Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

From Vision to Action: Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship

Principles 4 through 7

From Vision to Action: Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship
assorted notepads

Social entrepreneur John Marks developed a set of eleven working principles that have become his modus operandi and provide the basic framework for his new book, “From Vision to Action: Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship," from which a series of three articles is adapted. While Marks applied these principles in nonprofit work, he says they are also applicable to social enterprisesand to life, in general.

PART TWO

PRINCIPLE #4: KEEP SHOWING UP. It has been said that 80 percent of success in life is showing up. For social entrepreneurs, this means continuing to stay engaged without dabbling or parachuting. Like a child’s toy windup truck that moves forward until it hits an obstacle and then backs off and finds another way forward, social entrepreneurs should be persistent—and adept at finding work-arounds. They must be willing to commit for the long term. I found that this was particularly important when working with Iranians, who tend to view the world in terms of centuries and millennia.


Starting in 1996, Search for Common Ground, the non-governmental organization I founded and led, sponsored a series of highly confidential meetings between prominent, non-official Americans and Iranians. We were still at it 13 years later when we had amassed sufficient contacts and credibility to make a substantial difference in the relationship between the two countries. Notably, shortly after Barack Obama’s inauguration as President, we held unofficial meetings in Europe and New York between former U.S. Secretary of Defense William Perry and Ali Akbar Salehi, then the head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization. Both men had access to top-level officials. We never learned specifically what Salehi reported to Iranian policymakers, but we heard directly from Perry that, as a result of these sessions, he personally told President Obama that nuclear agreements between the two countries were possible. This was apparently a key step in moving the United States toward nuclear talks with Iran.

Even after Search became a multilayered organization with hundreds of employees, I personally stayed engaged in the details of our Iran work. I knew that management experts would advise me, as head of a relatively large organization, to delegate the operation of such a project. Regardless, direct involvement helped me avoid being crushed by administrative demands. I absolutely loved being able to shut my office door; put aside questions of finance and logistics; and game-plan how to improve US-Iran relations. Indeed, I would advise all social entrepreneurs to retain some hands-on functions.

PRINCIPLE #5: ENROLL CREDIBLE SUPPORTERS. Social entrepreneurs, by definition, operate outside the proverbial box. Thus, they are often perceived as fringe players, and they should strive to project credibility. To that end, having prominent backers, while not indispensable, can be helpful. Credibility is best established by consistently delivering high-quality work. However, social entrepreneurs can increase their odds in favor by borrowing credibility from prestigious individuals. At the same time, social entrepreneurs should be cautious about bringing in outsiders who are not aligned with their vision. Particularly perilous are individuals with strong minds and time on their hands. As the head of another nonprofit warned me about prospective board members, “Be sure to stay away from people who don’t have enough to do.”

PRINCIPLE #6: EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED. Social entrepreneurs must be prepared to deal with high levels of uncertainty. If they find it distressing not to know the outcome and cannot deal well with the unexpected, they should probably consider a different career choice.

Social entrepreneurs frequently intervene in complex situations and systems, often encountering unanticipated problems. Even when they do thorough research and ask all the questions they think are relevant, issues are likely to emerge that should have been considered but were not – because they didn’t know that they didn’t know. The only defense is to realize, in the words of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, that there are going to be “unknown unknowns.” Social entrepreneurs need to be agile enough to minimize damage when these inevitable challenges arise.

For instance, just as we at Search and our partners at Children’s Television Network (makers of Sesame Street) were about to start production in Macedonia of a children’s TV series to encourage inter-ethnic cooperation, unanticipated armed violence broke out in neighboring Kosovo. As a result, Macedonian state TV reneged on its agreement to provide us with production facilities and broadcast our series. Obviously, an unforeseen event like the war in Kosovo could have been a disaster for us, but we did not give up. We were sufficiently nimble to build a soundstage in an empty warehouse and to cobble together a network of independent TV stations. Nevertheless, things certainly would have been easier if we had had in place a Plan B. But we didn’t know that we didn’t know.

A picture containing person, outdoor, tree, sport Description automatically generated


(Picture: Macedonian and Albanian boys appear in Search's TV Production)

PRINCIPLE #7: MAKE YESABLE PROPOSITIONS. As Roger Fisher and William Ury wrote in their seminal book, Getting to Yes, it is desirable to make proposals to which others say “yes” and which are both in their interest and that of the other party. The concept of a yesable proposition is so straightforward that many people dismiss it as childish. Nevertheless, when someone—whether a child or an adult—internalizes this idea, the results can be life-changing.

A prime example of how we at Search put yesable propositions into play occurred in the Democratic Republic of the Congo—a country which had become known as the rape capital of the world. Many, if not most, Congolese soldiers acted from the mistaken belief that females were a rightful part of war plunder. Our country director, Lena Slachmuijlder, was able to convince the leadership of the Congolese military to implement a training program to change soldiers' attitudes and behaviors toward abusing women. Our methodology included sensitization training, radio and video programs, participatory theater, and instructional comic books. Whenever possible, we included soldiers’ wives in our trainings. Many wives suffered from both spousal abuse and the stigma of being married to military men, whom the general population often held in low esteem. We ultimately provided training to virtually the entire Congolese army—more than 100,000 soldiers.

When I asked Lena how she was able to get the DRC military to say “yes” to our groundbreaking initiative, she said she took advantage of the fact that outsiders had regularly condemned the Congolese Army due to its predatory behavior. Faced with a steady stream of criticism, the army usually reacted with defensiveness and denial. To her credit, Lena recognized that there were people inside the ranks who wanted things to change, and she made a decision to work with the army—not to accuse it—even if a large number of soldiers were guilty of horrible crimes. As Lena put it, “I didn’t need to denounce the soldiers – nor would it have helped.

A group of people in uniform AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The remaining four principles of social entrepreneurship will be described in the next and final excerpt from the book, “From Vision to Action: Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship.”

In addition to founding and heading Search for Common Ground, John Marks is a NY Times best-selling and award-winning author, who most recently started the Pro Bono Litigation Corps in partnership with Gary DiBianco under the auspices of Lawyers for Good Government.













Part 3

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less