Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Chicago braces for Trump immigration crackdown

Chicago braces for Trump immigration crackdown

Mother and her little son waiting for boarding in the airport.

Getty Images//Keiferpix

Amidst a new wave of immigration reform measures by the Trump administration that is set to put an initial focus on Chicago, nonprofits and community organizations are working to protect and advocate for those with varying levels of immigration status throughout the city.

The Latino Policy Forum is a Chicago-based non-profit organization created in 1988 and dedicated to increasing the quality of life for Latinos in Chicago and throughout Illinois. The organization uses a model called “acuerdo,” which translates to “agreement”. It is based on the idea that community organizations, which are connected to the everyday needs of immigrants, have input when defining the organization’s agenda.


A main priority of the Forum has been promoting integration, which they believe to be woefully absent in recent immigration reform and national policy debates. The Forum promotes integration by pushing for policy changes that increase civic engagement and participation, education, language, socio-economic consideration, social integration, and local municipal support amongst immigrants.

However, this new wave of measures has shifted the focus of the Forum towards a preparation approach since these measures are being implemented on the federal level, and the Forum remains left in the dark as to what to expect in the days, weeks, and months ahead.

José Marco-Paredes is the Vice President of Civic Engagement at the Latino Policy Forum. Marco-Paredes has an extensive background as a political reporter in Spain and says his passion for this work comes from a desire to build bridges between journalists and nonprofits.

Marco-Paredes says the Forum is working to keep its ear on the ground by connecting with community organizations like The Resurrection Project. Right now, one of their main priorities is to inform immigrants on how they can prepare for and respond to ongoing immigration enforcement measures through the Know Your Rights Campaign.

He says the vast majority of their current efforts consist of getting this information to those who are the most difficult to reach and ensuring that the information they receive is accurate and does not sow further fear in the community.

Currently, TikTok and social media sites are filled with waves of information about varying levels of incoming immigration measures and rumors of ongoing raids.

Laura Mendoza is a leading community organizer for The Resurrection Project based in Chicago, Illinois. She is currently working on the ground to promote transparent information regarding the Know Your Rights Campaign to undocumented community members.

“So people, in general, are just scared. They're confused about what they can actually do in situations, and what are the ways to protect themselves and their families,” said Mendoza. “A lot of parents have questions about their kids, you know, and what actions they can take to protect them or to have things in place [that protect them].”

The general feeling of fear and confusion is a significant reason for the Know Your Rights Campaign. Mendoza says the campaign helps to better inform people on how they should interact with law enforcement in certain situations and to know what specific rights one has, regardless of immigration status. On top of this campaign, Laura and those working at The Resurrection Project must answer many questions from concerned community members.

“Like the possibility of you obtaining a guardianship document, you know, assign somebody to be able to take care of your child in the event of you being detained,” is one example Mendoza noted.

Another common topic of conversation is the protection of assets.

“So, what do you do with your house, with your car, with your accounts?” said Mendoza. “You know, we know that immigrants have been in the U.S., have been in Chicago for a really long time, the average is, like, 20 years. I've been in Chicago for 30 years. These are people's lives at stake.”

An important part of Laura’s work with The Resurrection Project is communicating necessary information through the community navigator network.

Laura says those who are primarily doing the work of community navigators consist of women in their 40s who are involved in the schools, churches, and vital institutions within the community. By going door to door and speaking with as many people as possible, she says this is an effective way to get necessary information out through people who can be trusted within the community.

“We train them on, you know, up-to-date news, and they are the ones that are really going out there,” said Mendoza. “They are in the community, they're giving presentations, they're talking to their neighbors about it.”

So far, Laura says there has not been a substantial increase in the amount of detentions that have taken place, but there has been an increase in the amount of attention given to those detentions.

“The administration has said that anyone who is undocumented is in danger, and I definitely think that’s the case… it is difficult to say what the pattern of enforcement will be,” said Mendoza.

Another aspect of the work being conducted by The Resurrection Project is preparing for what happens when detentions begin to increase and how to prepare for those proceedings if they believe some have violated the rights of those detained.

“So if somebody does find themselves in deportation proceedings, we're able to provide them with justice assistance and how to think through and plan,” said Mendoza. “And, you know, sometimes it’s something as simple as they might need a document, and it can be overwhelming to figure out some of these institutions. We would be able to help too. If they want to go public and talk about their case, why they were detained, and why they're fighting to stay, we would be able to help with that.”

In looking towards the future, Marco-Paredes believes there are opportunities to foster productive conversation regarding integration and immigration enforcement measures.

“You were asking if we can work with the new administration,” said Marco-Paredes. “I think that cannot be off the table, right? There has to be an openness to have discussions around what are some of the solutions to the challenges that the country and that the state is facing, and you will not hear us say we're not open to have discussions, but these discussions have to come from an honest approach, and we won't compromise on anything that can go against the community and impoverished folks.”

While the uncertainty of what is to come remains the common thread on the ground in Chicago, people like Laura Mendoza of The Resurrection Project remain hopeful that the Know Your Rights Campaign can prevent the worst by informing people on how to protect themselves best using their Constitutional rights.

“We are part of it… we are part of the solution,” said Mendoza. “We're not just there to be told what the solution is.”

Calvin Krippner is a solutions-based, investigative journalist who studied at the Northwestern Medill School of Journalism. His work brings to light and analyzes solutions to complex issues in various communities, and he extends local analysis to wider societal trends.

Read More

news app
New platforms help overcome biased news reporting
Tero Vesalainen/Getty Images

The Selective Sanctity of Death: When Empathy Depends on Skin Color

Rampant calls to avoid sharing the video of Charlie Kirk’s death have been swift and emphatic across social media. “We need to keep our souls clean,” journalists plead. “Where are social media’s content moderators?” “How did we get so desensitized?” The moral outrage is palpable; the demands for human dignity urgent and clear.

But as a Black woman who has been forced to witness the constant virality of Black death, I must ask: where was this widespread anger for George Floyd? For Philando Castile? For Daunte Wright? For Tyre Nichols?

Keep ReadingShow less
Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less