Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

New guide for boosting diversity and equity in time for Capitol Hill hiring spree

Katherine Tai

Katherine Tai is slated to be the first congressional aide to move directly to a Cabinet-level post. But she is among the few people of color in senior roles on Capitol Hill.

C-SPAN

One maxim of democracy reformers is that governments will become more productive and confidence-inducing when they start looking more like the communities they represent.

To that end, nine groups with particular interest in Congress have collaborated on a nuts-and-bolts guide for lawmakers to create and sustain more diverse and inclusive teams of aides.

The booklet began circulating this week, an opportune time for altering a congressional workforce that is not keeping pace with American demographic shifts. Sixty freshly elected House members and seven newly minted senators are making their first hires, while dozens of returning lawmakers are confronting staff churn that has accelerated in the past decade — thanks to the high stress but low productivity of Capitol Hill, pays scales not competitive with the private sector, and sometimes racist and misogynistic office cultures.


At a minimum, the corps of 16,000 people who work for the House and Senate leadership, the committees and the rank-and-file membership is disproportionately white — so much so that "the last plantation" long ago became a widespread term of derision for Congress among its employees.

The disparity is across pay grades. Just 11 percent of people in top Senate jobs are non-white, although they make two-fifths of the United States population, according to research by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a think tank focused on improving the lives of Black Americans. And the advocacy group Pay Our Interns estimates that white students get 85 percent of internships in House Republican offices and 62 percent of Democratic offices.

An exception to the view that people of color have a particularly tough time thriving on the Hill appeared Wednesday, however. President-elect Joe Biden signaled he would name Katherine Tai, the Chinese-American chief trade lawyer for the House Ways and Means Committee, as United States trade representative. It would appear to be the first direct promotion ever of a congressional staffer into a Cabinet-level job.

"From entry-level to the most senior positions, a lack of representation means that much is missing from the debates shaping our national policy and priorities," reads the introduction to the guide book by the nine groups, which have named their coalition Representative Democracy. "Decades of studies have repeatedly shown that teams with more diverse experiences, backgrounds and ideas produce better and more innovative products. Democracy itself will be better served when we have the input and influence of more voices to formulate effective and responsive national policy."

And if that high-minded appeal does not resonate with senators and House members, the book offers a more practical rationale for making their office environments more diverse, equitable and inclusive.

"Consider the increased burden high turnover creates for the rest of your staff and the amount of time spent repeating the hiring process," it says, not to mention "the time lost to addressing staff grievances over alleged unequal treatment or denied promotions."

The 36 pages of advice that follow are similarly at once pragmatic and aspirational. Be sincere and intentional about establishing policies to ensure diversity, equity, inclusion and a sense of belonging for all staffers. Define what those terms mean for your office. Be clear about the atmosphere you want to foster during a wide-ranging period for recruiting, then through transparent and standardized personnel policies. Set clear job descriptions, pay scales and expectations for promotion. Assign new hires a senior staffer as mentor.

And finally, there's a pep talk for the bosses — politicians who have in many cases spent way more time fundraising and glad-handing than they allot to fostering a healthy workplace.

"You need to become an ally to your team," the book says, addressing senators and House members, 74 percent of whom will be white next year. "That means working on yourself. It also means doing everything in your power to eliminate structural barriers for your staff. Most importantly, it means you will speak up for them, and you will commit to seeking ways to better understand their experiences."

The authors were Laura Maristany, a senior official at the Democracy Fund, which gives grants to promote a more robust political system, and Maria Robles Meier, a former House and Senate leadership aide and executive director of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.


Read More

President Trump answers questions from reporters.

U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters before boarding Air Force One on August 21, 2026 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Trump’s White House Press Ban Violates 1st Amendment

The principle is simple. Just like politicians are not supposed to pick their voters, government officials don’t get to pick the reporters who cover them.

If they did, the First Amendment would be meaningless. and we would no longer live in anything resembling a constitutional republic. That is why President Trump’s September 18 announcement that he is banning reporters from CNN, MSNow, and Politico from the White House is so dangerous.

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

The CLARITY Act crypto bill failed a procedural vote on Sept. 15, but it could return. Here's what it does, who would regulate crypto, and the Trump angle.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act, which failed in a procedural vote on Sept. 15, and a new venture by the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency company made us think it was time to write about the cryptocurrency legislation. Even though it’s not currently active, the bill could come back.

Keep ReadingShow less
When Money Trumps Life

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly at U.N. Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City.

Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images

When Money Trumps Life

Last week at the United Nations, Donald Trump showed the world just how little he values human life. In a single speech, he rattled off a laundry list of “hoaxes” to write off: climate change, AI, “Russia hoax,” “Ukraine hoax,” and more. Climate change, AI, and modern warfare all pose existential threats to civilization as we know it, and yet our president seems hellbent on gaslighting our fears while accelerating problems that threaten our survival. What would make a person behave in such a self-sabotaging way? Well, perhaps we should, as they say, follow the money.

Earlier this month, the UN warned that Earth is already 1.4°C hotter than before the industrial age and set to blow past the 1.5°C limit in the next few years. The World Health Organization projects that such warming will cause roughly 250,000 additional deaths a year starting in 2030. Any leader who values human life should recognize this as the existential threat it is and change course. Instead, Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the UN's founding climate treaty, and his EPA scrapped the scientific finding underpinning federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, in the first six months since launching his war in Iran, Trump's nine largest oil and gas holdings gained up to $4.4 million.

Keep ReadingShow less
 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Pool/Getty Images

How Presidential Primetime Addresses Shape Public Trust in Democratic Institutions

A question still being studied is the effects on public trust when the head of the Executive casts doubt on the institutions that run elections, enforce laws, and decide legal disputes. The President of the United States is arguably the most powerful man in the world. He is the commander in chief of a nation #1 in nominal gross domestic product as well as #1 in military power, budget, and spending as of 2026. The actions he takes spew ripple effects across the world and follow many generations. A way you can measure the executive's power can also be measured in how much influence his speeches have on the markets, opinions of the masses, news outlets, lawmakers, social media reactions, etc. His framing of an issue can shape the next day’s political conversation.

These conversations become extremely dangerous/consequential when discussing a principle as embedded in our country as Democracy. In his July primetime speech, Trump continued to pedal the claims about election security and argued for stricter voting rules. He continued to portray the country as facing a moment of corruption and uncertainty, followed by presenting himself as the one prepared to restore order. The address continued with repeated claims about his loss in the 2020 election that have not been supported by the evidence compiled over years of investigation by many parties. Professional reviews, audits, and courts have yet to find significant evidence of foul play substantial enough to influence the outcome of that election.

Keep ReadingShow less