Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

News

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 11, 2025 in New York City. Following the worst day for the markets this year, the Dow was down nearly 500 points in morning trading.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

The chaos that gripped Wall Street on March 10, 2025, was no accident.

The plummeting stock market, the sharp decline in Bitcoin, and the spike in volatility all pointed to a single, undeniable factor: President Donald Trump’s economic policies, particularly his tariff-heavy approach, have unnerved investors and accelerated fears of an impending recession.


Markets opened in deep red, reflecting the uncertainty and apprehension that have become hallmarks of Trump’s second term. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed 890 points lower, a 2.08% drop, after initially falling by more than 1,100 points. The broader S&P 500 sank 2.7%, while the Nasdaq Composite tumbled 4%, marking its worst single-day performance since 2022. By the end of the day, it was clear: investor confidence had been shattered, and much of the progress in the stock market since the November presidential election had been wiped out.

The stock market’s downward spiral also showed no signs of stopping for the rest of the week. Over the next three days, the sell-off continued, with the Dow shedding another 600 points, the S&P 500 losing nearly 100 points, and the Nasdaq falling by 280 points.

The primary catalyst? Trump’s erratic and aggressive tariff policies.

Over the weekend, the president refused to rule out a recession, saying in a Fox News interview that the economy was going through “a period of transition.” The uncertainty surrounding these remarks compounded fears that his trade war with major economic partners was spiraling out of control.

In a classic display of unpredictability, Trump has vacillated between imposing and rescinding tariffs at a moment’s notice, creating an environment of profound instability.

Over the past few weeks, he has doubled tariffs on all Chinese imports to 20%, slapped a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, and threatened an astronomical 250% tariff on Canadian dairy. The result? Already grappling with inflation and higher borrowing costs, businesses are now facing a chaotic trade landscape where supply chains are disrupted, costs are rising, and corporate strategy has been thrown into disarray.

“The stock market is losing its confidence in the Trump 2.0 policies,” Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, noted as markets continued their downward spiral. The tech sector bore the brunt of the selloff. The revered “Magnificent Seven” - Nvidia, Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Tesla - registered heavy erosion.

The electric car giant has been hit especially hard, facing declining sales in Europe and mounting protests over CEO Elon Musk’s deepening ties with the Trump administration. Other major players in the AI and semiconductor industries suffered as well. Nvidia saw a 5% drop, while Palantir slid 10%. These companies have benefited from the AI boom, but Trump’s escalating trade wars have rattled investors who fear supply chain disruptions and increased manufacturing costs.

Despite the White House’s attempts to paint a rosy picture, arguing that Trump’s America First policies would usher in “historic growth,” the reality on Wall Street tells a different story.

The yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds fell to 4.225%, signaling investors fleeing to safer assets amid mounting uncertainty. The so-called “Trump Tariff Effect” has already led to layoffs and hiring freezes across multiple industries. Delta Airlines slashed its first-quarter profit estimate by half, citing economic uncertainty as a major factor. “The amount of uncertainty created by these tariff wars is causing businesses to reconsider their path forward,” Peter Orszag, CEO of Lazard, warned at the CERAWeek conference in Houston.

The market’s so-called “fear gauge,” the VIX, spiked to its highest level this year, a clear signal of the mounting anxiety gripping investors amid growing economic uncertainty. “Extreme fear” has become the defining sentiment, according to CNN’s Fear and Greed Index, and the White House’s assurances have done little to calm nerves. When pressed on the possibility of a recession, Trump danced around the question, stating vaguely that “what we’re doing is very big.” However, for economists and market analysts, the signs of a downturn are already apparent. Consumer confidence is eroding, inflation remains stubbornly high, and business investment is drying up amid trade-related uncertainties.

By traditional definitions, a recession is marked by two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. The National Bureau of Economic Research - the official arbiter of recessions - defines one as a “significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and lasts more than a few months.” In other words, if it looks like a recession and feels like a recession, it probably is one. If market trends continue in this direction, a recession may be all but inevitable.

The bigger question is: how long will this economic turmoil last? Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research, suggests that investor caution will persist until global trade tensions subside. But with Trump doubling down on protectionism, there is little hope that these tensions will ease anytime soon.

Trump’s tariffs were billed as a grand strategy to revive American industry and reclaim lost manufacturing jobs. Instead, they have fueled uncertainty in global markets, squeezed American exporters, and unsettled investor confidence. While the president and his advisers celebrate “historic growth,” the economic indicators paint a more sobering picture—one of volatility, anxiety, and the looming specter of a slowdown.

With each erratic trade move, Trump is not just disrupting markets but playing a dangerous game with the global economy. As the March 10 market collapse demonstrates, investors have grown weary of the unpredictability, and if Trump continues on this path, the much-dreaded recession may arrive sooner rather than later. Ultimately, the stock market’s message is clear: protectionism comes at a price, and the American economy is now paying it.

Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.

Read More

Ending taxes on home sales would benefit the wealthiest households most – part of a larger pattern in Trump tax plans

File:Homes-for-sale-Burrus-02.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Ending taxes on home sales would benefit the wealthiest households most – part of a larger pattern in Trump tax plans

Not long after U.S. housing prices reached a record high this summer – the median existing home went for US$435,000 in June – President Donald Trump said that he was considering a plan to make home sales tax-free.

Supporters of the idea, introduced by U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as the No Tax on Home Sales Act in July, say it would benefit working families by eliminating all taxes on the sales of family homes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

"Just the Facts" on the new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, its impact on tech firms, startups, and healthcare, plus legal challenges and alternatives for skilled workers.

Getty Images, Popartic

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What Is the $100,000 Visa Fee?

This is a new one-time $100,000 application fee for employers seeking to sponsor foreign workers under the H-1B visa program. The visa is designed for highly skilled professionals in fields like tech, medicine, and engineering.

Keep ReadingShow less
Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

Dave Anderson shares how the Fed’s rate cuts reveal misconceptions about fiscal vs. monetary policy and government intervention in U.S. free markets.

Getty Images, Royalty-free

Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

The Federal Reserve Board's move on Wednesday, Sept. 17, to lower the federal funds interest rate by one-quarter of a point signals that it is a good time to discuss a major misconception that most voters have about public policy.

It is typically assumed that Democrats stand for government intervention into free markets to counteract the inherent bias towards those who are more economically well off. It is also assumed that Republicans, in contrast, reject the idea of government intervention in free markets because it violates rights to property and the natural order of free markets, which promotes the greatest total welfare.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a nurse's hand resting on the shoulder of an older man who's hand rests on top.

September is World Alzheimer’s Awareness Month. Dr. Dona Kim Murphey explains how systemic failures, Medicare privatization, and racial disparities are deepening the dementia care crisis.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

Profits Over Patients: Re-Examining Systems As Culprit in Dementia Care (or Lack Thereof)

September is World Alzheimer's Awareness Month. Alzheimer's is the most common kind of dementia, a disorder characterized by the progressive loss of brain cells and, in its final stages, complete dependence—the inability to remember, speak, move, or even eat or swallow unassisted. Many end up in nursing homes. Seven million people are impacted by dementia in the United States today, a number that will more than double in the next 25 years.

But awareness is not just about understanding the magnitude of the problem or content expertise on the choices we make as individuals to mitigate the enormous present and future challenges of this disease. It is about a consciousness of the role of systems, namely insurance and government, that are seriously undermining our ability to care.

Keep ReadingShow less