Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Stop the War Declared on U.S. Informal Workers

Opinion

Protestors holding signs at a rally in Chicago against ICE.

Demonstrators protest the agenda of the Trump administration with a march through downtown on September 30, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.

Getty Image, Scott Olson

“Operation Midway Blitz,” the Chicago area efforts by Immigration Control and Enforcement (ICE), intentionally and actively terrorizing Chicagoans, is targeting informal workers, including street vendors and day laborers.

It is a scenario played out across the country, including cities in New York, Oregon, Colorado, Iowa, and Texas.


Recently, ICE used tear gas, shot pepper spray bullets and flash bang grenades, and arrested protestors outside the ICE facility in Broadview, just outside of Chicago. On the second day of protests, my husband and I, who have lived in Chicago for 35 years, joined the protesters who gathered.

Witnessing van after van pulling into the Broadview facility with heavily armed and fully masked ICE workers pulling out of the van, young men, teens, and older adults was frightening.

This action came slightly more than a week after ICE agents in Franklin Park, a Chicago suburb, killed a restaurant worker and father of two, Silverio Villegas-Gonzales, who had no criminal record, after a vehicle stop.

The scale of these attacks risks erasure of a profoundly important cultural presence. Contrary to the promise to rid the country of what President Donald Trump calls the “worst of the worst,” including drug dealers, murderers, and rapists, this is an attack on vulnerable workers who have migrated for work to advance their own and their families’ futures and find themselves in informal work situations.

As a public health professor and community-based participatory researcher, for more than a decade, I have explored community-led solutions to occupational health concerns in Chicago neighborhoods with high proportions of informal workers.

Their work is outside of formal employment structures with standardized pay and worker protections. Informal workers’ work conditions are generally considered precarious as they are exposed to unique physical, social, and environmental hazards. Workers typically engage in informal work because formal work is not often available due to citizenship status, language, ability, or related contextual factors.

People migrate for work as pay allows for basic needs to be met. It is a protected human right to seek safety, refuge, and the opportunity to work.

Informal workers often engage in work outside, in public spaces. They are exposed to unsafe environmental conditions, police and public harassment, and lack standard work conditions, such as access to a bathroom.

Well-recognized in their urban neighborhoods, these workers include street food vendors selling tamales, shaved ice, and nopales, and day laborers who stand in the parking lots of Home Depot or Menards, waiting for a work opportunity.

In order to make a living for themselves and their families (much of their pay is sent to family members in their country of origin), day laborers get into cars or vans, not knowing where they are being taken, what the work will be, if they will get paid, and when they will return.

The work is often extremely precarious and hazardous, and there is a high rate of exploitation in which day laborers engage in work that goes unpaid, knowing they have no recourse.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognize work as a social determinant of health. Work typically impacts health through three pathways: hazardous working conditions (physical, chemical, biologic, and psychosocial), work-stressors, and risks to material deprivation (income, wealth, housing, or neighborhood hardship).

Little is known about the impacts of the work conditions of these informal workers on their health. However, our research found that among a sample of precariously employed workers in a neighborhood, those in the highest precarity category were Latinx and born outside the United States.

The research found that the most employment precarity experienced is significantly associated with self-reported exposure to chemical and biological hazards, physical hazards, and slip, trip, strike, fall, trap, or crush hazards at work.

To be sure, undocumented immigrants face social and economic challenges in the United States. However, undocumented immigrant workers such as street vendors and day laborers play a critical role in the day-to-day lives of neighborhoods.

Street vendors are often up by 3 a.m. and on the street by 4 a.m. to provide breakfast (tamales) for their neighbor workers headed to factory work. They are still on the street when these workers head home for dinner, more than 12 hours later.

They anticipate their customers and have their orders prepared in advance. They are a constant presence in their communities, serving as the neighborhood’s eyes and ears, assuring students get safely to and from school. Their false criminalization and the violent extraction of their lives from the fabric of our communities will have lasting harm.

Undocumented immigrants contribute to the economy as they pay taxes. In Illinois alone, in 2022, undocumented immigrants paid an estimated $1.55 billion in federal, state, and local taxes, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

This past month, many informal workers have been unable to work, given the administration’s attack on immigrants. These workers work hand to mouth. A workday lost impacts the family concretely—a loss of food for family meals, not being able to afford school supplies, and/or a risk of loss of housing.

Research has shown that immigrants, including undocumented immigrants, are less likely than those born in the U.S. to commit violent crime. Waves of higher immigration have not seen increases in crime rates but rather reduced crime rates.

The tragic shooting recently at an ICE facility by a sniper in Dallas, killing two detainees, is being blamed by the administration on “rhetoric” opposing ICE. These acts, plus amped up immigration raids across the country, contribute to heightened fear and uncertainty.

Neighborhoods across the country are under attack. Those who support this vicious assault on communities have been misguided. Immigrants are core to the American story. This is an assault on the fabric of our communities.

Dr. Jeni Hebert-Beirne is a Professor of Community Health Sciences at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) School of Public Health and is Public Voices fellow of The OpEd.

Read More

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

Charles De Ketelaere #17 of Belgium scores his team’s first goal past Unai Simon #23 of Spain during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter Final match between Spain and Belgium at Los Angeles Stadium on July 10, 2026, in Inglewood, California.

(Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

As live sporting events go, nothing comes close to the World Cup. I was in the stands when South Africa, my birth country, hosted the event in 2010 after decades of exclusion from global athletics. In June of this year, I had a full-circle moment when South Africa played in the knockout rounds for the first time, and I stood with my two American sons, arms around them, singing South Africa's anthem — the only national anthem that weaves multiple languages into a single, unifying song. Later in the week, I was in the stands again, cheering Spain's win over Austria, a country to which my only connections are a brief holiday…and the fact that my mother's family fled from there during the Inquisition.

The magic of the World Cup is that everyone in the stands wears the flags and shirts of countries that are “theirs” in some way. For some, it’s where they were born; for others, where they live or where their ancestors hailed from. For some, it is simply a country they have adopted for the afternoon. It is impossible to know how deep a person’s connection runs simply by looking at them. And next to a person waving one team’s colors is a stranger, family member, or close friend supporting the opposing team—or wearing the jersey of a team that isn’t playing that day at all.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose together.

Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose ahead of the dedication ceremony for the opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center, in John Lewis Plaza, on June 18, 2026, in Chicago, Illinois.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais - Pool / Getty Images

America Shouldn't Need a Political Savior to Hold It Together

America is waiting for a political savior, but the problem is structural.

This dynamic was illustrated during two recent broadcast appearances by journalist Katy Tur. Discussing modern secessionist movements on June 15, 2026, Tur found optimism in a poll showing 54 percent of Americans still believe we share core values, and she later expressed hope that future leaders could reunite the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

Keep ReadingShow less