Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Stop the War Declared on U.S. Informal Workers

Opinion

Protestors holding signs at a rally in Chicago against ICE.

Demonstrators protest the agenda of the Trump administration with a march through downtown on September 30, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.

Getty Image, Scott Olson

“Operation Midway Blitz,” the Chicago area efforts by Immigration Control and Enforcement (ICE), intentionally and actively terrorizing Chicagoans, is targeting informal workers, including street vendors and day laborers.

It is a scenario played out across the country, including cities in New York, Oregon, Colorado, Iowa, and Texas.


Recently, ICE used tear gas, shot pepper spray bullets and flash bang grenades, and arrested protestors outside the ICE facility in Broadview, just outside of Chicago. On the second day of protests, my husband and I, who have lived in Chicago for 35 years, joined the protesters who gathered.

Witnessing van after van pulling into the Broadview facility with heavily armed and fully masked ICE workers pulling out of the van, young men, teens, and older adults was frightening.

This action came slightly more than a week after ICE agents in Franklin Park, a Chicago suburb, killed a restaurant worker and father of two, Silverio Villegas-Gonzales, who had no criminal record, after a vehicle stop.

The scale of these attacks risks erasure of a profoundly important cultural presence. Contrary to the promise to rid the country of what President Donald Trump calls the “worst of the worst,” including drug dealers, murderers, and rapists, this is an attack on vulnerable workers who have migrated for work to advance their own and their families’ futures and find themselves in informal work situations.

As a public health professor and community-based participatory researcher, for more than a decade, I have explored community-led solutions to occupational health concerns in Chicago neighborhoods with high proportions of informal workers.

Their work is outside of formal employment structures with standardized pay and worker protections. Informal workers’ work conditions are generally considered precarious as they are exposed to unique physical, social, and environmental hazards. Workers typically engage in informal work because formal work is not often available due to citizenship status, language, ability, or related contextual factors.

People migrate for work as pay allows for basic needs to be met. It is a protected human right to seek safety, refuge, and the opportunity to work.

Informal workers often engage in work outside, in public spaces. They are exposed to unsafe environmental conditions, police and public harassment, and lack standard work conditions, such as access to a bathroom.

Well-recognized in their urban neighborhoods, these workers include street food vendors selling tamales, shaved ice, and nopales, and day laborers who stand in the parking lots of Home Depot or Menards, waiting for a work opportunity.

In order to make a living for themselves and their families (much of their pay is sent to family members in their country of origin), day laborers get into cars or vans, not knowing where they are being taken, what the work will be, if they will get paid, and when they will return.

The work is often extremely precarious and hazardous, and there is a high rate of exploitation in which day laborers engage in work that goes unpaid, knowing they have no recourse.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognize work as a social determinant of health. Work typically impacts health through three pathways: hazardous working conditions (physical, chemical, biologic, and psychosocial), work-stressors, and risks to material deprivation (income, wealth, housing, or neighborhood hardship).

Little is known about the impacts of the work conditions of these informal workers on their health. However, our research found that among a sample of precariously employed workers in a neighborhood, those in the highest precarity category were Latinx and born outside the United States.

The research found that the most employment precarity experienced is significantly associated with self-reported exposure to chemical and biological hazards, physical hazards, and slip, trip, strike, fall, trap, or crush hazards at work.

To be sure, undocumented immigrants face social and economic challenges in the United States. However, undocumented immigrant workers such as street vendors and day laborers play a critical role in the day-to-day lives of neighborhoods.

Street vendors are often up by 3 a.m. and on the street by 4 a.m. to provide breakfast (tamales) for their neighbor workers headed to factory work. They are still on the street when these workers head home for dinner, more than 12 hours later.

They anticipate their customers and have their orders prepared in advance. They are a constant presence in their communities, serving as the neighborhood’s eyes and ears, assuring students get safely to and from school. Their false criminalization and the violent extraction of their lives from the fabric of our communities will have lasting harm.

Undocumented immigrants contribute to the economy as they pay taxes. In Illinois alone, in 2022, undocumented immigrants paid an estimated $1.55 billion in federal, state, and local taxes, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

This past month, many informal workers have been unable to work, given the administration’s attack on immigrants. These workers work hand to mouth. A workday lost impacts the family concretely—a loss of food for family meals, not being able to afford school supplies, and/or a risk of loss of housing.

Research has shown that immigrants, including undocumented immigrants, are less likely than those born in the U.S. to commit violent crime. Waves of higher immigration have not seen increases in crime rates but rather reduced crime rates.

The tragic shooting recently at an ICE facility by a sniper in Dallas, killing two detainees, is being blamed by the administration on “rhetoric” opposing ICE. These acts, plus amped up immigration raids across the country, contribute to heightened fear and uncertainty.

Neighborhoods across the country are under attack. Those who support this vicious assault on communities have been misguided. Immigrants are core to the American story. This is an assault on the fabric of our communities.

Dr. Jeni Hebert-Beirne is a Professor of Community Health Sciences at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) School of Public Health and is Public Voices fellow of The OpEd.

Read More

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

Fight For Today For A Better Tomorrow sign

Canva

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

En español

Operation Midway Blitz outraged much of the Chicagoland community last September when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided neighborhoods, arrested thousands of individuals, and fatally shot Mexican immigrant Silverio Villegas González.

Witnessing these injustices across the country and in Chicago, two local coalitions came together last year to form Allies United, a Chicago-based coalition initially focused on responding to immigration raids, and now prioritizing protecting civil rights and building long-term cross‑community solidarity.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose
white red and blue textile

A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose

As the United States approaches both a consequential election cycle and the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans stand at a crossroads the framers anticipated but hoped we would never reach: a moment when citizens must decide whether to allow the Republic to erode or restore it through vigilance. This is not about left or right. It is about whether we still share a common vision of the country we want to be — and whether we still believe in the same Republic.

The Founders never imagined “the land of the free” as a place dependent on benevolent leaders. They built a system in which the people — not the government — were the safeguards against overreach. James Madison warned that “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” a reminder that freedom depends on restraint, not trust in any single individual. George Washington pledged that the Constitution would remain “the guide which I will never abandon,” signaling that loyalty to the Republic must always outweigh loyalty to any leader. These were not ceremonial lines. They were instructions — a blueprint for preventing institutional strain, polarization, and distrust we see today.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep ReadingShow less