessent said that even with the government-generated revenue being cut, the larger problem in reducing the national debt would be to control government spending. He credited DOGE and other Trump initiatives for playing a vital role in helping reduce government spending.

After the hearing, Rep. Hoyer sowed doubt on Congress's ability to reduce debt levels.

“It takes two parties [to reduce the national debt], and to date, the administration has not been willing to work with the other party,” said Hoyer.


Athan Yanos is a graduate student at Northwestern Medill in the Politics, Policy and Foreign Affairs specialization. He is a New York native. Prior to Medill, he graduated with an M.A. in Philosophy and Politics from the University of Edinburgh. He also hosts his own podcast dedicated to philosophy and international politics.


Read More

US Capitol building
The United States Capitol building with its white dome against a blue sky

Would Congressional Term Limits Make Congress Better—or Worse?

Starting in the 1990’s, the idea of putting term limits on members of Congress became a recurring idea to reform the institution and improve democracy. The idea was born out of the theory that replacing the current crop of legislators with a new batch would produce a better Congress. More than 30 years later we now have quantitative and qualitative data showing the impact of term limits.

Twenty-one state legislatures have enacted some kind of term limit on legislators since 1990. Since then, dozens of academic studies have examined the impact on such factors as: complexity of legislation, influence of lobbyists and staff on legislative outcomes, and interactions with constituent. Here are some key findings.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand points to the word tax on a screen

Data calculations

Getty Images

Inconvenient Numbers Are a Sign the System Works

Earlier in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that consumer prices rose 3.7 percent over the past year, a little higher than the month before, with gasoline accounting for more than half of September's increase. Rising prices are the kind of news no incumbent politician wants weeks before an election. The report was published anyway, on schedule. That is the quiet discipline of a trustworthy statistical system. It tells us what is true even when the number is unwelcome to whoever holds power.

So, do Americans trust government data? We do. But that trust is incomplete, and it has room to grow.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less