Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.
The vote has always been a sacred act. Yet, as we have witnessed in the recent Michigan presidential primary and other national elections, an intriguing pattern has emerged that speaks volumes about the current state of political engagement. Many voters are choosing to cast their ballots for "uncommitted" or are crossing party lines not necessarily to support a candidate but to express dissent or dissatisfaction, or to influence the opposing party's outcome strategically.
This phenomenon beckons us to reflect on the vote as a mechanism of choice, an inalienable right to protest and an expressive form of resistance within the democratic framework.
Selecting "uncommitted" on a ballot is, in and of itself, a powerful statement. Voting in this manner represents a refusal by voters to be pigeonholed into a decision that does not align with the voter's convictions. By choosing not to choose, these voters signal that their options are inadequate and their expectations for leadership and representation still need to be met. This practice is not a sign of apathy but rather an active engagement in the political process – a civil protest that is entirely within their rights as Americans.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Furthermore, while controversial, the practice of cross-party voting in primaries underscores the tactical use of one's vote as a form of protest. It is a reminder that the electoral system is not a static entity but a living, breathing organism sometimes influenced unexpectedly. Voters who engage in this practice are not undermining democracy; they are participating in it fully, utilizing their vote to send a message about the direction in which they wish to see their party or the political landscape move. While there are many potential instances of strategic cross-party voting, here are two recent examples from U.S. elections:
- Michigan Republican primary (2000): Democrats and independents were encouraged to vote for John McCain over George W. Bush in the Republican primary. It was a strategic move to support a candidate perceived as more moderate and potentially more vulnerable to the Democratic nominee in the general election.
- Texas two-step (2008): During the hotly contested Democratic primaries between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, there were reports that some Republicans in Texas participated in the Democratic primary as part of the "Texas two-step," aiming to vote for the candidate they perceived as easier to beat in the general election.
From the Boston Tea Party to the civil rights movement, civic protest has been an engine for change and a manifestation of the democratic spirit that defines the nation. The right to protest is ingrained in the First Amendment, and voting – an extension of free speech and assembly – is intrinsically linked to this foundational right. When voters choose "uncommitted" or vote across party lines, they engage in a form of protest that is as American as the Constitution. Whether it is disillusionment with the political establishment, a desire for systemic change, or a strategic ploy to affect the political process, the vote is a tool for expression. It is a means through which individuals can assert their agency and challenge the status quo.
Critics may argue that such voting practices dilute the primary purpose of elections: to select candidates for public office. However, this perspective overlooks the multifaceted nature of democracy and the complex motivations that guide voter behavior. Elections are not simply about winning and losing; they are about dialogue, debate, and the collective shaping of the nation's future. When voters exercise their rights in unconventional ways, they contribute to this ongoing conversation and assert their place within it.
The recent Michigan presidential primary and similar instances are a testament to the enduring power of the vote as a form of civil protest. They serve as a reminder that in a democracy, every ballot cast – whether for a candidate, to support "uncommitted" or across party lines – is an expression of will, a call for attention, and a gesture of resistance that must be acknowledged and understood.
As citizens exercise this right with increasing creativity and conviction, it becomes clear that the vote is not just a means of selecting leaders but also an expressive tool for advocating change, voicing dissent and shaping the political landscape. It embodies democratic resistance, a sacred act that must be upheld and cherished.
