Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Poll: Democrats In Crisis Amid Shifting Voter Sentiment

Poll: Democrats In Crisis Amid Shifting Voter Sentiment

democrat donkey

Getty Images

“Democrats Get Lowest Rating From Voters in 35 Years” — the Wall Street Journal’s recent headline has sent ripples through the political landscape, highlighting a dramatic erosion in public perception of the Democratic Party.

According to the Journal’s poll, 63% of voters now hold an unfavorable view of the party, marking the lowest approval rating since 1990.


The poll paints a stark picture:

  • Only 33% of voters view Democrats favorably, with just 8% expressing a “very favorable” opinion.
  • Democrats are now viewed less favorably than both President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, despite their own poor ratings.
  • Voters increasingly describe the party as “weak,” “out of touch,” and lacking a clear economic message.

Despite widespread voter concerns over Trump’s and GOP’s economic policies—including inflation, tariffs, and foreign policy—a majority still trust Republicans more than Democrats to address these issues in Congress.

Polling shows disapproval of the administration’s inflation management outweighs approval by 11 points. Yet Republicans hold a 10-point advantage over Democrats as the party voters trust most to tackle inflation.

Democratic pollster John Anzalone bluntly stated, “The Democratic brand is so bad that they don’t have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party”.

The WSJ poll follows the sobering poll from Unite the Country, a Democratic super PAC, revealing a deepening crisis of confidence in the Democratic Party among voters — a trend that has intensified since the 2024 election.

According to the poll, conducted between May and June and obtained by The Hill, voters increasingly view the party as “out of touch,” “woke,” and “weak”.

These descriptors reflect a growing disconnect between Democratic messaging and the concerns of key constituencies, including white men, Hispanic men, and working-class voters — all of whom now rate the party below 35% favorability.

The Democratic Party’s losses in the 2024 presidential, House, and Senate races have left it in a state of strategic disarray. Despite efforts to regroup through focus groups, internal polling, and strategy sessions, the Unite the Country survey suggests the party has yet to recover its footing. Enthusiasm among Democratic voters remains low, and donors have reportedly pulled back support due to a perceived lack of vision.

Democratic strategists like Rodell Mollineau, senior adviser to Unite the Country, argue that the party must “meet voters where they are” — prioritizing economic issues like healthcare, education, and housing over ideological battles. The poll also suggests that the party’s emphasis on defending democracy, while resonant internally, may not be enough to win back swing voters.

Steve Schale, CEO of Unite the Country, expressed frustration over missed opportunities to counter the Trump administration’s agenda, including the rollout of the so-called “big, beautiful bill.” He emphasized the need for a “different kind of vision” that speaks to voters’ material concerns.

With the 2026 midterms looming, Democratic leaders face a pivotal moment. Rebuilding trust with voters — especially working-class and minority communities — will be essential. As DNC Chair Ken Martin put it, “When you hit rock bottom, there’s only one direction to go, and that’s up”.

Whether this marks a temporary dip or a long-term shift in the political tide remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the Democratic Party must recalibrate its message, reconnect with its base, and redefine its role in a rapidly evolving electorate.

While The Wall Street Journal’s polling shows Donald Trump’s favorability rating remaining steady early in his second term, other recent surveys indicate significantly lower approval numbers for the president.

The Wall Street Journal surveyed 1,500 registered voters via landline and cellphone from July 16–20. The poll has a margin of error of ±2.5 percentage points.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum, and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

Pharma Industry and Ballard Partners Dominate the Lobbying Space in Second Quarter of 2025
Douglas Rissing/Getty Images

Pharma Industry and Ballard Partners Dominate the Lobbying Space in Second Quarter of 2025

Pharmaceutical and health products companies continued to dominate the lobbying space in the second quarter of 2025, spending $105.4 million to influence public policy. That industry has spent more on lobbying than any other, during every quarter but one, since 2010, according to an OpenSecrets analysis of disclosure reports.

That total was down from the industry’s first-quarter total ($121.4 million) but still 38 percent more than the second biggest spender, the electronics industry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Floods Are Getting Stronger – but so Are the People
traffic light sign underwater
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Floods Are Getting Stronger – but so Are the People

Melissa Otey’s holistic wellness studio, Issa Lifestyle STL, was more than a business: it was a decade-long labor of love and a sanctuary she built for her Florissant community. From yoga, meditation, breathwork, sound and art therapy, and lifestyle coaching, the studio embodied her vision. It even included her own art gallery and a learning space for her children. It was truly everything she had ever hoped to create.

After only being open for four months, though, she had to bear the devastation of her passion being washed away in St. Louis’ historic 2022 floods.

Keep ReadingShow less
"They want us divided sign" that represents partisanship among democrats and republicans.

In recent philosophical and political discourse, the concept of “deep disagreement” has gained traction as a diagnostic for the dysfunction of contemporary public debate.

Getty Images, Jena Ardell

Manufacturing Dissent: How ‘Deep Disagreement’ Serves the Anti-Democratic Elite

In recent philosophical and political discourse, the concept of “deep disagreement” has gained traction as a diagnostic for the dysfunction of contemporary public debate. The premise is simple yet highly seductive: Some disagreements we are told are so fundamental, so rooted in incompatible worldviews or paradigmatically incommensurable epistemologies, that no meaningful argumentation is possible between the disagreeing parties. The implication is stark: Reason and Dialogue cannot bridge the gulf. But this diagnosis, while sounding sobering and serious, is in fact a dangerous illusion. It is an intellectual sleight of hand that masks both the manufactured nature of such disagreements and the vested interests that thrive on perpetuating them.

Indeed, contrary to its glossy surface neutrality, the notion of “deep disagreement” is not merely a philosophical tool but has become a performative trope, perfectly suited for an age of outrage, polarization, and algorithmic amplification. It helps rationalize the breakdown of dialogue, casting it not as a product of bad faith, deliberate miscommunication, or elite manipulation, but as a tragic inevitability of divergent rationalities. In doing so, it gives cover to a much darker political agenda: The delegitimation of democracy itself.

Keep ReadingShow less